Topic: [ENDED] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ - page 123. (Read 303553 times)
Payments sent for this week (8163a0c5cccead2e6bad8d0163db0f6cce162c21ba98367a978f28a8e8e91de5)
snip
I can understand that sometimes members don't read the OP before applying or don't understand the rules correctly but seem like Layer1gfx doesn't even bother to read anything in this thread.
I see ongoing discussion about bad applications a few posts above and to see this application just after is kind of hilarious.
Username: layer1gfx
Post Count: 2505
BTC Address (must be SegWit): bc1q7rgwgyx60uk4h3a6sq9cp65aakj20qprzjq8qd
Post Count: 2505
BTC Address (must be SegWit): bc1q7rgwgyx60uk4h3a6sq9cp65aakj20qprzjq8qd
Payments sent for this week. (f6c67f5cda55a711c344b17abb42355b9d879475acd157f62028be2e89b17533)
I think the solution to this will be to start tagging people who apply to campaigns when it's either full/closed or they don't meet the requirements. If this is done people will be more careful reading before applying. It's really appalling.
That's a pretty strict solution... and one that wouldn't make sense, especially considering the new changes to trust in regards to Guest perspectives.Annoying? Sure. But it's not worth diluting the value of negative feedback to resolve it. Besides, all you'll have is a slew of extra threads in Reputation reprimanding rigid regulations.
Agree here, I am not the most stupid ape on the planet, I guess, but was a little overasked with "how it works here" and probably did not spend more than 5 minutes with reading/understanding when I applied for an BTC-Campaign for the first time, so I basically did the same (applying with no availability).
Also in times of Google the mentality shifted to "ask your question quick and come back later to find your answer" over "take your time and find out the answer(s) to your questions.
Annoying indeed, but seriously, lets just skip it and don´t make a big mess out of it, mostly making a mess is ego-driven only anyway
Don’t be so hard on him mate. lol
he must have read “2-5 OPEN SPOTS”
a misunderstanding indeed.
he must have read “2-5 OPEN SPOTS”
a misunderstanding indeed.
Only because he quoted his old post and therefore changed the title back.
misunderstood something
You need to read first before trying to understand. Maybe look at the title of the thread that states "FULL" and the conversation over the last pages about people who keep applying while there is no open spot.
I guess nobody can blame you for trying once, but if you even start bumping your application which doesn't even have a segwit address as requested...
Don’t be so hard on him mate. lol
he must have read “2-5 OPEN SPOTS”
a misunderstanding indeed.
misunderstood something
You need to read first before trying to understand. Maybe look at the title of the thread that states "FULL" and the conversation over the last pages about people who keep applying while there is no open spot.
I guess nobody can blame you for trying once, but if you even start bumping your application which doesn't even have a segwit address as requested...
Thats true guys, and sorry again for my misunderstanding
misunderstood something
You need to read first before trying to understand. Maybe look at the title of the thread that states "FULL" and the conversation over the last pages about people who keep applying while there is no open spot.
I guess nobody can blame you for trying once, but if you even start bumping your application which doesn't even have a segwit address as requested...
Don’t be so hard on him mate. lol
he must have read “2-5 OPEN SPOTS”
a misunderstanding indeed.
misunderstood something
You need to read first before trying to understand. Maybe look at the title of the thread that states "FULL" and the conversation over the last pages about people who keep applying while there is no open spot.
I guess nobody can blame you for trying once, but if you even start bumping your application which doesn't even have a segwit address as requested...
I think the solution to this will be to start tagging people who apply to campaigns when it's either full/closed or they don't meet the requirements. If this is done people will be more careful reading before applying. It's really appalling.
That's a pretty strict solution... and one that wouldn't make sense, especially considering the new changes to trust in regards to Guest perspectives.Annoying? Sure. But it's not worth diluting the value of negative feedback to resolve it. Besides, all you'll have is a slew of extra threads in Reputation reprimanding rigid regulations.
I think the solution to this will be to start tagging people who apply to campaigns when it's either full/closed or they don't meet the requirements. If this is done people will be more careful reading before applying. It's really appalling.
Sometimes it ends well for others. Im pretty sure they can read, they're just trying their luck here. You don't need to tell them when do they do it.
That doesn't make someone a 'scammer'.
Damn right lol.
Even reading the post above where hilarious quotes the op with the "trusted members are better off PMing" ...
I did PM Darkstar 2 days ago, few hours ago he answered me telling me to write in the thread, so I don’t understand your complaint.This is what I said: (emphasis mine)
Hi, if you want to apply, please make an application post on the thread once there is an open spot. Thanks.
That doesn't make someone a 'scammer'.
Even reading the post above where hilarious quotes the op with the "trusted members are better off PMing" ...
I did PM Darkstar 2 days ago, few hours ago he answered me telling me to write in the thread, so I don’t understand your complaint.This is what I said: (emphasis mine)
Hi, if you want to apply, please make an application post on the thread once there is an open spot. Thanks.
Payments sent for this week. (6d9e57e0e2af83045011ac3bed56e922a1a11dc5decce3c2d95a27578b3db67a)
Do you truly lack that much self awareness?
It's more like lack of forum awareness.
last post:
Code:
on: September 04, 2016, 07:36:53 PM
seems like he just bought the account, apparently he was scammed since this account is pretty worthless anyway.
Yes. Seems so. And promoting yoshit as well.
Even reading the post above where hilarious quotes the op with the "trusted members are better off PMing" ...
I did PM Darkstar 2 days ago, few hours ago he answered me telling me to write in the thread, so I don’t understand your complaint.This is what I said: (emphasis mine)
Hi, if you want to apply, please make an application post on the thread once there is an open spot. Thanks.
Do you truly lack that much self awareness?
It's more like lack of forum awareness.
last post:
Code:
on: September 04, 2016, 07:36:53 PM
seems like he just bought the account, apparently he was scammed since this account is pretty worthless anyway.
Still a Place open?
Zero merit. A metric shit ton of red trust hate.
Do you truly lack that much self awareness?
Hi,
Im interested!
User name: lama-hunter
Post count : 739
BTC Address : 12854DSCRTpxTGXXJiZsVMZY9W9eNAtqYk
Still a Place open?
kindly regards
Im interested!
User name: lama-hunter
Post count : 739
BTC Address : 12854DSCRTpxTGXXJiZsVMZY9W9eNAtqYk
Still a Place open?
kindly regards
Even reading the post above where hilarious quotes the op with the "trusted members are better off PMing" ...
I did PM Darkstar 2 days ago, few hours ago he answered me telling me to write in the thread, so I don’t understand your complaint.This is what I said: (emphasis mine)
Hi, if you want to apply, please make an application post on the thread once there is an open spot. Thanks.
Jump to: