Topic: Escrow is a must to avoid disappointment - page 5. (Read 1036 times)
Escrow is a good way to ensure bounty hunters receive reward but it also depend on the project. Take DogData for example had their bounty campaign and did escrow with a bounty management but changed their smart contract few days before IEO making the tokens useless for hunters and when they finally send tradable tokens months later, the whole campaign token is worth $20. If a project team has no remorse or even conscience to appreciate hunters and pay for the effort they took to promote their project. It all depends on the project, if a project is good and honest, even without escrow they will still pay hunters for example Cartesi.
It's becoming more harder for new projects team to keep their promises to bounty hunters, some even said bounty hunters are getting free tokens for free, meaning bounty hunters aren't recognized for their work, I suggest all bounty managers to start using ESCROW.
I believe with escrow payment will be guaranteed, team won't be able to go back on their words, bitwings for example, after a complete year of waiting for payment they decide to do another audit on spreadsheet and they falsely accused bounty hunters without any proof.
Bounty Detective is the only bounty manager using escrow, if many bounty managers start using escrow it will be better.
I believe with escrow payment will be guaranteed, team won't be able to go back on their words, bitwings for example, after a complete year of waiting for payment they decide to do another audit on spreadsheet and they falsely accused bounty hunters without any proof.
Bounty Detective is the only bounty manager using escrow, if many bounty managers start using escrow it will be better.
i Really disappoint to bitwing i think this is worst project and they don’t want to paying bounty hunter, i am active every time but they delete me for inactivity, now i agree that every project need to escrow, Bounty Detective already launch escrow bounty this is appreciated.
In my priority, if there is two projects, one have the escrow and one doesn't have it then, of course, I would go for the one have it in a heartbeat. I wish escrow would be a mandatory for every bounty campaign in bitcointalk.
I am not concerned about escrow, what makes me interested is the quality of that project. If they were to make an IEO at a major exchange in this market then I believe they would not need a deposit, and we would definitely get their money from them. In my priority, if there is two projects, one have the escrow and one doesn't have it then, of course, I would go for the one have it in a heartbeat. I wish escrow would be a mandatory for every bounty campaign in bitcointalk.
escrow just helps you get your coins. I have hundreds of companies that paid me my tokens, but these companies have become a scam and my tokens is equal to 0$. they didn't even trade on exchangesI have about the same statistics, but still there are a couple of projects that did not pay anything, and now they are trading on the exchange and feel good.
In my priority, if there is two projects, one have the escrow and one doesn't have it then, of course, I would go for the one have it in a heartbeat. I wish escrow would be a mandatory for every bounty campaign in bitcointalk.
But it cost money to hire an escrow to hold funds, i don't know how much though but it differs per escrow, that's just additional fee for the developers on top of the payment for hunters. 
Bounties that have escrow have payment guarantees by bounty managers, but bounties now rarely use escrow services because they have the intention to reduce allocations or won't even distribute tokens.
It caused by the manager didn't wanna try to discuss about that but some managers have already started to do this to make its participants to get what they have deserved before. The scam projects will always try to think how to fool the hunters.
Not necessarily. Any project can have the intention to be bad even with escrow and I experienced this myself personally in crypto,,, whereas I have also been in completely honest projects with no escrow and they pay and keep their words as they always have. So let us not jump to conclusions I agree escrow is good but it is not a 100% marker of anything.
In my priority, if there is two projects, one have the escrow and one doesn't have it then, of course, I would go for the one have it in a heartbeat. I wish escrow would be a mandatory for every bounty campaign in bitcointalk.
escrow just helps you get your coins. I have hundreds of companies that paid me my tokens, but these companies have become a scam and my tokens is equal to 0$. they didn't even trade on exchangesIn my priority, if there is two projects, one have the escrow and one doesn't have it then, of course, I would go for the one have it in a heartbeat. I wish escrow would be a mandatory for every bounty campaign in bitcointalk.
Yes, the project choice is always open to be chosen by each bounty participant, but all participants will obviously choose what they believe in and he likes according to the considerations he has researched first, such as his escrow and others as well.
In my priority, if there is two projects, one have the escrow and one doesn't have it then, of course, I would go for the one have it in a heartbeat. I wish escrow would be a mandatory for every bounty campaign in bitcointalk.
Yes, the project choice is always open to be chosen by each bounty participant, but all participants will obviously choose what they believe in and he likes according to the considerations he has researched first, such as his escrow and others as well. the bad news is that the bounty detective is promoting the kingcasino scam project, even though they guarantee tokens from the project but see now they are helping the scamer.we do not know how much the total loss experienced by investors.
I hope they will be more selective in choosing projects to promote.
I hope they will be more selective in choosing projects to promote.
It's inevitable and there's nothing we can do about it when team itself planned to exit scam in the end because of greed. I think BMs did their part to verify the legitimacy as much as they could and even agreed on escrow payment as i know of but KingCasino team did horrible that everyone not expected it. Sadly, it's total loss to investors and hunters who joined promoting it for 12 week wherein time and efforts got wasted.
In my priority, if there is two projects, one have the escrow and one doesn't have it then, of course, I would go for the one have it in a heartbeat. I wish escrow would be a mandatory for every bounty campaign in bitcointalk.
