DT and trust lists, curious what everyone else thinks on the subject - page 3.

bitmover

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 6089

bitcoindata.science

Quote from: Plaguedeath on November 02, 2024, 08:43:49 AM

Because people are scared including myself even though I've distrusted some users.

Most people will do like this, if they see someone is doing good, they will include them on their list. But, if there's a high ranked user especially campaign manager doing something controversial or they think it's bad for the forum, they will choose to silent instead of distrust them.

Why I mentioned campaign manager? because it might hurt the campaign manager's feeling and cause them to get less chance to be accepted in campaign. You could say you don't care with rust list while accepting campaign participant, but people will still play safe.

If you distrust a campaign manager, why would you join a campaign he manages?

If you distrust him, it is because you think he will scam you or someone else.

Joining a campaign of someone you distrust makes no sense

Plaguedeath

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 663

Quote from: yahoo62278 on November 02, 2024, 08:47:28 AM

If a campaign manager doesn't accept you into a campaign any longer because you distrusted them, they are abusing their power. I would be curious to see if you have evidence of this happening or if this is just a fear you have?

No one know, I'm just sharing my feeling.

I mean, you can imagine if you're want to work under someone company, will you being honest with anything during interview? I doubt that, we were taught to sugarcoat or improvising even lying in order to looks good in front of our employers in order be hired.

Regardless the campaign managers get hurt or not if they got distrusted, I don't know, but as the participants, people will try to looks good in front of the managers.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 4603

Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing

Quote from: Plaguedeath on November 02, 2024, 08:43:49 AM

Because people are scared including myself even though I've distrusted some users.

Most people will do like this, if they see someone is doing good, they will include them on their list. But, if there's a high ranked user especially campaign manager doing something controversial or they think it's bad for the forum, they will choose to silent instead of distrust them.

Why I mentioned campaign manager? because it might hurt the campaign manager's feeling and cause them to get less chance to be accepted in campaign. You could say you don't care with rust list while accepting campaign participant, but people will still play safe.

Distrusting high ranked user when you're still growing is like killing yourself, instead of getting backup from other high ranked user, they might choose to silent too because they're scared.

If a campaign manager doesn't accept you into a campaign any longer because you distrusted them, they are abusing their power. I would be curious to see if you have evidence of this happening or if this is just a fear you have?

Plaguedeath

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 663

Because people are scared including myself even though I've distrusted some users.

Most people will do like this, if they see someone is doing good, they will include them on their list. But, if there's a high ranked user especially campaign manager doing something controversial or they think it's bad for the forum, they will choose to silent instead of distrust them.

Why I mentioned campaign manager? because it might hurt the campaign manager's feeling and cause them to get less chance to be accepted in campaign. You could say you don't care with rust list while accepting campaign participant, but people will still play safe.

Distrusting high ranked user when you're still growing is like killing yourself, instead of getting backup from other high ranked user, they might choose to silent too because they're scared.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 4603

Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing

When I think DT I think users that protect the community from scams/scammers, helps new users, contributes in a positive way to the forum, helps keep the forum clean basically. I know that there are different reasons for people wanting to be on DT. Some just want the prestige, some want to bully others, some want to keep the forum clean, etc.

Trust List are another question spot for me. I know everyone is able to do with their lists what they want and I am not policing that or anything, I just find it curious when I look at someone's trust list and I see they trust a load of people and distrust 0. Seems kind of odd if you ask me, kinda like a person is just trying to get some backscratch action and has no intention or care about the bad side of the forum. They are just looking to boost that trust. Am I wrong? Should a person be on DT if they are clueless because that's kinda what it looks like to me.

I'm not mentioning any names as I would like to see some opinions on the matter. I have more about the trust list but I feel like if I continue with the next part I may single out some people and that's not my intention. LoyceV has a guide for trust system people should read.

Trust guide

LoyceV useful guides

Topic: DT and trust lists, curious what everyone else thinks on the subject - page 3. (Read 785 times)