Pages:
Author

Topic: DT Members joining sig campaigns your share me your though about this. (Read 909 times)

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 336
Ok, I apologize that I "bumped" a dead thread to throw someone a compliment. Why the fuck does it seem that all this site is is a bunch of angry ass wads bitching at each other over insignificant shit they wouldn't have the fucking balls to say to someone's face. When did forums become nothing but a ego stroking circle jerk for low self esteem douches willing to spend their time criticizing complete strangers? When I "bumped" this dead thread did it force you to come online and check it out so that you could be certain you didn't miss out on someone saying something spectacular? Seems like my "bump" of a dead thread gave your lame ass something to do... Who is to say a thread is dead if it is not locked? Fuck... the more I am on this site the more it makes me want to punch myself in the face for being associated with it.

Apology accepted.

I would happily say everything I just said to your face, none of it is even offensive. No clue why you can't handle being told you did something annoying and useless. Kind of like quoting the entire post, instead of what you are responding to, is annoying and useless. I expect an apology for that, too.

By the way, a thread is probably dead if nobody has posted in it in over a week and the only thing you can think to reply is "You're a cool guy".

Continue to wave around your rage-boner and false sense of superiority. You're the one rampaging around, swearing, insulting, acting like a child, or as you put it "ego stroking circle jerk for low self esteem douches". Self-harm isn't encouraged, either, so check your attitude or leave the forum before you do yourself some damage.
full member
Activity: 278
Merit: 100
I had to throw a merit your way and from this post I think you deserve it. I dig that you actually follow what you preach :]

You bumped a dead-thread that hasn't been posted in, in over a week just to say "I like your Chops.", to Vod? Don't get me wrong, Vod is a cool guy, but I'm sure simply Meriting their post would have been sufficient to get your point across. It would seem that posting this and giving the merit, almost takes away from the significance.

Just imagine yourself at their place. Will you risk your higher rank account by participating in multiple campaigns at same time. It takes so much time and effort to reach those high levels that I will never risk it for signature campaigns.

This is not what is being discussed. I don't think anybody even mentioned DT members using multiple accounts for multiple campaigns, and even if they did, again that is not really what the thread is about. You noticed this thread got recently bumped and just couldn't help but post in it without reading the thread, or what?

DT Members should not be restricted because of their prominence, let them operate under the same rules as anybody else, let them experience the freedoms and opportunities we all do while allowing them to do the "job" they've earned through their merits, before merit was an official system around here.

Ok, I apologize that I "bumped" a dead thread to throw someone a compliment. Why the fuck does it seem that all this site is is a bunch of angry ass wads bitching at each other over insignificant shit they wouldn't have the fucking balls to say to someone's face. When did forums become nothing but a ego stroking circle jerk for low self esteem douches willing to spend their time criticizing complete strangers? When I "bumped" this dead thread did it force you to come online and check it out so that you could be certain you didn't miss out on someone saying something spectacular? Seems like my "bump" of a dead thread gave your lame ass something to do... Who is to say a thread is dead if it is not locked? Fuck... the more I am on this site the more it makes me want to punch myself in the face for being associated with it.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
Honestly, they have been are yelling at the top of their lungs that they would ban members who join the forum to be part of signature campaigns while it seems like they are the ones in reality who are spamming the forum with their one liners to make the most of signature campaigns.
They should practice what they preach!
Why would DT members dedicate the time to tag members if they just wanted to minmax signature campaigns?

Oops, gotta hit that 200 character count. A man's got to eat, y'know! /s Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 336
Honestly, they have been are yelling at the top of their lungs that they would ban members who join the forum to be part of signature campaigns while it seems like they are the ones in reality who are spamming the forum with their one liners to make the most of signature campaigns.
They should practice what they preach!

Which DT members post one-liners to abuse, meet payment, or "make the most of signature campaigns"? I'm sure everyone would be happy to rid the community of any DT member that is a low-quality spammer, operating under hypocrisy as you've straw-manned them out to be.

Please, point us in the direction of these people, we want specific names and particular people. Justice will be served, nobody will get away with hypocrisy when judged by the public. However, you cannot just make complaints about the people you'd think it easy to criticize. Normally the one-liners DT members post are either satire, irony, some other form of comedy that they are not being paid for and if they are it is because some information can be concise and helpful at the same time, which many people such as yourself seem to be forgetting.
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
Honestly, they have been are yelling at the top of their lungs that they would ban members who join the forum to be part of signature campaigns while it seems like they are the ones in reality who are spamming the forum with their one liners to make the most of signature campaigns.
They should practice what they preach!
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 336
I had to throw a merit your way and from this post I think you deserve it. I dig that you actually follow what you preach :]

You bumped a dead-thread that hasn't been posted in, in over a week just to say "I like your Chops.", to Vod? Don't get me wrong, Vod is a cool guy, but I'm sure simply Meriting their post would have been sufficient to get your point across. It would seem that posting this and giving the merit, almost takes away from the significance.

