[EMUNIE] One small step for transactions, one giant leap for crypto - page 3.

Anima

member

Activity: 63

Merit: 10

Quote from: nextgencoin on September 02, 2015, 05:06:26 AM

I thought this developer had already been found to be a scammer, people should research his past threads on this forum. It's not pretty.

If they did, they would actually find he's NOT a scammer.

Please, if you don't mind, post some actual proof (if you have any) and lets take it from that once and for all.

lovely89

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: BigSirko on September 02, 2015, 04:03:14 AM

if Daniel had invested into NXT like he almost did.

He would had said "SFYL" (sorry for your loss) and would had left his baby Peachy & "investors" behind holding an empty bag. Daniel would had left eMunie to be a NXT developer. This really proves that Fuserleer was a greedy chump then and still is today.

Your requirement for proof is beyond laughable.

Quote from: nextgencoin on September 02, 2015, 05:06:26 AM

I thought this developer had already been found to be a scammer, people should research his past threads on this forum. It's not pretty.

All raised concerns have been addressed by Dan. Please continue to read all/entire threads instead of op's.

nextgencoin

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1000

I thought this developer had already been found to be a scammer, people should research his past threads on this forum. It's not pretty.

Anima

member

Activity: 63

Merit: 10

Quote from: BigSirko on September 02, 2015, 04:03:14 AM

if Daniel had invested into NXT like he almost did.

He would had said "SFYL" (sorry for your loss) and would had left his baby Peachy & "investors" behind holding an empty bag. Daniel would had left eMunie to be a NXT developer. This really proves that Fuserleer was a greedy chump then and still is today.

This is just wrong Grin

I think nxt is sad Dan did not invest his time in their project.. not the other way around. Right now, nxt is on a 12th place on coinmarketcap - behind DogeCoin. 'nuff said.

BigSirko

full member

Activity: 201

Merit: 100

if Daniel had invested into NXT like he almost did.

He would had said "SFYL" (sorry for your loss) and would had left his baby Peachy & "investors" behind holding an empty bag. Daniel would had left eMunie to be a NXT developer. This really proves that Fuserleer was a greedy chump then and still is today.

monsterer

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1007

Quote from: Fuserleer on September 01, 2015, 04:35:21 PM

For example if a party was to come and sell a lot of EMU in one shot at a sub market price, where the result of selling that volume would sink the price below a system wide agreed lower threshold, then the system itself would buy that EMU with assets it holds (if it has enough) at the threshold level.

This dominant market maker model of price stabilisation is similar to how nuBits works - the trick is to have more money available than anyone else in the market at all times in order to manipulate the price. However, although eMunie's MM will have more of its native token available than anyone else, where will it get the liquidity for the other side of the market from?

For that matter, where are these trades taking place?

Anima

member

Activity: 63

Merit: 10

Quote from: Peachy on September 01, 2015, 09:32:07 PM

Count me in as another proud investor without issue for over 2 years and I'm willing to wait as long as it takes.

With regard to the development timeline, just remember we've had 6000 years of human-controlled/manipulated currency and all of it's inherent problems. I think taking a few years to build an autonomously decentralized version is more than justified.

As for the baseless criminal accusations. Oh puhLEEZ. I've flown from Texas to the UK to meet with him personally and can 100% vouch for his credibility and acumen.

Like Peachy, i've also trusted Dan with my personal funds for a long period of time and would not hesitate to contribute more. Dan could have launched a long time ago at the peak of the bitcoin hype train back in December 2013 and made much more money than he have ever had in emunie investments. He spends countless days and nights coding - to me, that seems like too much of a hazzle if you want to scam everyone. It would be much easier to finish a gui, crack on a Wordpress template and spend the weekend at the Hilton spending other peoples money.

Fuserleer

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1016

Hehe day starts when I get up, day ends when I go to bed. My days are very dynamic

I hope to have all the major details of the project written and available within the next 4-6 weeks. Obviously with being the lead on all aspects of the project from design, code, business relations, and everything in between, things can and do slip, despite having a great resource of help to call upon.

Even so, the wait should be relatively short, and there will be plenty of juicy reading of other stuff between now and then

LiQio

legendary

Activity: 1181

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Fuserleer on September 01, 2015, 11:46:14 PM

Quote from: LiQio on September 01, 2015, 11:42:39 PM

Quote from: Fuserleer on September 01, 2015, 11:34:32 PM

Quote from: ExtremeFacials.com on September 01, 2015, 11:32:11 PM

Quote from: LiQio on September 01, 2015, 11:22:50 PM

Quote from: Fuserleer on September 01, 2015, 04:35:21 PM

[...]

At go live, the buffer will be credited with 10% of the total amount of currency the system is started with, so if there is 1M EMU at launch, the buffer will be credited with 100,000. This should be enough to cover almost all short term pump/dump movements. The buffer also receives 10% of all new currency being issued, (and in the cases where the buffer is low, system revenue from fees) so as to ensure its purchasing power -> currency ratio is always adequate to guard against "un-natural" movements.

If the case of a supply contraction, buffer assets are burned. If enough can not be burned from the buffer, then EMU is purchased from the DEX, held for a short period in "limbo" and burnt later if the system doesn't return to an expansive state.

That is a VERY simplified explanation of whats going on, there is plenty of further detail required on the algorithms and mechanisms at play to get a fuller understanding, but the above should be enough to at least have an idea.

[...]

Really curious about those "details".
For now I would call it playing with fire.

caveman who played with fire eventually discovered BBQ ribs ... YUMMY!! Much better than raw mammoth steaks, just ask Bear Gryls, that dude drinks his own piss ... I'm sure Bear is just as excited at the prospect of chowing down on some flame grilled EMU as many here on this forum. I respect Fuserleer for playing with fire!!

Hah! You sir, win comment of the day!

Better wait until the day is over with awarding comments.
Playing with fire and being the overhasty type of guy is a dangerous combination Wink

I'm just coming to the end of my shift, almost 6am, so its the end of the day for me Wink

I wouldn't say I was overhasty, the eMunie economic model has been in development for a long long time, as has the rest of the project....a hasty guy would have thrown it together and launched it a long time ago just to make a quick couple of bucks.

Interesting way of defining day.
The overhasty was referring to your comment above not your project or character in general.

BTW still curious about the details.

Fuserleer

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1016

Quote from: LiQio on September 01, 2015, 11:42:39 PM

Quote from: Fuserleer on September 01, 2015, 11:34:32 PM

Quote from: ExtremeFacials.com on September 01, 2015, 11:32:11 PM

Quote from: LiQio on September 01, 2015, 11:22:50 PM

Quote from: Fuserleer on September 01, 2015, 04:35:21 PM

[...]

At go live, the buffer will be credited with 10% of the total amount of currency the system is started with, so if there is 1M EMU at launch, the buffer will be credited with 100,000. This should be enough to cover almost all short term pump/dump movements. The buffer also receives 10% of all new currency being issued, (and in the cases where the buffer is low, system revenue from fees) so as to ensure its purchasing power -> currency ratio is always adequate to guard against "un-natural" movements.

If the case of a supply contraction, buffer assets are burned. If enough can not be burned from the buffer, then EMU is purchased from the DEX, held for a short period in "limbo" and burnt later if the system doesn't return to an expansive state.

That is a VERY simplified explanation of whats going on, there is plenty of further detail required on the algorithms and mechanisms at play to get a fuller understanding, but the above should be enough to at least have an idea.

[...]

Really curious about those "details".
For now I would call it playing with fire.

caveman who played with fire eventually discovered BBQ ribs ... YUMMY!! Much better than raw mammoth steaks, just ask Bear Gryls, that dude drinks his own piss ... I'm sure Bear is just as excited at the prospect of chowing down on some flame grilled EMU as many here on this forum. I respect Fuserleer for playing with fire!!

Hah! You sir, win comment of the day!

Better wait until the day is over with awarding comments.
Playing with fire and being the overhasty type of guy is a dangerous combination Wink

I'm just coming to the end of my shift, almost 6am, so its the end of the day for me Wink

I wouldn't say I was overhasty, the eMunie economic model has been in development for a long long time, as has the rest of the project....a hasty guy would have thrown it together and launched it a long time ago just to make a quick couple of bucks.

LiQio

legendary

Activity: 1181

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Fuserleer on September 01, 2015, 11:34:32 PM

Quote from: ExtremeFacials.com on September 01, 2015, 11:32:11 PM

Quote from: LiQio on September 01, 2015, 11:22:50 PM

Quote from: Fuserleer on September 01, 2015, 04:35:21 PM

[...]

At go live, the buffer will be credited with 10% of the total amount of currency the system is started with, so if there is 1M EMU at launch, the buffer will be credited with 100,000. This should be enough to cover almost all short term pump/dump movements. The buffer also receives 10% of all new currency being issued, (and in the cases where the buffer is low, system revenue from fees) so as to ensure its purchasing power -> currency ratio is always adequate to guard against "un-natural" movements.

If the case of a supply contraction, buffer assets are burned. If enough can not be burned from the buffer, then EMU is purchased from the DEX, held for a short period in "limbo" and burnt later if the system doesn't return to an expansive state.

That is a VERY simplified explanation of whats going on, there is plenty of further detail required on the algorithms and mechanisms at play to get a fuller understanding, but the above should be enough to at least have an idea.

[...]

Really curious about those "details".
For now I would call it playing with fire.

caveman who played with fire eventually discovered BBQ ribs ... YUMMY!! Much better than raw mammoth steaks, just ask Bear Gryls, that dude drinks his own piss ... I'm sure Bear is just as excited at the prospect of chowing down on some flame grilled EMU as many here on this forum. I respect Fuserleer for playing with fire!!

Hah! You sir, win comment of the day!

Better wait until the day is over with awarding comments.
Playing with fire and being the overhasty type of guy is a dangerous combination Wink

Fuserleer

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1016

Quote from: ExtremeFacials.com on September 01, 2015, 11:32:11 PM

Quote from: LiQio on September 01, 2015, 11:22:50 PM

Quote from: Fuserleer on September 01, 2015, 04:35:21 PM

[...]

At go live, the buffer will be credited with 10% of the total amount of currency the system is started with, so if there is 1M EMU at launch, the buffer will be credited with 100,000. This should be enough to cover almost all short term pump/dump movements. The buffer also receives 10% of all new currency being issued, (and in the cases where the buffer is low, system revenue from fees) so as to ensure its purchasing power -> currency ratio is always adequate to guard against "un-natural" movements.

If the case of a supply contraction, buffer assets are burned. If enough can not be burned from the buffer, then EMU is purchased from the DEX, held for a short period in "limbo" and burnt later if the system doesn't return to an expansive state.

That is a VERY simplified explanation of whats going on, there is plenty of further detail required on the algorithms and mechanisms at play to get a fuller understanding, but the above should be enough to at least have an idea.

[...]

Really curious about those "details".
For now I would call it playing with fire.

caveman who played with fire eventually discovered BBQ ribs ... YUMMY!! Much better than raw mammoth steaks, just ask Bear Gryls, that dude drinks his own piss ... I'm sure Bear is just as excited at the prospect of chowing down on some flame grilled EMU as many here on this forum. I respect Fuserleer for playing with fire!!

Hah! You sir, win comment of the day!

ExtremeFacials.com

member

Activity: 190

Merit: 10

Quote from: LiQio on September 01, 2015, 11:22:50 PM

Quote from: Fuserleer on September 01, 2015, 04:35:21 PM

[...]

At go live, the buffer will be credited with 10% of the total amount of currency the system is started with, so if there is 1M EMU at launch, the buffer will be credited with 100,000. This should be enough to cover almost all short term pump/dump movements. The buffer also receives 10% of all new currency being issued, (and in the cases where the buffer is low, system revenue from fees) so as to ensure its purchasing power -> currency ratio is always adequate to guard against "un-natural" movements.

If the case of a supply contraction, buffer assets are burned. If enough can not be burned from the buffer, then EMU is purchased from the DEX, held for a short period in "limbo" and burnt later if the system doesn't return to an expansive state.

That is a VERY simplified explanation of whats going on, there is plenty of further detail required on the algorithms and mechanisms at play to get a fuller understanding, but the above should be enough to at least have an idea.

[...]

Really curious about those "details".
For now I would call it playing with fire.

caveman who played with fire eventually discovered BBQ ribs ... YUMMY!! Much better than raw mammoth steaks, just ask Bear Gryls, that dude drinks his own piss ... I'm sure Bear is just as excited at the prospect of chowing down on some flame grilled EMU as many here on this forum. I respect Fuserleer for playing with fire!!

LiQio

legendary

Activity: 1181

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Fuserleer on September 01, 2015, 04:35:21 PM

[...]

At go live, the buffer will be credited with 10% of the total amount of currency the system is started with, so if there is 1M EMU at launch, the buffer will be credited with 100,000. This should be enough to cover almost all short term pump/dump movements. The buffer also receives 10% of all new currency being issued, (and in the cases where the buffer is low, system revenue from fees) so as to ensure its purchasing power -> currency ratio is always adequate to guard against "un-natural" movements.

If the case of a supply contraction, buffer assets are burned. If enough can not be burned from the buffer, then EMU is purchased from the DEX, held for a short period in "limbo" and burnt later if the system doesn't return to an expansive state.

That is a VERY simplified explanation of whats going on, there is plenty of further detail required on the algorithms and mechanisms at play to get a fuller understanding, but the above should be enough to at least have an idea.

[...]

Really curious about those "details".
For now I would call it playing with fire.

Peachy

full member

Activity: 179

Merit: 100

Count me in as another proud investor without issue for over 2 years and I'm willing to wait as long as it takes.

With regard to the development timeline, just remember we've had 6000 years of human-controlled/manipulated currency and all of it's inherent problems. I think taking a few years to build an autonomously decentralized version is more than justified.

As for the baseless criminal accusations. Oh puhLEEZ. I've flown from Texas to the UK to meet with him personally and can 100% vouch for his credibility and acumen.

Fuserleer

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1016

Quote from: JBC on September 01, 2015, 07:17:36 PM

Quote from: americanpegasus on September 01, 2015, 01:41:15 AM

I don't know who you are, but you are lighting up the board with your hype.

Please link me to am ANN topic or show me some technicals. What algo are you using? What's the distribution? What do you bring technology wise that is unique? How many transactions per second and can it scale? Etc etc.

Hype is cheap. Show me something real.

AFAIK Fuserleer was doxxed on Bitcointalk. Turns out this Fuserleer guy was lying on his linkedin and had a history of criminal activity in the United Kingdom. Anyone who is taking this guy seriously is naive and probably took Josh Garza (PayCoin / PayScam) seriously too.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3390794

Fuserleer was also talking down about NXT - his loss, he could had made millions. Cheesy

I think Fuserleer is running a vaporware scam and not to be sued or thrown into prison, he pretends he is still working on eMunie. eMunie was originally meant to release in 2013. So there's been investors who gave their money to him and still haven't seen anything more than 2 years later.

Anyone who invested into Fuserleer can pretty much consider their money gone. If eMunie does eventually release, I imagine the coin would sit at between position 50-100 and Fuserleer's reputation or the coins' inflationary mechanism will probably kill it.

A conspiracy website would probably be a better fit for you than BitcoinTalk. Or at least someone should kick the turntable, the record is truly stuck.

I was never doxxed, I put my own documents online here, including my passport. If not too much trouble, could you also provide some light regarding my proven criminal past? I wasn't aware I was a fugitive!

Please feel free to contact anyone from my LinkedIn account seeing as you have access and ask about me. There are a number of high profile people at VP+ level which I am connected to within the telecoms industry, and have worked side by side with many of them in previous companies I have owned in that industry.

I can also give you a list of games I worked on that have my name in the credits, and provide the contact details of people within the games industry you may also contact and cross check with them.

As I and others have said over and over, yet for some reason doesn't sink in, investors that wanted their money back got it, the ones that didn't are happy with the progress. Please direct us to the evidence that supports your claims, surely there should be many complaints of people up in arms all over the internet.

Thanks

JBC

member

Activity: 66

Merit: 10

Quote from: americanpegasus on September 01, 2015, 01:41:15 AM

I don't know who you are, but you are lighting up the board with your hype.

Please link me to am ANN topic or show me some technicals. What algo are you using? What's the distribution? What do you bring technology wise that is unique? How many transactions per second and can it scale? Etc etc.

Hype is cheap. Show me something real.

AFAIK Fuserleer was doxxed on Bitcointalk. Turns out this Fuserleer guy was lying on his linkedin and had a history of criminal activity in the United Kingdom. Anyone who is taking this guy seriously is naive and probably took Josh Garza (PayCoin / PayScam) seriously too.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3390794

Fuserleer was also talking down about NXT - his loss, he could had made millions. Cheesy

I think Fuserleer is running a vaporware scam and not to be sued or thrown into prison, he pretends he is still working on eMunie. eMunie was originally meant to release in 2013. So there's been investors who gave their money to him and still haven't seen anything more than 2 years later.

Anyone who invested into Fuserleer can pretty much consider their money gone. If eMunie does eventually release, I imagine the coin would sit at between position 50-100 and Fuserleer's reputation or the coins' inflationary mechanism will probably kill it.

theprofileth

full member

Activity: 239

Merit: 100

Socialist Cryptocurrency Devote

Quote from: 50cent_rapper on September 01, 2015, 05:28:20 PM

How to get some emunie Huh

Wait for when we publicly launch

50cent_rapper

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1000

How to get some emunie Huh

Fuserleer

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1016

Quote from: theprofileth on September 01, 2015, 04:56:11 PM

Fuserleer I really like that the buffer will grow with the currency to help make sure that the currency will almost never be at risk of massive price swings

It can't mitigate them entirely.

In the event of a large run/rally, it will only be able to settle 10% or so....after that the price is in freefall/moon mode. This is fair enough though, as it is not meant to stifle real free market activity, and if the free market wants a dump/pump, then so be it.

Other edge cases could be that a few whales together try and dump/pump the price, and while not successful, the buffer ends up on the lean side. Should another pump/dump of sufficient volume follow shortly after before new funds can make their way to the buffer, you'll get some volatility.

10% or so should be more than enough to cover a succession of these events and provide at least a smoother ride than cryptos atm.

Of course, as the user base grows, and as our target user base is mass market, you'll see the price stabilize itself as the ratio of manipulators:genuine users contrasts. The majority of the currency will not be in the hands of manipulators due to the distribution models, so the buffer should be less and less required.

Topic: [EMUNIE] One small step for transactions, one giant leap for crypto - page 3. (Read 5626 times)