Topic: Ebola will come if airlines will not stop to fly to Africa - page 2. (Read 3756 times)

Fortunately for us, the flaw in the idea of formal government is that governments are made of people, people who are often extremely ungoverned themselves. This is why many revolutions and rebellions win.

Governments are not that powerful. If they were, they would never fall.

Many of the long-lived governments that we see in the past, are really a succession of governments, all differing from each other, but we still call them by the same name, making it look like a particular government lasted a long time. Consider the different dynasties of Egyptian pharaohs. Even the different Caesars of Rome controlled different Roman governments at times.

And China. We see a "one-word" China. Yet its governments have been varied and multiple over the last 3,000 years.

I have my doubts that Governments would touch this issue... they would rather let people die and divert attention away from the transmission source, rather than destabilize their own currency and economies.
Probably why not many have considered this aspect what could happen nor want to consider it.

Can you imagine the long term global economic ramifications if someone actually proved and verified that theory?

Never thought of this. Internet Bitcoin money might be the recipient of a gigantic boost when governments start limiting currency to the Net. I should probably get a smartphone, and some more bitcoins.

People on airplanes are the least of my concern.... lets get really scary! Oh and it has to relate to BTC too!!!!!


I have been watching how the authorities handle people with EBOLA here in the USA... they are incinerating everything they touch, everything in their homes.
Well I suppose on the surface that is the right way to be safe, but the only problem is. If Ebola is really so contagious and so easy to pass around and
transmitted through body fluids off of "objects" the person touched... then what about Currency? You know Paper Bills? Fiat or whatever else you want to call it.

Think about it... an Ebola Carrier no matter where they are in the world, starts feeling badly, lets say running a fever, sneezing and so on and so forth,
Alot of the times they will head to the Pharmacy for some remedy... Pays cash and the cash goes into the till. Someone else comes along gets the bill
in change and then goes and spends it somewhere else.

Or the Ebola Carrier gets off the plane, buys a drink in the airport or takes a taxi some place or whatever, getting currency into the system.
That infected? Currency Bill gets passed around oh say 10 times in the 72 hour period they say Ebola Virus can live on the surface of things.
That bill is the perfect conduit of passing the virus around more than anyone on an airplane can pass it around.  

It may sound far fetched maybe it is? but... why would the Authorities be seizing everything an Ebola Carrier has and burning it... if they didnt believe that to be the case?
Many scientist have speculated the Spanish Flu of 1918 that killed 10s of millions of people was passed around via currency also.


Now you want to be scary... there is your scary Ebola Scenario and if it were to be proved to be true, can you imagine the populace reaction to currencies and the alternative
methods of paying for things?

That is a really bad idea.
I dont have any better idea but, I think isolating Africa was really bad idea.

The reason Obama sent troops rather than doctors to Africa to fight Ebola is that he doesn't believe that there is a cure... or that is what he is indication by his actions, anyway. The troops have been dispatched to execute anyone who has Ebola over there, at least if they are in a position that they might spread the disease.

I wonder what the real reason behind the troops is, since Ebola is patented in the States.

That is not a good idea , isolating some africa countries will make it harder to respond to Ebola.
That will not stop a virus. If airlines stop flying to Africa, we can’t get the people that we need to combat this outbreak, and we can’t get the food and the fuel and other supplies that people there need to survive.”

Normally I'd say that it doesn't really matter, because all the chemicals that governments are spraying into the air called chemtrails, that are weakening people's immune systems, will allow us to die by all kinds of other diseases anyway, simply because of our weakened immune systems. But the fact that Ebola is patented shows us that they are preparing for mass extinction of people around the world without chemtrails.

While it isn't proven yet, I think that we will find that 3 of the best protections against Ebola and chemtrail weakening of the immune systems are, ozone therapy, hydrogen peroxide therapy, and Jim Humble's MMS (http://educate-yourself.org/cn/humblemmsandcancer07jan12.shtml, http://jimhumble.org/, http://mmsnews.org/). Why? Because these three are curing people of all kinds of diseases, way better than anything that doctors and hospitals generally offer.

Why don't doctors use them? Because they are cheaper than all get-out. If doctors even let it be known what these 3 could do, it would take the profits of Big Pharma down to near $zero, and the medical as we know it would be destroyed.

 

Well in my country Italy there are some regional councils that are thinking about closing local borders, lol. It's completely pointless and stupid, but media around here are making a good job at scaring people, as always. It was the same story with SARS years ago, eveyone panicked and you could see people in the streets wearing surgical masks.

^ But then he wouldn't have anything to post! xD
Maybe they could get away with some of those killings, but someone would notice it happening sooner or later. And there would be no support for not allowing the troops to return. Of course they could get infected as well, but even then. : /

Don't be daft. Nothing of the sort is going on. Don't be the typical internet poster, posting unsubstantiated and baseless "facts."

Americans know very little about science. It should come as no surprise that they are enacting stupid policy vis-à-vis  Ebola.   

Again, how many people catch HIV from flying?

Every country can say that, and it would just isolate the affected countries. But it wouldn't stop people from those countries to cross land borders anyway, and make the spread of the disease harder to track. And then the people that would leave first are those you need to stay there to keep the economy working and the country running. It would just make the situation worse. : /

That's why Obama sent troops rather than doctors and nurses to Africa to fight ebola. If they find anyone with ebola, they are supposed to shoot on sight and burn the bodies. These troops must know that they can never come back.

Well of course the New York Times cares
It's part of the constant news stream on their friends there  

That said Ebola is gradually getting spread so still worth watching in the long term.

Someone cares about North Korea? 

I believe that those flying to the USA and EU from the most affected countries should be quarantined.
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/10/25/health/us-ebola/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
Hundreds of millions people in the USA and EU have the right NOT to be infected with Ebola, or to quote Spock:
"the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few"

Well I'm not concerned about Ebola spreading around the world, after all a virus gotta do what a virus gotta do. What interests me however, is what goes through the mind of such a magnificent virus in it's spare time, that is when it's not efficiently, methodically destroying other living beings. Food for thought? 

Well that or you can just do a North Korea
Complete Airboycott regardless of country of origin that one sort of amused me
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/24/world/asia/north-korea-to-bar-foreign-tourists-over-ebola-fears.html