The Austrians don't prefer hard currency to fiat money. They prefer free market money.
It would be great if a private currency (like bitcoin), could achieve stable prices, wouldn't it?
I understand that you prefer deflation to inflation, but sometimes some of you sound like you really like deflation and think it's a good thing.
Anyone wants to say openly that deflation is better than stable prices?
Relative price stability means to stop mood swings in the 'worth of worth' -- so that money today is the same as money tomorrow. Inflation means that the price of goods is 'inflated' to their worth because money is 'worth less' because there's so much of it. Deflation vice versa. If the amount of currency matches the amount of stuff within an economy, then prices remain stable. With me so far?
Then how can you say that bitcoin will be deflationary?
Imagine we're in 2030, bitcoin is the world currency and new bitcoins are not issued anymore. If "the amount of stuff within an economy" increase we would have deflation. But if the "the amount of stuff within an economy" decreases (let's say due to an energy crisis or because mines are empty and rubbish dump full, or ...) we would have inflation. It's impossible to know what the money supply should be in 20 years without having a clue of how the real economy will look like then.
Maybe you can say that that's the reason why we need a central wise authority to issue the money, but I prefer inflation and deflation that emerge "naturally" from the free market than a central authority trying to avoid them artificially.
The federal reserve's objective is to retain 'relative price stability'
Really?
Is not to "save the economy" when things go wrong?
It's amazing how easy to forget is that objective for central bankers.
Who should remind this to the bernanke?