Just imagine yourself at their place. Will you risk your higher rank account by participating in multiple campaigns at same time. It takes so much time and effort to reach those high levels that I will never risk it for signature campaigns.

This is not what is being discussed. I don't think anybody even mentioned DT members using multiple accounts for multiple campaigns, and even if they did, again that is not really what the thread is about. You noticed this thread got recently bumped and just couldn't help but post in it without reading the thread, or what?

DT Members should not be restricted because of their prominence, let them operate under the same rules as anybody else, let them experience the freedoms and opportunities we all do while allowing them to do the "job" they've earned through their merits, before merit was an official system around here.
full member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 108
Just imagine yourself at their place. Will you risk your higher rank account by participating in multiple campaigns at same time. It takes so much time and effort to reach those high levels that I will never risk it for signature campaigns.
full member
Activity: 278
Merit: 100
I will never join a signature campaign.

1) They are destroying the forum.  I can't tag shitposters who just want the same thing - wearing a signature.  
2) I've shitposted, if I was aggravated or exhausted (or come home from the bar).  I don't always want to explain myself in length, usually yet again.

I had to throw a merit your way and from this post I think you deserve it. I dig that you actually follow what you preach :]
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
Well the mods must be doing something right. Bitcointalk isn't even on the first page of Google for "shitposting". Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 3060
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Another pathetic conspiracy dreamed up because the truth isn't exciting enough.

OP, you are a fucking troll who will say or do anything to besmirch my reputation in the hopes that I'll stop tagging shitposters like yourself.  I'm not even going to dignify your garbled and irrational attack with any reply, other than to tell you to have fun chasing me around the forum.  Continue the butthurtness if that's what suits you.  You've done exactly zero to help bitcointalk in any way.

Nope I'm not troll I'm just posting what I see  Roll Eyes.

BTW what help did you do on this forum can you name any of those? The way I see you make this forum as your milking cash cow by participatin in sig campaigns and if you really aim to help then take off your sig and show that you're sincere to help the forum. If not then i will just think that tagging those existing accounts is way of eliminating the competitors.


The shitposters that The Pharmacist is tagging would never have a chance in hell of ever getting on a campaign like Chipmixer because their campaign manager actually does their job properly and only accepts quality posters. If all the other crapcoin ICO's and shitmanagers like Sylon did their job people wouldn't have to leave negative feedback because they'd never get on campaigns in the first place. It's because of these campaigns that accept unlimited amounts of shitposters and pay them for any old spam that people feel like they have to take action. Speculating that people are doing this to get rid of competition and free up spaces for themselves is moronic.
member
Activity: 135
Merit: 10
OP, you are a fucking troll who will say or do anything to besmirch my reputation in the hopes that I'll stop tagging shitposters like yourself.  I'm not even going to dignify your garbled and irrational attack with any reply, other than to tell you to have fun chasing me around the forum.  Continue the butthurtness if that's what suits you.  You've done exactly zero to help bitcointalk in any way.

Nope I'm not troll I'm just posting what I see  Roll Eyes.

BTW what help did you do on this forum can you name any of those? The way I see you make this forum as your milking cash cow by participatin in sig campaigns and if you really aim to help then take off your sig and show that you're sincere to help the forum. If not then i will just think that tagging those existing accounts is way of eliminating the competitors.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
OP, you are a fucking troll who will say or do anything to besmirch my reputation in the hopes that I'll stop tagging shitposters like yourself.  I'm not even going to dignify your garbled and irrational attack with any reply, other than to tell you to have fun chasing me around the forum.  Continue the butthurtness if that's what suits you.  You've done exactly zero to help bitcointalk in any way.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
On the other hand what can you say about them joining on sig camp and busting their competitors and gain fame to have slot on every camp they wish to join?
How about the following: I could give him a permanent spot in any of my campaigns. Therefore, he can not be biased as he is never in competition for a spot with anyone? Roll Eyes
Oh right OP, you'd still complain because you're a butthurt idiot.

locations is not accurate and can still be spoofed or faked..
Let me just fake my own timezone by posting during the night time and sleeping during the day. Genius.
full member
Activity: 714
Merit: 114
I will never join a signature campaign.

