coercion-free, anarcho-capitalistic ideals that the ancestors of bitcoin advocated.
seems your mentor taught you bad lessons...
bitcoin was libertarian* based not capitalist based
they are cypherpunk, not anarcho based
bitcoin was coercion-free but you and your mentor love the coercion(by cores governance) so seems strange you now admit the opposite as being the old ideals, when for last few years you been idolising the coercion and pretending bitcoin would fail under true coercion free method
(you love the core/NYA 'backward compatibility' consensus bypass tricks)
you seem to love the coercive capitalist methods of core governance, so i find it strange that you say watch out for US gov, whilst you idolise how core are sponsored by the wallstreet guys that are puppets of the US gov regulators
you ask others to now watch out for things, yet for years you have been trying to brush such coercions under the rug and then highlight coercions and celebrate them when it benefitted you.. but never shown any sign of defying/fighting against the coercions of the capitalist governance
.. i am hoping that now your mentor has become more silent on the forum, you are now seeing the light(and your mistakes) thus now thinking for yourself, independently.. and so now are changing your mind/ways.. but last time i seen you try to change, it didnt last long before you went back to your mentors way
*
A cypherpunk is one who advocates the widespread use of strong cryptography and privacy-enhancing technologies as a means of effecting social and political change. The cypherpunk movement originated in the late 1980s and gained traction with the establishment of the "Cypherpunks" electronic mailing list in 1992, where informal groups of activists, technologists, and cryptographers discussed strategies to enhance individual privacy and resist state or corporate surveillance. Deeply libertarian in philosophy, the movement is rooted in principles of decentralization, individual autonomy, and freedom from centralized authority.
..
so with all that said are you now ready to defy the government regulated wallstreet sponsor deals with core devs, used to influence the bitcoin governance.. or do you still support and dont want to stop/change the controllers of bitcoins politics
in short:
are you now ready to care and be concerned with protecting bitcoin from centralised governance, or do you wish to continue ass kissing their agenda(core roadmap) thats sponsored by the fiat bankers and regulators