I guess not many projects are visible at the moment. some of it ends up being a scam, but I guess not as much as before. besides, bounty hunter, I think now most won't be easy to join the campaign carelessly. past experiences have given everyone learning.
It is indeed undeniable by bounty hunters, because every year the bounty campaign conditions are always different and changing, and specifically for this year I see there are several projects that are very worthy to be promoted by bounty participants, but if we compare it with last year, I think it's still pretty good for this year in terms of bounty campaign.
Escrow or not I will continue to promote any project that's good enough to me, not all good bounty projects will be escrowed and even bounty detective that claimed they are using escrow makes it look like a lie, I don't believe in the escrow strategy
I beg to disagree, Julerz escrowed bounty tokens for bounty hunters and all bounty hunters have received their tokens, some managers are escrowing the bounty token which is good, but if the team is trusted and they show good will it's ok not to do escrow especially if the bounty manager is part of the team, like what Oikos has done.
Both are good bounty manager who already escrow funds for bounty hunters, but for julerz many of bounty managed by him fail and now he stops as manager, different with bountydetective almost all campaign already listed in the market and succeeded, so for me bountydetective better than julerz. Yes Oikos is trusted but don't forget not all project will do the same, so escrow will avoid disappointment
although it's still very difficult to find a bounty with escrow, but here there are still some bounty managers who always use escrow, I'm sure in the future the bounty will be even better
Yes, there are still bounty managers who use escrow even though only one or two people do that, but for now there are still things we can safely follow in terms of trusting a bounty program, and everyone also hopes for the future. all bounty campaigns will come up better than now. 
Escrow actually does not guarantee that the project will succeed, say the manager does the escrow but the project that you are promoting is a scamer, it's the same as you get a token that has no value.
so more important is to pay attention to the project handled by the manager because if the project is good they will most likely pay you.
yes although there are some projects that do not pay, or cut the prize of the hunter.
so more important is to pay attention to the project handled by the manager because if the project is good they will most likely pay you.
yes although there are some projects that do not pay, or cut the prize of the hunter.
It's becoming more harder for new projects team to keep their promises to bounty hunters, some even said bounty hunters are getting free tokens for free, meaning bounty hunters aren't recognized for their work, I suggest all bounty managers to start using ESCROW.
I believe with escrow payment will be guaranteed, team won't be able to go back on their words, bitwings for example, after a complete year of waiting for payment they decide to do another audit on spreadsheet and they falsely accused bounty hunters without any proof.
Bounty Detective is the only bounty manager using escrow, if many bounty managers start using escrow it will be better.
I believe with escrow payment will be guaranteed, team won't be able to go back on their words, bitwings for example, after a complete year of waiting for payment they decide to do another audit on spreadsheet and they falsely accused bounty hunters without any proof.
Bounty Detective is the only bounty manager using escrow, if many bounty managers start using escrow it will be better.
perhaps an update is needed to avoid frequent manipulations, but all of them need quite intense cooperation because problems like this cannot be solved instantly.
it is great to be able to get updated information not to play down the role of others in each project.
I do not understand that what you say has been done by the Bounty Detective, of course it is very good because there is an update created.
but if many accept a project it is certainly not good because many will be harmed, bounty detective will be able to do that without realizing it because it will make a priority scale.
I have also heard that the old bounty manager will return again, that is, bounty portals to be able to return to take part in several new projects and declare that all those who work will certainly get the rights from their work. this is of course new news which is very good and needs to be supported, especially as the old bounty manager (bounty portals) is already very trusted.
Bounties that have escrow have payment guarantees by bounty managers, but bounties now rarely use escrow services because they have the intention to reduce allocations or won't even distribute tokens.
It caused by the manager didn't wanna try to discuss about that but some managers have already started to do this to make its participants to get what they have deserved before. The scam projects will always try to think how to fool the hunters.
It's becoming more harder for new projects team to keep their promises to bounty hunters, some even said bounty hunters are getting free tokens for free, meaning bounty hunters aren't recognized for their work, I suggest all bounty managers to start using ESCROW.
I believe with escrow payment will be guaranteed, team won't be able to go back on their words, bitwings for example, after a complete year of waiting for payment they decide to do another audit on spreadsheet and they falsely accused bounty hunters without any proof.
Bounty Detective is the only bounty manager using escrow, if many bounty managers start using escrow it will be better.
I believe with escrow payment will be guaranteed, team won't be able to go back on their words, bitwings for example, after a complete year of waiting for payment they decide to do another audit on spreadsheet and they falsely accused bounty hunters without any proof.
Bounty Detective is the only bounty manager using escrow, if many bounty managers start using escrow it will be better.
Escrow of bounty reward is good, but it is not a bare minimum for a good Bounty, GeomaDAO was an escrowed Bounty, but seems the pandemic has flawed its growth.
While Cartesi excelled without being escrowed, a paying Bounty will always pay, either escrowed or not which is why you must dyor and join project that worths it for promotion
Bounties that have escrow have payment guarantees by bounty managers, but bounties now rarely use escrow services because they have the intention to reduce allocations or won't even distribute tokens.
It caused by the manager didn't wanna try to discuss about that but some managers have already started to do this to make its participants to get what they have deserved before. The scam projects will always try to think how to fool the hunters.
Jump to: