I've looked everywhere to buy one of these bad boys. Any links peeps?
I am producing a small batch of 100. Should be ready in two weeks. 
Topic: Enterpoint Bitfury USB Stick (Read 7637 times)
I've looked everywhere to buy one of these bad boys. Any links peeps?
I am producing a small batch of 100. Should be ready in two weeksTM. I see what you did there
I've looked everywhere to buy one of these bad boys. Any links peeps?
I am producing a small batch of 100. Should be ready in two weeksTM. I see what you did there
I've looked everywhere to buy one of these bad boys. Any links peeps?
I am producing a small batch of 100. Should be ready in two weeks. 
I've looked everywhere to buy one of these bad boys. Any links peeps?
SO yohan where are the updates saying you would give details mid October. October is coming to an end and am sure many want updates as to what is going on.
thats like intel advertising a 3.6Ghz CPU (which everyone knows can be overclocked up higher) but in reality its only manages 1.83Ghz CPU once you put it into a motherboard. and intel replying, thats what customers should expect...
maybe u dont know that but cpu use different clocks. You are probably talking about low power clock when its in idle mode so it can be 1.83Ghz or something. If intel advertising 3.6Ghz cpu its really working at 3.6Ghz.. or now with turbo even more
Even Intel gets it wrong, their first batch of Pentiums couldn't even divide floating-points properly. They still shoved them out the door to the market!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug
thats like intel advertising a 3.6Ghz CPU (which everyone knows can be overclocked up higher) but in reality its only manages 1.83Ghz CPU once you put it into a motherboard. and intel replying, thats what customers should expect...
maybe u dont know that but cpu use different clocks. You are probably talking about low power clock when its in idle mode so it can be 1.83Ghz or something. If intel advertising 3.6Ghz cpu its really working at 3.6Ghz.. or now with turbo even more
It was an example, not meant to be technically or literally correct.
agreed it was meant as an example.. basically.. the advertising on the box doesnt correspond to actual use..
but anyway, i love that yohan and his company are pretty much the first 'industry' into bitcoin that from wages (yohan himself taking bitcoin), the factory, the shipping, are all able to be done within bitcoins.(because its all done at enterpoint). i do find enterpoint/yohan a great addition to the community. just knit picking the chip supplier (bitfury) for not making new batches of chips with a more accurate speed etched into the chip.
that being said.. going back to the pricepoint...
i can get a avalon 60Ghash for 6btc so thats 0.25btc per 2.5Ghash, so these new bitfury usb sticks better be competitve
Glad to see there is something for the lil guy but at the same time i have a feeling these are NOT going to be competitively priced.
Hope im wrong.
Hope im wrong.
Are these going to be a classic hurry up and wait buy? I got stuck with a 20.4 btc buy on blue fury sticks. Seller gave an agreed refund to me (17 BTC since btc went up I did not lose usd on the deal.), but that group buy is dead in the water. These super sticks have many Aiscminer stick owners crying for them. I could sell 500 on ebay . I sold about 600 AM sticks on ebay. So if these are sold in hand I would buy some. If they are preorder I am not interested. The only reason AM sticks sold well was they were in hand.
thats like intel advertising a 3.6Ghz CPU (which everyone knows can be overclocked up higher) but in reality its only manages 1.83Ghz CPU once you put it into a motherboard. and intel replying, thats what customers should expect...
maybe u dont know that but cpu use different clocks. You are probably talking about low power clock when its in idle mode so it can be 1.83Ghz or something. If intel advertising 3.6Ghz cpu its really working at 3.6Ghz.. or now with turbo even more
It was an example, not meant to be technically or literally correct.
thats like intel advertising a 3.6Ghz CPU (which everyone knows can be overclocked up higher) but in reality its only manages 1.83Ghz CPU once you put it into a motherboard. and intel replying, thats what customers should expect...
maybe u dont know that but cpu use different clocks. You are probably talking about low power clock when its in idle mode so it can be 1.83Ghz or something. If intel advertising 3.6Ghz cpu its really working at 3.6Ghz.. or now with turbo even more
Interested.
reading the writing on the chips it says 5Ghash....
That's the max theoretical speed of the chip.
See here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-bitfury-is-looking-for-alpha-testers-of-first-chips-free-money-here-228677
spiccioli
It is actually a bit different:
Performance: 3.3 GH/s _rated performance_, about 7 GH/s maximum
Power consumption: 1 W at _rated_ performance @ 0.6 V, 6 W _maximum_ performance @ 1.0 V.
