wow BUY for only the low low price of 0.4 BTC ?
hey can i BUY your scam virus ? i prefer to pay cash for my malware LOL
a s s h a t
Topic: Edit message (Read 3073 times)
hilarious lol
he's posts a picture of REAPER
and then the other guys posts a picture of what is clearly a Pooler's CPU miner
uhhhhhhhh ok then
he's posts a picture of REAPER
and then the other guys posts a picture of what is clearly a Pooler's CPU miner
uhhhhhhhh ok then
Quote
Sorry to disappoint you but no i don't believe in god but nor i'am into frauds,
If my pointing at your stupid accusation (NB im not saying this is not a scam) based
on a icon on the desktop makes you think im the same person as OP, well
I am realy sorry Mr. Sherlok but you should go back to investigation school...
If my pointing at your stupid accusation (NB im not saying this is not a scam) based
on a icon on the desktop makes you think im the same person as OP, well
I am realy sorry Mr. Sherlok but you should go back to investigation school...
No. Just that you are defending OP with nearly the same posting count was enough to be suspicious.
If you don't know (which I actually don't believe): This Advanced IP Scanner is mostly used by hacker-wanna-bees.
look he has a ipscanner! he must a l33tz0r h4ck3r!
dear god what's wrong with ppl nowdays...
You don't believe in god (You wouldn't be into any kind of fraud if you did)
You should also delete this supporting account. Too obvious Mr. "l33tz0r h4ck3r"
Sorry to disappoint you but no i don't believe in god but nor i'am into frauds,
If my pointing at your stupid accusation (NB im not saying this is not a scam) based
on a icon on the desktop makes you think im the same person as OP, well
I am realy sorry Mr. Sherlok but you should go back to investigation school...
look he has a ipscanner! he must a l33tz0r h4ck3r!
dear god what's wrong with ppl nowdays...
You don't believe in god (You wouldn't be into any kind of fraud if you did)
You should also delete this supporting account. Too obvious Mr. "l33tz0r h4ck3r"
look he has a ipscanner! he must a l33tz0r h4ck3r!
dear god what's wrong with ppl nowdays...
Primes/s is a completely useless metric...
From your screenshots:
5-chains seems to be less than what an I7 on HP-builds gives
9-chains not displayed in your screenshot, but this is what chains/day tries to estimate in the CPU-miner. You can get >=1.0 with an I7, which means an estimated 1 block per week at diff >= 9.8. Based on the 8-chains performance, this doesn't look too good.
Reaper updates every second and every second there be a couple of 5-6-7-8 chains!From your screenshots:
5-chains seems to be less than what an I7 on HP-builds gives
9-chains not displayed in your screenshot, but this is what chains/day tries to estimate in the CPU-miner. You can get >=1.0 with an I7, which means an estimated 1 block per week at diff >= 9.8. Based on the 8-chains performance, this doesn't look too good.
jhPrimeminer is much slower.
My i5 gives "primespersec" : 2695 in HP10
what you mean "5-chains seems to be less than what an I7 on HP-builds gives"?
Do you mean in HP-builds displaing 5-chains in primespersec command?
Na, the numbers for the chains on the screenshots are per HOUR and not per second. You certainly don't have 8-chains every second, otherwise you would find a block every 5 minutes at least.
Since the reaper sourcecode leaked, it's easy to proof:
in App.cpp:
Quote
for(uint i=2; i<15; ++i)
{
if (chainspersec > 0)
{
double num = 3600.0*chainspersec/((ticker()-starttime)*0.001);
string str = SIize(num);
cout << str << " " << i << "-chains ";
}
}
{
if (chainspersec > 0)
{
double num = 3600.0*chainspersec/((ticker()-starttime)*0.001);
string str = SIize(num);
cout << str << " " << i << "-chains ";
}
}
If you run the hp builds with "-printmining -printtoconsole" you'll see primemeter every now and then, which also gives 5-chains per hour estimates. I think I get around 600 5-chains / h on an older Intel I7.
Also:
Quote
My i5 gives "primespersec" : 2695 in HP10
Means 2695*3600 = 9702000 primes per hour. So the 15 million primes per hour (and not second!) is actually not even 2x faster than your i5. Primes per hour is still a pretty useless metric to begin with, since you can tweak the settings so that you get more primes but less chains. Estimated blocks per day/week/month or whatever is the only thing that counts.
Пpимepнo тaкyю жe epyндy выклaдывaли кaк gpuminer для Quarkcoin.
http://satoshibox.com/5219dae04c347bd8290041a7
Знaкoмый пoвёлcя и кyпил и в итoгe в apxивe вoт чтo oкaзaлocь
http://satoshibox.com/5219dae04c347bd8290041a7
Знaкoмый пoвёлcя и кyпил и в итoгe в apxивe вoт чтo oкaзaлocь
you need > diff which is 9.8 so 0.98 
What does this mean? I didnt find a block or was it an instant orphan. lol
Who made this? Smells scammy
OK here i got 80M with 7950, so that would mean i should aks 2BTC! come on ppl be quick 
Primes/s is a completely useless metric...
From your screenshots:
5-chains seems to be less than what an I7 on HP-builds gives
9-chains not displayed in your screenshot, but this is what chains/day tries to estimate in the CPU-miner. You can get >=1.0 with an I7, which means an estimated 1 block per week at diff >= 9.8. Based on the 8-chains performance, this doesn't look too good.
Reaper updates every second and every second there be a couple of 5-6-7-8 chains!From your screenshots:
5-chains seems to be less than what an I7 on HP-builds gives
9-chains not displayed in your screenshot, but this is what chains/day tries to estimate in the CPU-miner. You can get >=1.0 with an I7, which means an estimated 1 block per week at diff >= 9.8. Based on the 8-chains performance, this doesn't look too good.
jhPrimeminer is much slower.
My i5 gives "primespersec" : 2695 in HP10
what you mean "5-chains seems to be less than what an I7 on HP-builds gives"?
Do you mean in HP-builds displaing 5-chains in primespersec command?
Na, the numbers for the chains on the screenshots are per HOUR and not per second. You certainly don't have 8-chains every second, otherwise you would find a block every 5 minutes at least.
Since the reaper sourcecode leaked, it's easy to proof:
in App.cpp:
Quote
for(uint i=2; i<15; ++i)
{
if (chainspersec > 0)
{
double num = 3600.0*chainspersec/((ticker()-starttime)*0.001);
string str = SIize(num);
cout << str << " " << i << "-chains ";
}
}
{
if (chainspersec > 0)
{
double num = 3600.0*chainspersec/((ticker()-starttime)*0.001);
string str = SIize(num);
cout << str << " " << i << "-chains ";
}
}
If you run the hp builds with "-printmining -printtoconsole" you'll see primemeter every now and then, which also gives 5-chains per hour estimates. I think I get around 600 5-chains / h on an older Intel I7.
Also:
Quote
My i5 gives "primespersec" : 2695 in HP10
Means 2695*3600 = 9702000 primes per hour. So the 15 million primes per hour (and not second!) is actually not even 2x faster than your i5. Primes per hour is still a pretty useless metric to begin with, since you can tweak the settings so that you get more primes but less chains. Estimated blocks per day/week/month or whatever is the only thing that counts.
пpoгa нe paбoтaeт, инcтpyкция пo cyти cocтoит из oднoй cтpoчки.
пpoшy вepнyть 0.4 btc
*********пpoшy вepнyть 0.4 btc
Cтpoчeк тaм бoльшe, нyжнo выпoлнить вce ycлoвия для тoгo чтoбы вce paбoтaлo. И нeпpeмeннo влoжeнный тyдa zlib1.dll (этиx библиoтeк мнoгo вepcий cyщecтвyeт, нo нe нa вcex paбoтaeт).
Я никoгo нe зacтaвляю пoкyпaть. Этo тoт жe мaйнep чтo пpoдaвaлcя paзpaбoтчикoм REAPER, мнoгиe мyчaютcя, пoкa нe зacтaвят eгo paбoтaть. Я peшил yпpocтить зaдaчy (я пoтpaтил 2 чaca чтoб oнa paбoтaлa). У мeня y caмoгo мнoгo вoпpocoв к paзpaбoтчикy пo пpoгpaммe.
*********
There is 5 lines of instructions, you need to fulfill all the conditions for this to work. And you need use zlib1.dll which I copy in the folder with reaper (many versions of these libraries exist, but not all work).
I do not force anyone to buy. This is the same miner that sold by the developer REAPER, many suffer until they make it work. I decided to simplify the task (I spend 2 hours). I myself have a lot of questions to the developer of the program.
нy нe знaю. я жe пoкyпaл y вac. и вoпpocы к вaм.
вce ycлoвия из инcтpyкции выпoлнeны.
a кaк я мoг yзнaть чтo oнa нe paбoтaeт дo тoгo кaк кyпил?
пpoгa нe paбoтaeт, инcтpyкция пo cyти cocтoит из oднoй cтpoчки.
пpoшy вepнyть 0.4 btc
пpoшy вepнyть 0.4 btc
did you also notice that fermats/s is ZEROOOOOOO!!!!
and 1.6K gandalf's magick!
what do you mean by "found"?
did you also notice that fermats/s is ZEROOOOOOO!!!!
Primes/s is a completely useless metric...
From your screenshots:
5-chains seems to be less than what an I7 on HP-builds gives
9-chains not displayed in your screenshot, but this is what chains/day tries to estimate in the CPU-miner. You can get >=1.0 with an I7, which means an estimated 1 block per week at diff >= 9.8. Based on the 8-chains performance, this doesn't look too good.
From your screenshots:
5-chains seems to be less than what an I7 on HP-builds gives
9-chains not displayed in your screenshot, but this is what chains/day tries to estimate in the CPU-miner. You can get >=1.0 with an I7, which means an estimated 1 block per week at diff >= 9.8. Based on the 8-chains performance, this doesn't look too good.
Jump to: