Electrum 4.3.0 Relased | Bitcointalksearch.org

nc50lc

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 5531

Self-proclaimed Genius

Quote from: hemzer on October 01, 2022, 12:26:15 AM

send works

but how do you receive in electrum given a LN URL withdrawl.
Where do I put a LNURL-withdraw URL on the electrum wallet?

I replied to your thread with the reason why Electrum wont accept LNURL-withdraw requests.
Shortcut to the reply: /index.php?topic=5415508.msg61040926#msg61040926

hemzer

jr. member

Activity: 43

Merit: 7

Thanks.
send works

but how do you receive in electrum given a LN URL withdrawl.
Where do I put a LNURL-withdraw URL on the electrum wallet?

I am on linux

DireWolfM14

copper member

Activity: 2170

Merit: 4238

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: hemzer on September 30, 2022, 01:18:52 PM

OK, I get that part.
but where do I use it in the electrum desktop wallet?

If you're using Windows you should be able to start Electrum, go to the playground site, click on the link labeled "LNURL-pay," and the invoice will populate the "Send" tab in Electrum client. This assumes that your OS is set to associate the Electrum client with links that start with bitcoin: or lightning:.

Instead of left-clicking on the link in the Playground site, you can right-click, copy link address, then paste that into the "Pay To" field on the "Send" tab in the Electrum client. This will need to be done if your OS doesn't have any client software associated with bitcoin links.

ETA; The automated functions will only work if you've installed Electrum using the electrum-4.3.2-setup.exe, not the stand-alone version.

hemzer

jr. member

Activity: 43

Merit: 7

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on September 30, 2022, 01:14:00 PM

Quote from: hemzer on September 30, 2022, 01:00:10 PM

Sorry, but where is this link "clicking on LNURL-pay" I dont see it in the UI.

You won't find the link in the Electrum UI, the link I was referring to is displayed on the playground site that I provided a link to: https://lnurl.fiatjaf.com/

That site produces a variety of LNURL links, one of them is labeled "LNURL-pay." It's just a way to test if the links can be used with your wallet.

OK, I get that part.
but where do I use it in the electrum desktop wallet?

DireWolfM14

copper member

Activity: 2170

Merit: 4238

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: hemzer on September 30, 2022, 01:00:10 PM

Sorry, but where is this link "clicking on LNURL-pay" I dont see it in the UI.

You won't find the link in the Electrum UI, the link I was referring to is displayed on the playground site that I provided a link to: https://lnurl.fiatjaf.com/

That site produces a variety of LNURL links, one of them is labeled "LNURL-pay." It's just a way to test if the links can be used with your wallet.

hemzer

jr. member

Activity: 43

Merit: 7

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on September 30, 2022, 12:56:50 PM

Quote from: hemzer on September 30, 2022, 11:25:02 AM

Quote

* In addition, the following new features are worth noting:

- support for LNURL-pay (LUD-06) (#7839)

Hi I downloaded 4.3.2 but I do not see anywhere the support for LNURL.
What am I missing please?

I'm still running 4.3.1, but it seems to be working fine for me. Are you sure you're entering the correct url? I haven't used LNURL-pay myself, but here's a link to a "playground": https://lnurl.fiatjaf.com/

Once Electrum is up and running, clicking on LNURL-pay link populates the data in the Send tab in Electrum. Then I just need to click on "Get Invoice" button and it loads the transaction and prepares it for signing.

Sorry, but where is this link "clicking on LNURL-pay" I dont see it in the UI.

DireWolfM14

copper member

Activity: 2170

Merit: 4238

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: hemzer on September 30, 2022, 11:25:02 AM

Quote

* In addition, the following new features are worth noting:

- support for LNURL-pay (LUD-06) (#7839)

Hi I downloaded 4.3.2 but I do not see anywhere the support for LNURL.
What am I missing please?

