The bounty sheet as it stands is not final, so we can all relax a bit.
Toward the end of the ICO, we realized that there was quite a bit of abuse of the bounty program—poor quality posts, automated translations, and accounts that are plainly bots were credited on the bounty rolls. In some cases, these bad actors were scoring better than participants who spread the word with great quality content and access to audiences of real people who ended up investing—providing real value to envion and the ICO.
Obviously, rewarding bad actors instead of the most helpful people is not good for envion, but more importantly, this is unfair to all of you who spent time helping us reach our goal.
Envion has asked the bounty managers to make a thorough review of all the bounty rolls to remove abusers and to identify the participants who contributed the most. This process is ongoing and envion will have the final say in the bounty distribution.
The bounty team is still in the process of their review. After that, the envion team will do another assessment. The results of our assessment will be final and will result in fairer rewards for our contributors.
We ask that you be patient as we proceed with the review and know that we will take your input here into consideration.
Cheers,
envion Support Team
This is very good news, it clears a situation which was becoming very obscure. Of course, learning that there have been people spamming the forum in automated ways or with very poor posts opens to the necessity of analyzing well the activity of all bounty hunters. But to avoid this burst of flaming you should have better made this clear statement immediately, and, more than that, your bounty manager should have NOT declared that all stakes on spreadsheet are final. Now that it's clear what's going on, all the best with the scrutinizing of the campaign and, of course, good luck with your excellent project.