This was my dilemma. If it's basically old news, why they were published now? Were the journalists so much out of better topics or is there an intention somewhere for this story?
And that's why I thought that maybe it's supposed to be a warning from somebody powerful and annoyed by these tweets.
Or maybe I'm overthinking it
Yeah, way too much overthinking!
If that entity or person was that powerful he would have relayed a message through different channels not leaving a trace that would have linked him to that journalist, really powerful people are not stupid when they want to stay hidden, we're not talking about the usual puppet show they do for the masses.
The WSJ just reached to the SEC to ask if they have indeed taken action against him, and the SEC responded, we've done this and that and we haven't actually done anything. Articles like these won't scare Musk at all, especially since they tell what he knows, that there isn't much they can do about it.
LOL! Maybe only indirectly for crypto, but indeed, the focus will be on TSLA shares and such.
Does he look like the guy concerned about the price of Tesla's shares?
Common, the guy is pure troll material, he would rather see the stocks fall to 1% than shutting up!
As for the herd, I think that the same 1% applies here, with less than that actually owning a tesla or tesla shares, and if the herd wants to follow him, that's their choice, if the herd proves too powerful and numerous and dumb it means the world is fucked up and we're going to have to deal with it.
I hope that SEC could do something about this problem for real. He is really getting on my nerves. He did his manipulation again last night. Someone must put an end to this.
