Topic: Dying bitcoins (Read 21579 times)
You’re right: lost BTC are lost forever. Some hodlers even comes psychologically unglued and commits suicide because they lost their wallets with BTC. Year by year the amount of BTC reduces but more and more traders and miners want to possess it. That is one of reasons why BTC will always increase in price.
You said you wanted to "increase emission of new dollar banknotes". This is something that congress already does to you today. If you aren't happy with the current rate of emission, just wait a few minutes and it will be higher.
I expected other scenario. Without mediators. But thx anyway.
But loosing 1 bitcoin in the ocean of a maximum of 21.000.000 coins seems significant to me, so not comparable to gold and jewelry.
So only 21000 losses of 1000 coins can happen. That's not much!
But remember that each bitcoins can be divided into 100 million pieces, as needed.So only 21000 losses of 1000 coins can happen. That's not much!
And the more valuable they become, the more careful people will be not to lose them.
Exactly, for if all twenty-one million coins were lost, sans one, that one bitcoin can still be divisible even beyond the hundred millionth mark.
~Bruno~
+1 what hazek and kjj said
-1, coz no usefull info were provided.
You said you wanted to "increase emission of new dollar banknotes". This is something that congress already does to you today. If you aren't happy with the current rate of emission, just wait a few minutes and it will be higher.
+1 what hazek and kjj said
-1, coz no usefull info were provided.
+1 what hazek and kjj said
So next-gen coin should have a protocol that could be adjusted by anyone without breaking the whole system.
We have that, it's called central banking and fiat currencies (FED + dollar, ECB + euro, and so on..)
Really? I'd like to increase emission of new dollar banknotes. What should I do?
Wait a few minutes.
So next-gen coin should have a protocol that could be adjusted by anyone without breaking the whole system.
We have that, it's called central banking and fiat currencies (FED + dollar, ECB + euro, and so on..)
Really? I'd like to increase emission of new dollar banknotes. What should I do?
The subdivision thing cures this entire problem. Let's say 90% of all BTC are destroyed. Now the value of 0.1BTC is approximately the value that 1 BTC used to be, since there are only that many floating around. Life goes on. We're not in trouble of "running out" until like 99.999% of all BTC are destroyed because then there actually wouldn't be enough to go around.
So next-gen coin should have a protocol that could be adjusted by anyone without breaking the whole system.
We have that, it's called central banking and fiat currencies (FED + dollar, ECB + euro, and so on..)
Why the hell every week someone must come up with the same fail idea?
It's not exactly the same. Most of my recent topics were made to find an answer for one important question. And I think I got it.
It's impossible to have consensus regarding protocol changes in Bitcoin. It's a win-or-lose game, no anything in between allowed. So next-gen coin should have a protocol that could be adjusted by anyone without breaking the whole system.
But loosing 1 bitcoin in the ocean of a maximum of 21.000.000 coins seems significant to me, so not comparable to gold and jewelry.
So only 21000 losses of 1000 coins can happen. That's not much!
But remember that each bitcoins can be divided into 100 million pieces, as needed.So only 21000 losses of 1000 coins can happen. That's not much!
And the more valuable they become, the more careful people will be not to lose them.
AMEN!
By the time 1,000,000 coins have been lost, one coin might be worth $1,000,000
People don't tend to lose $1,000,000 worth of anything very often. There will forever be 20 million+ BTC in existence.IMO if things continue to progress well it'll get harder and harder for people to lose coins as there will always be more and more technological innovation happening to prevents this.
True that 
Why the hell every week someone must come up with the same fail idea?
Because the idea of not being able to steal other people's money fills them with great anxiety. Wouldn't it be good to modify the protocol, so any coins that weren't moved for 1000 days (for example) could be returned back into the system and mined again? We would get rid of some issues this way (lost coins, wasted space). Anyone who hoards bitcoins should just transfer the coins from wallet to wallet once a year.
NoNo it's not a good idea. It's a shitty idea
In case it is not clear: NO
Why the hell every week someone must come up with the same fail idea?
This thread is better. It was started quite earlier.
Yes, if you're not looking for updated information... 
I don't get where this argument comes from.
I'm pretty sure it comes from over 2 years ago.
Hello,
You know, back when Satoshi himself (or herself? or themselves?) was/were still participating in dicsussions.
Lost coins only make everyone else's coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone.
Wouldn't it be good to modify the protocol, so any coins that weren't moved for 1000 days (for example) could be returned back into the system and mined again? We would get rid of some issues this way (lost coins, wasted space). Anyone who hoards bitcoins should just transfer the coins from wallet to wallet once a year.
So if I'm going to jail for 10 years, my coins will be stolen from me? Bad idea.Two other threads on the topic from within the last month:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/so-what-happens-to-lost-bit-coins-104422
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lost-bitcoins-109117
This thread is better. It was started quite earlier.
Come-from-Beyond you do realize that you can take the Bitcoin source code, modify it how ever you like and start your own crypto currency that will follow the rules you want it to follow..
If you aren't happy with Bitcoin the way it is, why not do that? We'll all be thankful and move to your currency if it turns out better than Bitcoin!
If you aren't happy with Bitcoin the way it is, why not do that? We'll all be thankful and move to your currency if it turns out better than Bitcoin!
Ok. I'll send u personal invitation. It's almost ready, just tuning minting algo. Should take 2-3 months.
I don't get where this argument comes from. I've seen it many times. Making this argument requires a fatal flaw in logical thinking. Let me explain this in a simple way:
People lose bitcoins -> value of remaining bitcoins go up -> average bitcoin user has less bitcoins -> people lose less bitcoins on average -> price still goes up -> average bitcoin user has again less bitcoins -> people lose less bitcoins on average.
So in the long term this will only cause the price of bitcoins to go up a bit and for people to lose less bitcoins after that. Even in a million years we wouldn't reach 0 bitcoins and as you all should know, bitcoins can be divided to smaller pieces quite effectively.
This argument is broken even without taking into account how educated people are in using Bitcoin. That is entirely irrelevant for countering this argument. Taking care of your bitcoins is a smart thing to do though, so I'm all for it.
People lose bitcoins -> value of remaining bitcoins go up -> average bitcoin user has less bitcoins -> people lose less bitcoins on average -> price still goes up -> average bitcoin user has again less bitcoins -> people lose less bitcoins on average.
So in the long term this will only cause the price of bitcoins to go up a bit and for people to lose less bitcoins after that. Even in a million years we wouldn't reach 0 bitcoins and as you all should know, bitcoins can be divided to smaller pieces quite effectively.
This argument is broken even without taking into account how educated people are in using Bitcoin. That is entirely irrelevant for countering this argument. Taking care of your bitcoins is a smart thing to do though, so I'm all for it.
Jump to: