What would the point be? Satoshi Nakamoto might not be who we think it is. It might be a group of people or even a whole secret agency. We
know who created SHA, why not Bitcoin? Satoshi might be a serial killer or a Paedophile or even a group of them... just imagine the
embarrassment, if a Nobel prize is given to Satoshi and it turns out that he or she is someone sinister. Before I get crucified, I am not saying
that he/she or they are bad, but what if they were.
your theories about satoshi doesn't make any sense.
bitcoin code is obviously written by an experienced coder and people knew him back then people like Hal Finney were even in contact with him, characters like what you mentioned can not become a good coder.
No, there's absolutely nothing known about Satoshi, other than what he wrote on this forum (and previously on cryptography mailing list). And it was only ever about Bitcoin, you simply cannot deduce anything else about him, other than that he was one or more humans.
Also, it's well established that he almost certainly
was not an experienced coder, or at least he spent a lot of effort to give the impression he was not. Every experienced coder that has examined the way the 0.1 Bitcoin codebase was structured agrees on that, only an experienced coder that was trying to disguise how experienced they were would have structured Bitcoin 0.1 the way Satoshi did it.
Are there any archived posts on this forum from Satoshi?
hm, looks like he was really trying to hide his trails by pretending that he was a inexperienced coder or even if he really wasn't, he probably had a vision, an idea and tried to learn coding quickly in order to fulfill that idea, that's probably why it's open sourced, so that many more experienced coder can improve what he started.
I don't really know, but what I do know is that knowing the identity of bitcoin creator(s) is the one thing I one to know before I die.