I'm still running 4.3.1, but it seems to be working fine for me. Are you sure you're entering the correct url? I haven't used LNURL-pay myself, but here's a link to a "playground": https://lnurl.fiatjaf.com/

Once Electrum is up and running, clicking on LNURL-pay link populates the data in the Send tab in Electrum. Then I just need to click on "Get Invoice" button and it loads the transaction and prepares it for signing.

hemzer

jr. member

Activity: 43

Merit: 7

Quote

* In addition, the following new features are worth noting:

   - support for LNURL-pay (LUD-06) (#7839)

Hi I downloaded 4.3.2 but I do not see anywhere the support for LNURL.
What am I missing please?

nc50lc

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 5531

Self-proclaimed Genius

Quote from: Cricktor on August 16, 2022, 01:33:34 PM

Can anybody else confirm this?

Yes, it only appears in the sender's history if the URI is copied.
The good news is: they already patched it right after this issue was posted (by AbdussamadA): https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/7919

Cricktor

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 1010

Crypto Swap Exchange

I observed something odd with Electrum 4.3.0 (tested with Linux AppImage binary):
When I create a request to receive coins and enter some details in the Description field, click on button Create Request and a transaction is made to the provided receiving address, the text in Description is not carried over to the Description field in the History tab, not into the Label field in the Addresses tab, nor in the Label field in Coins tab.

This has worked before in Electrum 4.2.3 properly. Seems like some degression in the unified receive request.

Can anybody else confirm this?

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on August 06, 2022, 03:12:15 PM

Another comment in that thread has me confused, unless I'm missing something; a user mentioned that he no longer wants to use segwit addresses. Why? I know about the bech32 v0 flaw with the checksums, but I reckon the chances of that resulting in a loss of funds are rather remote. I don't think segwit addresses are any more vulnerable to clipboard malware than any other address, and if you don't go around swapping your p's and q's I think you'll be fine. Again, I may be missing something, and if so I hope someone will enlighten me.

The Q and P are part of the address data (not the human readable part or separator), so given that Bech32 can error-correct up to 4 characters, swapping Ps and Qs should be a non-issue.

DireWolfM14

copper member

Activity: 2170

Merit: 4238

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: hosseinimr93 on August 06, 2022, 03:46:54 PM

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on August 06, 2022, 03:12:15 PM

Another comment in that thread has me confused, unless I'm missing something; a user mentioned that he no longer wants to use segwit addresses. Why?

Are you talking about the comment made by the user with the name of nbourbon?
If so, I think he/she doesn't want to use segwit addresses just because he/she thinks that it's better to use taproot addresses. I don't think that's due to a flaw in segwit addresses.
Maybe, that user doesn't know that with using taproot addresses instead of native segwit addresses, he/she will have to pay more fee for many of the transactions.

Yeah, that's the one. Maybe I misinterpreted the concern. I want to use taproot also, but probably not enough to switch from electrum to another client. I do run core on my PC as well, I can always grab a taproot address from there if needed. But like you said, taproot will be more practical once more services and users have implemented it. It took a while for most to adopt native segwit, so I imagine that we'll be waiting a couple of years before v1 addresses are ready for prime time.

Saint-loup

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 2348

Quote from: PX-Z on August 05, 2022, 06:51:02 PM

New electrum version is released. This release is focused on improvement of Lightning UI and finally the support of the Blockstream Jade hardware wallet^[1].

Quote from: Electrum Release Notes (Github.com)

# Release 4.3.0 - (August 5, 2022)

* This version introduces a set of UI modifications that simplify the
   use of Lightning. The idea is to abstract payments from the payment
   layer, and to suggest solutions when a lightning payment is hindered
   by liquidity issues.
[...]
   - A single balance is shown in the GUI. A pie chart reflects how
   that balance is distributed (on-chain, lightning, unconfirmed,
   frozen, etc).

This new GUI feature is a really good idea IMO, because before it wasn't very clear how much funds of your balance was available for on-chain payments, and how much funds was preempted by LN channels, and if you didn't pay attention you could get bad surprises when you wanted to make some payments.

PX-Z

hero member

Activity: 1428

Merit: 836

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: nc50lc on August 06, 2022, 12:42:11 AM

It looks bulky in the pictures since it's scaled with your monitor and it's hard to judge the size of a picture of an object without a reference.

Yeah, you're right. I've watch some video reviews, Although trezor and ledger is much smaller, yet not as big as other existing HW out there like the ellipal and keepkey. It is I guess the cheapest ones in the market.

