Thanks, xDan. I appreciate it. Sorry for being offline for a while -- I didn't realize this was still being discussed. I had an out-of-state family member in the ICU for a week, and then a family member's funeral about 1000 miles away. So I've been out town for most of the past few weeks.
The reason I still hadn't announced the software was that I haven't had enough time to test it to the fullest extent. But if people really want to use the implementation as is (early alpha), I'd recommend using this link I've put up for the online portion (if you decide not to run that locally). It's the same as the copy posted above but it's over SSL:
https://bitcoin-secured.comSince the link that emergenz posted is not SSL-encrypted, it could pose a big risk for these types of transactions. Someone could easily swap out Bitcoin addresses of the non-SSL link using mitm. The site I put up above is SSL-encryped. If you're comfortable using alpha quality software, you can ignore the notice since this is the same implementation as emergenz posted (except he had removed my alpha software notice or used an earlier version).
Since there is interest, I'll try to test this some more and remove the alpha warning. But please realize that this is all alpha quality software (including the copy of the program posted by emergenz), and I can make no guarantees. Personally, I use and recommend Armory for offline signing of significant amounts at this point, although I may move to my implementation as my main offline signer after some additional work and testing.
EDIT: After thinking about it, I'd recommend that no one use any version of this software until I have some more time to look over it tonight (28 May 2013). I'll post here tomorrow when it's ready.