This time, it is told by a pathologist.
yeah, but a pathologist with a bizarre record for making controversial claims in many many cases linked to questionable deaths of establishment figures. How strange that they wheel this guy out to be present at the autopsy, when there must be thousands of other pathologists perfectly capable of doing it. We need someone we can trust, right?
most of you sound crazy in this thread
this is a real case, involving real people, not some stupid fantasy TV show plot. If you really thought this was important, you'd quit the dumb mindless unsubstantiated claims, but because so many of you are making claims that have no evidence, you make the whole situation all look cerrrrrazzzyyyyy
and doing that helps Epstein, and his co-accused, many of whom are still alive. you may as well be working for those people, really, I'm sure they're really happy with the way you're presenting this story