Quote from: dkbit98 on August 06, 2022, 04:54:24 PM

but it's nice to see Electrum devs are constantly improving their wallet.

One of the open source bitcoin wallets that has active development which make them the best wallet aside from core ^{(a heavy duty wallet)}.

dkbit98

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 7064

Cashback 15%

Quote from: PX-Z on August 05, 2022, 06:51:02 PM

New electrum version is released. This release is focused on improvement of Lightning UI and finally the support of the Blockstream Jade hardware wallet^[1].

I will wait few more days before updating, but it's nice to see Electrum devs are constantly improving their wallet.
Next on the list should be support for Taproot addresses.

Quote from: PX-Z on August 05, 2022, 06:51:02 PM

Although i just heard this new hardware wallet, it looks like neat but like a bulk remote to me. Lol
To those who keep collecting hardware wallets, making reviews, using the liquid network, i guess its must to try.

It's not really new hardware wallet, it was released and made some time ago by Blockstream and it's basically M5StickV ESP32 device.
Similar devices can be found for same price and almost identical design and Jade code can be imported manually, so it's better to buy this instead connecting your identity with one more hardware wallet.
Order several hardware wallets on same address and name, and you could easily be target of attackers and scammers in future.

hosseinimr93

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 5213

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on August 06, 2022, 03:12:15 PM

Another comment in that thread has me confused, unless I'm missing something; a user mentioned that he no longer wants to use segwit addresses. Why?

Are you talking about the comment made by the user with the name of nbourbon?
If so, I think he/she doesn't want to use segwit addresses just because he/she thinks that it's better to use taproot addresses. I don't think that's due to a flaw in segwit addresses.
Maybe, that user doesn't know that with using taproot addresses instead of native segwit addresses, he/she will have to pay more fee for many of the transactions.

DireWolfM14

copper member

Activity: 2170

Merit: 4238

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: nc50lc on August 06, 2022, 01:38:19 AM

Quote from: NotATether on August 06, 2022, 12:58:08 AM

So no Taproot address support yet? Where is that in their release timetable? It shouldn't be too hard to implement since they can just adapt similar code from Bitcoin Core.

It's currently in the "backlog Milestone" so there's no definite release date: github.com/spesmilo/electrum/milestone/12
Also, ecdsa seems to be annoyed by users asking for Taproot support :/ (reference post)

I too was hoping for taproot integration in this release. According to a previous post in that thread by sombernight, some work needs to be done to enable watch only wallets. I imagine that without watch-only, taproot wallets wouldn't work with hardware wallets. I haven't checked on the progress of that particular feature, but I do hope we don't have to wait much longer.

Another comment in that thread has me confused, unless I'm missing something; a user mentioned that he no longer wants to use segwit addresses. Why? I know about the bech32 v0 flaw with the checksums, but I reckon the chances of that resulting in a loss of funds are rather remote. I don't think segwit addresses are any more vulnerable to clipboard malware than any other address, and if you don't go around swapping your p's and q's I think you'll be fine. Again, I may be missing something, and if so I hope someone will enlighten me.

nc50lc

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 5531

Self-proclaimed Genius

Quote from: NotATether on August 06, 2022, 12:58:08 AM

So no Taproot address support yet? Where is that in their release timetable? It shouldn't be too hard to implement since they can just adapt similar code from Bitcoin Core.

It's currently in the "backlog Milestone" so there's no definite release date: github.com/spesmilo/electrum/milestone/12
Also, ecdsa seems to be annoyed by users asking for Taproot support :/ (reference post)

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

So no Taproot address support yet? Where is that in their release timetable? It shouldn't be too hard to implement since they can just adapt similar code from Bitcoin Core.

nc50lc

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 5531

Self-proclaimed Genius

Quote from: PX-Z on August 05, 2022, 06:51:02 PM

Although i just heard this new hardware wallet, it looks like neat but like a bulk remote to me. Lol

Judging from the size of the USB-C port at the bottom side of the HW as well as the 'dimensions' indicated in the "Technical Specifications", the form factor is small.
It looks bulky in the pictures since it's scaled with your monitor and it's hard to judge the size of a picture of an object without a reference.

Topic: Electrum 4.3.0 Relased (Read 286 times)