Topic: Enpugh is enough time Truth about btc - page 2. (Read 666 times)

Haha, that will boost his attention and cognitive abilities... Maybe that's causing overthinking from it and as a result we got that... Or that maybe will get him lit till he is gone away.

Btw that's really possible, everything is possible until we know exact answer. But there are some reasons why I exclude this opinion:
1. Money is laundered via banks without problems, it's more likely done by elite people and serious businessmen. And this is done through Deutche Bank and other major banks... So bitcoin isn't their segment, more likely bitcoin is for average people or a little bit higher ones.
2. If this was done by banks, I still believe that this couldn't be keep as a secret and there would be some infos leaked...
3. If this was done by banks, then governments would know a lot about bitcoin and blockchain technologies from the very beginning. If you see, in past it was easiest to scam but was very hard for governments to track users. Otherwise, I believe a lot of people would be caught because of charging a lot of bitcoins, it would be beneficial for governments.

But at the same time yeah, it could be done by banks or by governments and they may act like it's nothing from their sides as it should be. It's perfect act when you act like 0% of real yourself, when you act with 0% doubt.

Your statement will tend to confuse newbies when they first read this without deep research about bitcoin. But, as for me, I do believe its Satoshi Nakamoto who created bitcoin with his brilliant mind and sense its already popular and widely used now, a lot of pretentious individuals were claiming that they were Satoshi and so many statement about how bitcoin was made just to go with the trend. And if we try to look on the other side of the story, its really rediculous and so impossibe that banks will produce this kind of digital currency.
The other one above is right, bitcoin is ours now and it doesnt matter who created it, yet we are truly grateful to Satoshi for we are savoring now the fruit of all his labor several years ago.

You have been claiming that for a year already, and yet you failed to provide supporting statements that will clarify your idea which you see in this post. As the creator of bitcoin has remained anonymous, until now, there has been a different speculative. So, why don't you present your analysis, the documents, and articles that discuss bitcoin is created by banks? In doing so, people can validate your statements and perceive your point.

An appropriately title but the content may contain something half curiosity if does it have any concrete evidence to prove that the bank created bitcoin and not Satoshi and half funny instead. Something funny to think if ever the bank created it coz as we all know bitcoin or cryptocurrency was decentralised and volatile, non of the banks have a control on it. So why do insist this certain topics without proof attached??

As long as it's open source, audited, and no one could tamper with it, we do not care anymore whether who Satoshi really is. What is important is that we are now benefiting from lots of its services which allows us to do things we cannot do before such as transacting anonymously and faster than ever.

I just wonder what comes out from your mind to think that Banks created Bitcoin when in fact, Bitcoin's whitepaper already eliminated the purpose of third party intermediaries and one big example is banks.

there is no proof you can give, it sounds like nonsense, so what's the benefit if it was founded by the BANK, bitcoin belongs to all of us here, everything is watching and transactions look widely open, even when viewed from the BANK and BTC systems it's clear very different

Not like there's anything that could change even if we knew about the "truth" of BTC. Even if it was the average joe in your work that made it, or the nerd/geek gang of your hs alumni, or just banks messing with the financial word and made this, nothing would change, BTC is there, it basically runs through the community now. Look at how CSW tried to capitalize on the name of Satoshi, and look at where that went, a lawsuit. Not really sure about what happened about said lawsuit though.

your title is verry serious but the content is half funny . can you show that " more evidence " your saying while you dont need to show evidence that btc is built by satoshi because we already know that ,

theres alot of evidence left on the internet that satoshi did built btc althought he didnt create the whole cryptocurrency ecosystem but there are other people thats behind for that  . there are crypto that are created by banks or related to banks and one of it is ripple  .

he can't. because if he has he would have already posted it. he's only evidence is gut feelings and nothing more. sometimes I feel like having a "bitcoin conspiracy theory board" would be nice so people with thoughts like OP would leave bitcoin discussion and other boards alone.

I was surprised to read his post OP should have posted it on the Joke thread if its available here why will someone just wake up and say cryptocurrencies was created by  banks? despite all the glaring evidences of whitepapers, articles e.t.c about bitcoin, he should be aware that the implication of adopting cryptos by many investors will leads to many banks closure, a lot of people will utilize cryptos as a store of value to detriment of the banks, the OP need more education and enlightenment so as to be kept abreast of creation ofbitcpon

At first: STOP LISTENING TO THE LEGENDS !!  They are here for a reason....

And YES, Satoshi doesn't exist and was a Magic Pink Unicorn created for this purpose!

Bitcoin is created by IBM after stealing the Blockchain from creator David Chaum.
A couple of years later C. Dwork from IBM created the consensus POW mechanism and this was put in place
as the POW consensus protocol instead of the way the early consensus worked.
The reason they did this, is because THIS is the part where they have full control over the chain.

The first milion+ Bitcoin, referred as the Satoshi Bitcoins are mined in The Netherlands.
Supercomputer center S.A.R.A  back then, now called SurfSARA.
Back in 2009 SARA owned the Huygens Supercomputer with serious IBM power
( IBM System p-575 , 3328 x POWER6 @ 4,7 GHz + IBM System p5-575 , 1920 × POWER5+ @ 1,9 GHz )

It is not only IBM mastering this project, if you search you will find (much) more BIG companies involved.
Such as a company in Cupertino  

I said it before: LOTS of people where fooled what Bitcoin was. And now you also understand why Lightning was added...
POW means control of the network by computer power en LN was added to get control of the (future) transactions.

They created the Satoshi DOGMA to blind the people and stop you from searching in the right way.
Your feeling was right and don't get fooled by the Legends, they just do -their work- and CAN NOT be trusted!

We should thank the OP for this thread, it really shows that there are a lot of conspiracy theory behind, bankers, even Pablo Escobar’s Descendants Claim to Have Known Satoshi Nakamoto.

However, for bitcoin enthusiast, it was Satoshi who started bitcoin and even though we have so many conspiracies out there, it won't change a thing.

OK.

Then give a reliable source for your claim. It's not more of an opinion but you are thinking of stating a fact that no one will believe you. Do you think that it now makes sense with those conspiracy theories that you have?

Just leave satoshi alone and be grateful that we have BTC.

 

Keep your delusional conspiracy theorem to yourself, Bitcoin is greater than what you are trying to attribute to the Central Banks. The government can't sponsor such a great innovation.
Well, We are more or less concerned with who those Yale university students are/were. It is now solving pressing issues faced by humans daily so, we don't actually care.

I think you have a problem with your head right now? Are you still alright mate?
Do you have any kind of references so most of us will know what you are talking about?
Even the google agree that Satoshi Nakamoto is the creator of the bitcoin if you can change the answer on any search engine that bitcoin is created by banks without using the f12/inspect element there is chance that I believe you.



This kind of thread will just up another issues with satoshi nakamoto and becomes a reason why people getting more curious. Is this only a strategy of OP to spread a news to become more active the bitcoin? hmm. I don't think so.

Yes, it might be that the team actually included bankers. However, it doesn't mean they weren't Satoshi because we don't know who Satoshi is. And, to be honest, even though it can be argued that Bitcoin could be created by banks, I don't think this is truly the case. After all, it appeared as an alternative, and it appeared when banks failed spectacularly, causing the global economic crisis by their games and getting bailouts anyway. And a part of Bitcoin is ours if we own and use it. I don't believe Bitcoin is controlled by any corporation or a conglomerate of them. I think it might be occasionally manipulated (the price), but without a long-term effect. Bitcoin is ours.

It's not seems it was created by the bank or jp Morgan.Your theory was not acceptable one by the forum people.Do you have any valid proof for that theory.Because only valid and proved theory was accepted by people.When the person said world was circle,no one accepted.It was later accepted by the valid proof.Who invented is doesn't a matter of now.It's our asset for now.

I think it's quite possible.

However if OP can't figure out that that really doesn't matter then they need to up their Adderrall infusion. Its fate is in the hands of the people who populate its system. They're the ones who decide its course and its future and there's no possible way of pulling the wool over their eyes.

This would be one of the biggest joke around here in the forum maybe you forgot to mention that it was just a total joke at the ending of your post?
If you would really want to push this theory at least give out a solid evidence on your claims.

Well it seems logical that Bitcoin was created by a team of people, and that they used a pseudonym or a figure head to launch the project. Banking is really controlled by the wealthy dynasties, and they needed to experiment with various alternatives to replace the dying fiat currencies. Bitcoin would appear to be one of the more successful of these. The 21 million cap, and the average 10 minute block generation time mean that it can never become a general currency for everyday transactions. The 21 million cap also means that the bankers can control Bitcoin by purchasing large numbers of coins, and this has the added benefit of further increasing their wealth.

Bitcoin is no longer "ours", but we can use it to our advantage, provided that we work with the financial institutions and governments that are now using it as a store of wealth. We need to use the changes to our advantage, and not try to fight the massive sums of money that are flooding into the Bitcoin economy.