1) They are destroying the forum.  I can't tag shitposters who just want the same thing - wearing a signature.  
2) I've shitposted, if I was aggravated or exhausted (or come home from the bar).  I don't always want to explain myself in length, usually yet again.

Nice. Thanks for being a good person vod Smiley  
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Still, please explain how admins make money from extra traffic? New participants have nothing to do with the forum finances. It's been publicly said that money is earnt from mainly advertising, not new registrants.

These new participants will be curious about the new ads, and the new sites, and will probably do a lot of clicking.   Admins should set up a PPC price structure.  Smiley
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I will never join a signature campaign.

1) They are destroying the forum.  I can't tag shitposters who just want the same thing - wearing a signature.  
2) I've shitposted, if I was aggravated or exhausted (or come home from the bar).  I don't always want to explain myself in length, usually yet again.
member
Activity: 125
Merit: 19
its a normalthing that people use everything for there own profit
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
On the other hand what can you say about them joining on sig camp and busting their competitors and gain fame to have slot on every camp they wish to join?
I joined the campaign before I became a DT member. Any post hoc ratings would be pretty useless.

I imagine that the chances of me being accepted to any campaign are more or less the same as before I joined. The people that are being tagged are not really the ones that we're 'competing with'. They're shitposters. And when you have shitposters that participate in only bounty signature campaigns—which I do not participate in, by the way—running amok throwing trash everywhere, you should stop them.

Like I have stated countless times, what would be the difference if we did stop participating? Here's how I assume it'll go down:

1) We leave our signature campaigns.
2) It now becomes assumed that we have alts.
3) Our "alts" are obviously competing with everyone we have tagged
4) Everything remains the same except now instead of the actmyname and The Pharmacist account being accused of this inane conspiracy, it's our "alts" Roll Eyes



Here's something: if I did want to abuse my position, I would tag people who are actually in the campaigns I want to join. But whoop-de-doo, how is it that everyone in ChipMixer is still in? It's because there is no conspiracy.
member
Activity: 135
Merit: 10
i was thinking a long time ago that the pharmacist and actmyname are both controlled and farmed by the same person.

TP is in America, actmyname is Canadian. Tf?Huh



locations is not accurate and can still be spoofed or faked because account farmers are smart people and they dont use simillar details from their other accounts.



Also, I don't quite know how the forum benefits from new members coming in. Remember, it's members. Not traffic. If accounts get negged, they will be left, and new accounts will be created. This does NOT result in a higher traffic density.
the forum will get more traffic because of new registrants and that simply means more earnings. if accounts get negged they will still be used along with newly created accounts. why?  because some other campaigns especially on altcoins section are less strict and they still allowed accounts with a negative trust.

Still, please explain how admins make money from extra traffic? New participants have nothing to do with the forum finances. It's been publicly said that money is earnt from mainly advertising, not new registrants.


If traffic is money you know why? It's because if advertisers could see if the site had a huge traffic then then they may come along to advertise their product and services. And that's why you can see some advertisement header on this furom..

Your a campaign manager why you didn't know that?Huh
member
Activity: 68
Merit: 32
i was thinking a long time ago that the pharmacist and actmyname are both controlled and farmed by the same person.

TP is in America, actmyname is Canadian. Tf?Huh



locations is not accurate and can still be spoofed or faked because account farmers are smart people and they dont use simillar details from their other accounts.



Also, I don't quite know how the forum benefits from new members coming in. Remember, it's members. Not traffic. If accounts get negged, they will be left, and new accounts will be created. This does NOT result in a higher traffic density.
the forum will get more traffic because of new registrants and that simply means more earnings. if accounts get negged they will still be used along with newly created accounts. why?  because some other campaigns especially on altcoins section are less strict and they still allowed accounts with a negative trust.

Still, please explain how admins make money from extra traffic? New participants have nothing to do with the forum finances. It's been publicly said that money is earnt from mainly advertising, not new registrants.


You cannot  increase your price on advertisement if you have a poor traffic...



Anyway back to the topic, I believe it is their rights to join campaign, they are no difference than majority of members here, though they had given the privilege to be in the circle of the default trust.  I never find it being biased because there are lots of campaign out there that is short of people and not that strict as one of the reply here said.  And FYI, bitcoin signature campaign pays way smaller than altcoin campaigns  Tongue.  

And tagging people does not benefit them but hate from those account owners.  Who wants to be hated? Anyone?
Pages:
Jump to: