The author of this topic had posted it last May. The price was not expected to reach these record levels, so El Salvador will record a loss of millions of dollars compared to the price at which it was bought.
What is remarkable about the matter is that the Salvadoran president had already announced his intention to buy more, taking advantage of the low price.
El Savador announce to public when first time adopt bitcoin as legal currency transaction, but little mistake made because when bitcoin still higher price really hurry for investing and not waiting when bitcoin price drop.
Huh? your comment makes almost NO sense at all, except that you are imputting knowledge onto El Salvador as if it was supposed to have had known the future and that bitcoin prices were going to drop from its couple of purchases of BTC that were done late last year at $50k and above.
How the fuck are they supposed to know that BTC prices are going to drop back down?
And another thing, you are proclaiming that El Salvador bought BTC higher than $50k and those purchases of BTC at those higher than $50k prices were mistakes; however, you know that El Salvador also made around eight purchases of bitcoin below $50k - including a couple of purchases in the $30ks and one purchase around $19k.
You even commented on the chart (
here's a link to your response) that had been posted by DdmrDdmr.
The chart that DdmrDdmr had posted - attached below for ease of reference:I don't see have chance for El Savador keep profitable when investing with bitcoin trough made investment when bitcoin still above $50,000. How many time try to buy back and El Savador keep make bitcoin as long term assets investment not give chance how take profit every great moment.
I was about to swear again, but I will restrain myself a wee bit in order to attempt to describe this in a bit less of a shouting way.
Do you happen to understand the idea of long-term investing that attempts to establish a long-term position that involves ongoing accumulation of an asset until such position is established, in this case bitcoin?
In that regard, there is no real evidence that short-term profits and short-term trading would be a preferred strategy prior to establishing both a decent position and also making sure that the asset is sufficiently in profits.
Of course, there can be all kinds of variation in terms of how a country, institution or individual would go about BTC accumulation in terms of dollar cost averaging, lump sum investing and buying on dips, and likely countries and institutions are less able to be fucking around with trying to trade their position back and forth - as compared to liberties of individuals so your Monday morning quarterbacking of a country's need to whimsically needing to get in and out of positions seems presumptuous at best.
Furthermore if bitcoin is being accumulated in order to be a hedge against the dollar system, which seems to be part of El Salvador's motivation in getting into bitcoin, then it also makes little to no sense to be selling it - even if you want to impute clairvoyance on El Salvador based on subsequent BTC price moves of the past year-ish and especially of the past several months.
I think El Savador president need to change their mind how keep worth when investing with bitcoin, sell when have chance on top price then later buy back after bitcoin going dump, not always have to be strong hand by holding.
You don't really seem to know what the fuck you are talking about. At what point should El Salvador have had sold in the past, and then at what point should it have had bought back lower?
Are you suggesting that they take a BTC trading strategy into the future too, and in that regard at what points should El Salvador sell some or all of its BTC, and if so, how much should it sell? and if it does sell, when should it buy back?
I am questioning if I should have even been asking these questions from someone like you who seems to be lacking in terms of understanding how there can be reasonable ways to establish a position in an asset (such as BTC) through accumulation and because you seem to believe that there is some value in selling bitcoin during an accumulation phase in order to pray to buy back lower rather than just continuing to buy (such as DCA, buying on dips and lump sum).. and yeah.. HODLing too.
Maybe you should outline a somewhat comprehensive plan regarding what approach is going to allow El Salvador (and I suppose anyone else too?) to continue to accumulate more bitcoin without running into the frequent dumbass errors that traders tend to encounter on a fairly regular basis. Do you believe that because El Salvador is a country, they would be in a better position if they were trading bitcoin rather than merely accumulating it through buying and HODLing? Presumptively creating some kind of a Bitcoin trading (management position that would make those kinds of trading calls, or do you believe that Bukele personally should make those kinds of trading calls concerning when and how much to sell BTC and to when and how much to buy back moar BTC later
(in theory)?