Was I mentioned here a while ago?
Let's call it an early joke. Or a mistake. Did I startle you? 
Topic: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) - page 6. (Read 19724 times)
This mentioning is a mistake, even machine do make mistake talks less of human. I was equally mentioned but when I opened i noticed it was error. @LoyceV trust everything is good at your end?
Was I mentioned here a while ago?
Same here mate, i was confused after i got notification and accessing the link (here) and there's nothing to see my username lol. I checked the ninjastic.space archives but nothing there too https://ninjastic.space/post/63877798
Edit: ah here's the correct one https://ninjastic.space/post/63877803, and it was deleted, probably just a mistake post.
LMAO, I believe every DT1 and DT2 are being mentioned. It's supposed to be the post for Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings, with all 471 users being mentioned. A harmless mistake, funny one actually.
Was I mentioned here a while ago?
Same here mate, i was confused after i got notification and accessing the link (here) and there's nothing to see my username lol. I checked the ninjastic.space archives but nothing there too https://ninjastic.space/post/63877798
Edit: ah here's the correct one https://ninjastic.space/post/63877803, and it was deleted, probably just a mistake post.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
Was I mentioned here a while ago?
Update:
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =1 / -1) (11580 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 65317: bigtimespaghetti (Trust: +16 / =0 / -1) (57 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 115423: Micio (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (283 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 125517: shadallion (Trust: +4 / =0 / -1) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 139084: Danydee (Trust: +3 / =2 / -1) (243 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 147451: klaaas (Trust: +8 / =0 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 235982: mindtrip (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 241548: Rizzrack (Trust: +1 / =1 / -1) (694 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 352429: BitcoinPenny (Trust: # +38 / =3 / -5) (1203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +27 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +4 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +17 / =3 / -1) (1456 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 1073450: Best_Change (Trust: +25 / =8 / -1) (1989 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 1239188: Bttzed03 (Trust: # +0 / =0 / -1) (1137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 1580039: asche (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (1489 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 2542787: N0sferatu (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (78 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =1 / -1) (11580 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 65317: bigtimespaghetti (Trust: +16 / =0 / -1) (57 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 115423: Micio (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (283 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 125517: shadallion (Trust: +4 / =0 / -1) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 139084: Danydee (Trust: +3 / =2 / -1) (243 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 147451: klaaas (Trust: +8 / =0 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 235982: mindtrip (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 241548: Rizzrack (Trust: +1 / =1 / -1) (694 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 352429: BitcoinPenny (Trust: # +38 / =3 / -5) (1203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +27 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +4 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +17 / =3 / -1) (1456 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 1073450: Best_Change (Trust: +25 / =8 / -1) (1989 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 1239188: Bttzed03 (Trust: # +0 / =0 / -1) (1137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 1580039: asche (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (1489 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 2542787: N0sferatu (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (78 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Update:
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =1 / -1) (11565 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 65317: bigtimespaghetti (Trust: +16 / =0 / -1) (57 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 115423: Micio (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (283 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 125517: shadallion (Trust: +4 / =0 / -1) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 139084: Danydee (Trust: +3 / =3 / -1) (233 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 147451: klaaas (Trust: +8 / =0 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 235982: mindtrip (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 241548: Rizzrack (Trust: +1 / =1 / -1) (692 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 352429: BitcoinPenny (Trust: # +38 / =3 / -5) (1203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +27 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +4 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +17 / =3 / -1) (1446 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 1073450: Best_Change (Trust: +25 / =8 / -1) (1977 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 1239188: Bttzed03 (Trust: # +0 / =0 / -1) (1137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 1580039: asche (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (1489 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 2542787: N0sferatu (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (78 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =1 / -1) (11565 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 65317: bigtimespaghetti (Trust: +16 / =0 / -1) (57 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 115423: Micio (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (283 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 125517: shadallion (Trust: +4 / =0 / -1) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 139084: Danydee (Trust: +3 / =3 / -1) (233 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 147451: klaaas (Trust: +8 / =0 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 235982: mindtrip (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 241548: Rizzrack (Trust: +1 / =1 / -1) (692 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 352429: BitcoinPenny (Trust: # +38 / =3 / -5) (1203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +27 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +4 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +17 / =3 / -1) (1446 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 1073450: Best_Change (Trust: +25 / =8 / -1) (1977 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 1239188: Bttzed03 (Trust: # +0 / =0 / -1) (1137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 1580039: asche (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (1489 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 2542787: N0sferatu (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (78 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Update:
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -1) (11563 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 65317: bigtimespaghetti (Trust: +16 / =0 / -1) (57 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 115423: Micio (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (283 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 125517: shadallion (Trust: +4 / =0 / -1) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 139084: Danydee (Trust: +3 / =3 / -1) (229 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 147451: klaaas (Trust: +8 / =0 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 235982: mindtrip (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 241548: Rizzrack (Trust: +1 / =1 / -1) (692 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 352429: BitcoinPenny (Trust: # +38 / =3 / -5) (1203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +27 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +4 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +17 / =3 / -1) (1446 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 1073450: Best_Change (Trust: +25 / =8 / -1) (1974 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 1239188: Bttzed03 (Trust: # +0 / =0 / -1) (1137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 1580039: asche (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (1489 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 2542787: N0sferatu (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (78 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -1) (11563 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 65317: bigtimespaghetti (Trust: +16 / =0 / -1) (57 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 115423: Micio (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (283 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 125517: shadallion (Trust: +4 / =0 / -1) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 139084: Danydee (Trust: +3 / =3 / -1) (229 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 147451: klaaas (Trust: +8 / =0 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 235982: mindtrip (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 241548: Rizzrack (Trust: +1 / =1 / -1) (692 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 352429: BitcoinPenny (Trust: # +38 / =3 / -5) (1203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +27 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +4 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +17 / =3 / -1) (1446 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 1073450: Best_Change (Trust: +25 / =8 / -1) (1974 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 1239188: Bttzed03 (Trust: # +0 / =0 / -1) (1137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 1580039: asche (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (1489 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 2542787: N0sferatu (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (78 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
What we need on the New software is trade count system
That sounds very easy to game. Make a few trades, and plan towards an exit scam. Everything can and will be abused.We should look at the bright side first. Only admin/moderator can give trade count.
I prefer a system with references, where I can make sure what the trades were like. It is not the same thing if someone has 5 positive (trade counts) ratings, where the total value of trading is not more than $50 as well as one trade worth $500.
As far as I know, only the admin and maybe some of the moderators can give a + or - trade count. That's ok as long as everything is simple and only happens a few times a month. Trades take place on Bitcointalk daily and it would be necessary to have moderators just for that, probably as a full-time job.
As far as I know, only the admin and maybe some of the moderators can give a + or - trade count. That's ok as long as everything is simple and only happens a few times a month. Trades take place on Bitcointalk daily and it would be necessary to have moderators just for that, probably as a full-time job.
A general thread/sub-board for trades and a dedicated moderator reduce the work rate by 80%. Every trade starts from $1, the trade system do not care about trade volume only numbers..
What we need on the New software is trade count system ( works perfectly on altcointalk) not feedback system.
I prefer a system with references, where I can make sure what the trades were like. It is not the same thing if someone has 5 positive (trade counts) ratings, where the total value of trading is not more than $50 as well as one trade worth $500.
As far as I know, only the admin and maybe some of the moderators can give a + or - trade count. That's ok as long as everything is simple and only happens a few times a month. Trades take place on Bitcointalk daily and it would be necessary to have moderators just for that, probably as a full-time job.
What we need on the New software is trade count system
That sounds very easy to game. Make a few trades, and plan towards an exit scam. Everything can and will be abused. The feedback system is highly abused even theymos couldn't escape it. Got the taste of what he created. Who's next? Cyrus? Scrape it off for good.
It's becoming more like any other feedback system on the planet. I always consider 99% positive quite good on eBay, and at 94% I start having my doubts. It's just not possible to please everyone.The only feedback systems that still mean something to me are P2P feedback and rating systems; if you see 95%, you know you're getting a genuine Seller/Buyer; anything less than 90% is a bunch of lazy/scam sellers/buyers. It works flawlessly on Binance and OKX; I'm not sure about the others.
What we need on the New software is trade count system ( works perfectly on altcointalk) not feedback system.
The feedback system is highly abused even theymos couldn't escape it. Got the taste of what he created. Who's next? Cyrus? Scrape it off for good.
It's becoming more like any other feedback system on the planet. I always consider 99% positive quite good on eBay, and at 94% I start having my doubts. It's just not possible to please everyone. The only useful system left on the forum is the flag system. Never seen it abused.
The Flag system gets abused a lot, but it doesn't stick. I guess it was designed to avoid the flaws in the feedback system.I'm close to agreeing with Igebotz, although I wouldn't say that the flag system has never been abused. There have been attempts, but mostly every unjustified flag ends up as inactive.
As far as I have noticed, most wrong flags come from not understanding how the flag system works.
Two similar opinion can co-exist..... You don't need to completely be on the same page with me.
Those few failed misuse attempts are the reason the system is almost perfect. It is important to respect community opinion.
The feedback system is highly abused even theymos couldn't escape it. Got the taste of what he created. Who's next? Cyrus? Scrape it off for good.
I'm close to agreeing with Igebotz, although I wouldn't say that the flag system has never been abused. There have been attempts, but mostly every unjustified flag ends up as inactive.
I'm pretty sure we all agree 
See the Flag on my account: someone tried to abuse it, but it didn't work. Or look at the Flag on your account. The Flag system works quite well The only useful system left on the forum is the flag system. Never seen it abused.
The Flag system gets abused a lot, but it doesn't stick. I guess it was designed to avoid the flaws in the feedback system.I'm close to agreeing with Igebotz, although I wouldn't say that the flag system has never been abused. There have been attempts, but mostly every unjustified flag ends up as inactive.
As far as I have noticed, most wrong flags come from not understanding how the flag system works.
The only useful system left on the forum is the flag system. Never seen it abused.
The Flag system gets abused a lot, but it doesn't stick. I guess it was designed to avoid the flaws in the feedback system. Theymos is the ultimate thick skin leader. Which reminds me I should nominate him:
I would have been highly disappointed if theymos were to smite Vod because of a tag.
2. The Thick-Skinned Gang
Allow me to nominate theymos to be part of this gang. What other forum allows users to tag Admin and keep their tagging power? Theymos cares more about what he stands for than his personal reputation.Red is the new color - It's gradually losing value; looking at the list of DT members and most of the red on the forum, none of them are scam-related. Just BS feedback. Campaign managers and traders have stopped looking at them.
The only useful system left on the forum is the flag system. Never seen it abused.
The easy way to verify a PM would be by asking reporting it to a Global Mods, and ask them to confirm authenticity. But that goes off-topic here.
How can I report a PM I didn't send? The point being Theymos was not neutral, and OgNasty took advantage of that to scam thousands of bitcoins.
But this is off topic. As I post more info on the nastyscam website (I update it weekly), I am trying to sit on my hands and not respond to his lies.
I would have been highly disappointed if theymos were to smite Vod because of a tag.
How do you define smite?How can I report a PM I didn't send?
That's what whoever makes the claim could do. Jump to: