Topic: Earn up to 0.5btc/month for your signature - page 2. (Read 11556 times)

Who are you talking to? I've never said he was a scammer and it's not just me who's sceptical of him, but it'll be you that's crying when he doesn't pay out or you don't get what you think you're owed.


Seems a lot more this month, but it only seemed like there was a handful of people who signed up for the first week payout. And we don't have his finances so we can't say for sure, but it's possible he might end up paying out more in advertising than what he takes in. It might not seem logical why they would run but look at the other casinos that came and left without even paying the full month advertisers.

I'm not saying he scammed everyone, I'm saying he scammed me. You have the whole story posted here, I can provide screenshots as proof and everything. You be the own judge.

But once again note this: He DID pay almost every of his advertisers, but not ALL of them.

There are definitely more people that is part of his campaign this month. However not -that- many, he should be able to pay for it. The question still remains - will he? I think he loses WAY more than he earns if he doesn't pay. Imagine his whole site reputation gone, and
for what? Not paying a few advertisers? Nah, I don't think he'll run to be honest. Too much time put into this whole thing, and too little
to earn by doing so.

You alone person who is crying This OP is scammer but many are saying he pay them just because of one person we cannot give him scamer batch

But how many people took part? I only see 3 feedbacks left for what was probably less than a weeks worth of posting at what was possibly a lesser rate than what it is now. The real test is if he pays out the legions of people who have been posting all month. We can only wait for that.

I'll go through my experience with the OP and you'll be able to be the judge whether he scammed me or not.

Before the signature rules were re-worked, I joined this programme. I only had 42 activity at the point, and was not technically eligible to participate, but OP then stated that everyone who reached 50 activity BEFORE the payment date ( March 15th. ) could join straight away, no matter what activity they had. I knew I would reach 50 activity before the 15th, so I joined. I made 90 posts, after which the rules about signatures were changed. The OP then changed his own rules, now everyone had to be a member ( 60+ activity ). I knew I wouldn't reach that before the 15th meaning I would not get paid for the posts I made up till that point. I asked the OP in PM if I would get paid for the 90 posts I had previously made, and he answered that everyone would get paid, even those who signed up with too little activity.

I thought that was just fair, and changed my signature to a programme where I would actually get paid for my posts. At the 15th I sent my message, and was refused payment, for having "changed my signature in the middle of the period". What OP implied was that he expected me to have kept his signature in my slot, posting for 17-18 days without being able to get paid for them. Also in the original post right here, there are no rules stated about changing signatures in the middle of the period.

I did not get paid for my 90 posts, and he has stated that he refuses to pay me.

In my opinion this counts as scamming. I don't know about you, but I wasn't paid what I was promised.

Well to my limited understanding this threads OP is not a scammer and I hope that remains the case for obvious reasons.  I've just recently read someone make that claim but don't believe it is valid at this time.

Currently increase your activity and wait until 1 April hope all campaigns updated until then you can check these all here on this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/overview-of-signature-ad-campaigns-333916

I think this offer is canceled though isn't it?
All the other signature campaigns are also looking for higher activity though.

Great oppotunity, a lit bit sad that it's availible only to members with 50 activity 

I think if he thinks some one cheating him he just cut cheaters and pay others is best for him but not paying to all is just bring him in scammers list and now many waiting for this turn on 1 April I sure he pay this time 

Aha, well that's a whole different story.
Since then he seems to have paid everyone he promised though, I checked his trust and some references. Fingers crossed.

Yes, but he terminated it for everyone and refused to pay everybody for posts they'd made. Hence if I was posting and he didn't pay me I'd feel scammed.

Says quite clearly in the rules that only 1 account is allowed.

They paid out for about a week's term and only a few people took part. I think he might've had lower rates then too, so paying out for a handful of people a tiny amount for a weeks worth of posts doesn't mean he will when he's got an army of spammers earning themselves several bitcoins, but I hope he proves my scepticism wrong.


He has the best offer providing he pays out. I wouldn't give him the title of best deal just yet until he's paid out a full months term. Every single deal that has offered more than Stunna previously has turned out to be a scam. I'm not saying Ritz will, but it usually pays to be sceptical until proven otherwise.


Check his feedback and previous thread. I think there was a couple of people who didn't get paid because he cancelled the deal abruptly because he was pissed people were abusing it by signing up with multiple accounts.

When did he scam people? Links, sources? I haven't heard about it at least. I just saw last month's payment made.

Competition is very important because monopoly hurt every where in life but currently all are scary with RGC because of his few month back scam but now we have just 8 days then can talk whats going here in this competition

Ritz has the best offer for everyone at the moment, that's why I'm using it. If some competitors turn up, we'll deal with that then. But at the moment nobody is near matching RGC, that's why more and more people are moving there. As long as they keep the good rates and pay out next month I think a lot of people will move.

4 from Stunna compared to 6 from a new casino is good but when you are a Member or a Full Member you get 0.0001 from Stunna compared to 0.0004 from RGC so staying with Stunna is hard

Stunna is implementing giving links that will give some revenue from the refs gambling so it is a nice bonus for PD

Exactly. Most people would take 4 from Stunna than risk 6 from Ritz. Even if he does pay out I'd still rather take less from Stunna than take the risk every month with him.


Well, that's what you're hoping. His attitude and behaviour doesn't give me much faith, trust or respect for the guy. It'll take quite some time to build up a reliable rep, and even if he does pay out doesn't mean he won't disappear in a few months.


See above. He already did change his rates, but then changed them again. He's stated he's waiting for confirmed payouts before changing them yet again though.