Power consumption: 1 W at _rated_ performance @ 0.6 V, 6 W _maximum_ performance @ 1.0 V.
Also, majority of the reports are for the chips doing 2.5-2.7GH/s. This however is largely dependent on the power supply. What I've learned is that chips are extremely picky about it and the more stable (less ripples) voltage the more the hashes.
There were posts of people using supercaps (like 4.7F) to power the chip and managed to squeeze out 3.3-3.4GH/s which sort of matches Bitfury's initial designs.
Also, at some point he mentioned that there was a bug in the crystal and because of that the 7GH/s wasn't possible.
Anyways - you guys got an interesting idea and I wish you best of luck with that design! Let me know if you have any questions about the chip - I learned a lot about it while doing the NanoFury design
seems everyone is waiting on chips to be shipped.
So its Mid Oct do we have an updated timeline?
the theatrical 'pause' before revealing results if getting a bit long
yohan logged on an hour ago from the timestamp of this message, but did not post anything. his last post being 10 days ago.... this is turning into a cliffhanger....
the suspense is building...
So its Mid Oct do we have an updated timeline?
thats like intel advertising a 3.6Ghz CPU (which everyone knows can be overclocked up higher) but in reality its only manages 1.83Ghz CPU once you put it into a motherboard. and intel replying, thats what customers should expect...
and now i tooo have bit..fury.
by that i mean, darn these bitcoin industry manufacturers... they say one thing, and mean another lol..
no offence to enterpoint as i know its not their chips...
.. still atleast these sticks are gonna be alot better then 333mhash
and now i tooo have bit..fury.
by that i mean, darn these bitcoin industry manufacturers... they say one thing, and mean another lol..
no offence to enterpoint as i know its not their chips...
.. still atleast these sticks are gonna be alot better then 333mhash
To be fair to him I don't think bitfury has ever advertised these as 5GH/s chips. It just happens to be written on the package, which presumably came before the testing phase that discovered their actual performance. It is a bit misleading, I admit, but I think **most** manufacturers are being honest about what they will actually achieve.
5GH/s was the idealogical speed of the chips when they went to fab, but in the real-world, the speed can not reach that. This was discovered and made clear as quickly as one would reasonably expect. The fact is thatr the chips are capable of:
no heatsinks, air cooling: 1.5-2GH/s
small heatsinks and air cooling 2.2-2.7GH/s
large cooling apparatus: ~3.4GH/s on a single chip test board.
its feasible that 4GH/s might be achieved by water cooling or other similar extreme cooling methods, but it has not been pushed that far. power efficiency at that speed would likely approach/pass 2w/GH
thats like intel advertising a 3.6Ghz CPU (which everyone knows can be overclocked up higher) but in reality its only manages 1.83Ghz CPU once you put it into a motherboard. and intel replying, thats what customers should expect...
and now i tooo have bit..fury.
by that i mean, darn these bitcoin industry manufacturers... they say one thing, and mean another lol..
no offence to enterpoint as i know its not their chips...
.. still atleast these sticks are gonna be alot better then 333mhash
and now i tooo have bit..fury.
by that i mean, darn these bitcoin industry manufacturers... they say one thing, and mean another lol..
no offence to enterpoint as i know its not their chips...
.. still atleast these sticks are gonna be alot better then 333mhash
To be fair to him I don't think bitfury has ever advertised these as 5GH/s chips. It just happens to be written on the package, which presumably came before the testing phase that discovered their actual performance. It is a bit misleading, I admit, but I think **most** manufacturers are being honest about what they will actually achieve.
thats like intel advertising a 3.6Ghz CPU (which everyone knows can be overclocked up higher) but in reality its only manages 1.83Ghz CPU once you put it into a motherboard. and intel replying, thats what customers should expect...
and now i tooo have bit..fury.
by that i mean, darn these bitcoin industry manufacturers... they say one thing, and mean another lol..
no offence to enterpoint as i know its not their chips...
.. still atleast these sticks are gonna be alot better then 333mhash
and now i tooo have bit..fury.
by that i mean, darn these bitcoin industry manufacturers... they say one thing, and mean another lol..
no offence to enterpoint as i know its not their chips...
.. still atleast these sticks are gonna be alot better then 333mhash
Jump to: