I mean the subject of DT being able to add a red tag next to someone because you don't like them revealing stats on your account.
One example of such Abuse but this is not directly related to only him. I think if he is doing it to silence people many could then adopt this kind of actoin.
This relatively new user marlboroza is trying to silence me presenting or asking for stats
not even specifically about him originally it just happened he was number 1 on the entire board.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48689242The list without Merit sent by the Top 50 Merit Receivers
1. -49.10% marlboroza earned 558 284 Merit from outside the Top 50 Merit Receivers
Who makes NUMBER 1 SPOTn on the ENTIRE board ...he blames me probably but I actually had no idea it would reveal this about him specificallyFor having his merits reduced
the most on the entire board. From the smallest subset analysed yet.
Suddenly when another member is demonstrating many have their merits apparently reduce by near 50% by just having 10 peoples merits taken away .... we are talking 100s and 100s of merits.
He come to this thread apparently not because he is stalking me and using my posts as an excuse to spam his high paying sig (which i challenged him to remove for a year if I would do the same) not going to do that is he
He says he was googling his own name on an obscure search engine THAT HE CANT REMEMBER WHICH ONE..but spelled in incorrectly like i had and arrive at my thread. I mean what are the chances?? What kind of mad junk excuses can these people come up with from time travel to this kind of nonsense.
Then he see's i said I wonder what his own merit score will be when just his top 10 are removed because most of the others stalking me have had theirs done already. Not that I even wanted that thread started (i did not want that one or the one prior started which can be verified) nor to mention it further after I said it was the end of it all on past threads several time.
I mean of course he hates this being already in NUMBER 1 spot for getting so much merit small the smallest subset analysed yet.such moon now is claiming lower down this thread it is nothing to do with merits.... oh really look at the bottom of his post he is still banging on about all of this
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48750243over 2 threads after I said I want to stop going on about it since it had all been discussed and we are going around in circles. Then they made 2 new threads about it all mentioning me in the op or thread title and making it about me. Not that I care but then saying I am going on about it is another crazy load of crap they push out and expect me not to notice what is happening.
the post below that is apparently the red trust worthy one
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48750243Then decides to leave me negative red trust without disproving anything that I have said and trys to then misquote me saying I said things I did not also.
This is flagrant abuse of DT trust and makes the entire system invalid for highlighting scammers.
I would like this new user who seems to abuse this system removed from DT trust unless he can provide a reason why I should have negative trust by defining trolling in the context of all the every single meta thread and this new one and demonstrate anything I have said is wrong.
You can not allow these people to give red DT trust to silence people because they have no answers.
The fact is i had said at least 5 x that I wanted to drop the conversation and they kept making new threads about it and kept asking question about it then said I was spamming for replying to direct accusations and incorrect quotes and misrepresentations of what I had previously said.
This is flagrant abuse of his position which he is clearly not suitable for.
I want him to produce a full and detailed rebuttal of my points of accept it is not trolling and remove the DT trust at once. If he fails that is abuse and he needs to be removed from that position.
No need to comment on this unless you can prove anything that I have claimed is incorrect in detail.
Again bring a full detailed rebuttal of my statements on merit and a full explanation of how after I have said I don't want to discuss it but they are creating more threads and more questions that justifies trolling.
I am not really interested in any other discussions other that specifically on the crucial points here. Comments that do not bring a full and comprehensive argument for the opinions will be ignored since that makes them groundless.
He was not happy about being Number 1 on that reduction list and he is not happy someone started examining scores with just the top 10 removed. He can not give neg trust on some other bullshit when that is clearly the reason.
This is an important thread for the entire DT trust system which also seems like quite a dangerous system leading to central control by a few people.
All action must be explained by him in detail here. I expect to see an iron clad argument for him the motive here is clear and a disgrace.
This is a thread for META - systemic abuse of this DT system and the merit system needs to be attended to directly in his case and in others. I mean if you can prove you do not deserve neg trust it should be removed.
I am not a trader so it does not really damage my account but this is on principle.
Make sure to read all of the previous related threads on this debacle before commenting and I mean all post made in detail. These people are making a mockery of this board all spamming their high paid sigs and acting holier than thou. I challenged any of them to remove sigs for one year if i did the same so they can condemn trying to monetise the board with impunity and
they all refused.