ETC Group to launch bitcoin ETP on Deutsche Boerse - page 2.

exstasie

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1521

Quote from: fillippone on December 14, 2020, 09:43:01 AM

Of course, it is a healthy check to see outflows from time to time, nevertheless, it is curious, as we witnessed a very close resemblance to Grayscale flows lately (namely: inflows only).

Well, there is a 7-8% premium over spot considering NAV. Maybe someone has stumbled onto an avenue to arbitrage that gap.

Meanwhile, GBTC's premium over spot is up at 30%. In October it was at 8%. That really goes to show the level of interest from institutions over the past couple months!

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 17063

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

Something unexpected happened yesterday: even if grayscale has been churning record after record, eating up Bitcoins like a Blackhole, BTCE experienced their biggest outflow so far.

According to my spreadsheet, they had a 287 Bitcoin outflow yesterday. The biggest to date.

Given they have a tad less than 10,000 BTC as Assets Under Management, this is a significant flow to record.

Of course, it is a healthy check to see outflows from time to time, nevertheless, it is curious, as we witnessed a very close resemblance to Grayscale flows lately (namely: inflows only).

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 17063

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

As "institutional adoption" and "#phase5" have been the name of the game lately, let's look at how BTCP has performed over last month.

As usual, the price has been following the NAV quite closely, but more importantly, inflows have been quite good during the whole month:

Here a numerical detail of the Bitcoin Inflows:

The growth is organic and accelerating, I m bullish on this.

The wallet is growing too, all the assets are covered.

I wish they changed their stance on the wallet addresses, they never revealed other wallet's addresses. So there is a little (300 BTC) difference between officially held BTC and the public wallet we know. I think it's a pity, as this kind of transparency is a unique feature of BTCE, while other issuers chose not to disclose the addresses.

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 17063

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

Quote from: exstasie on October 30, 2020, 02:19:02 PM

Quote from: fillippone on October 30, 2020, 08:45:30 AM

Probably the custodian moved the funds away from to the main depositary wallet to another undisclosed cold wallet.

Or maybe this is the beginning of their fractional reserve practices. Tongue

Sort of an odd amount to withdraw to cold storage, no? If I'm reading the data correctly, it's 335 BTC short from an expected 6,366 BTC in the disclosed address. Maybe there was a redemption that hasn't been reflected in the statement of assets yet.

The difference has been present since my last post almost a month ago, and hasn’t been covered since then. So I think it’s not a delay in “recording” an outflow (that should anyway be accounted in the shares before the real transaction in the wallet.

I doubt it s a fraud as the external auditors anyway certified the “correct” amount.

I do agree it’s a weird practise to publicly disclose an address as “reserve”, only to keep it misaligned with official numbers.

Hopefully they are going to disclose the full list of addresses: it’s detrimental to their own image to show such a low level of transparency after having sold that as a feature of the fund.

exstasie

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1521

Quote from: fillippone on October 30, 2020, 08:45:30 AM

Probably the custodian moved the funds away from to the main depositary wallet to another undisclosed cold wallet.

Or maybe this is the beginning of their fractional reserve practices. Tongue

Sort of an odd amount to withdraw to cold storage, no? If I'm reading the data correctly, it's 335 BTC short from an expected 6,366 BTC in the disclosed address. Maybe there was a redemption that hasn't been reflected in the statement of assets yet.

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 17063

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

it is almost end of Month, and I want to recap the news about our favourite ETP.

Month has been quite good:

Some decent and above all steady inflow have been observed in the last weeks, in correlation with BTCUSD positive momentum.

According to my numbers, that you can check in the spreadsheet, the funds holds 6,434 BTC, up a neat 22% from the start of the month.

We can check the amounts held in the wallet are greater than the required holding, from APEX, the third part accounting check:

Check the original document here.

Oddly enough, the total number of shares is not consistent with the official number in the hanETF website.

We can see that the official wallet has not yet returned back in line with fund's AUM.

Probably the custodian moved the funds away from to the main depositary wallet to another undisclosed cold wallet.

I suspect it would be in fund's better interest to clearly state the list of addresses involved in their custody contract.

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 17063

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

I had a tough about this apparent discrepancy betweenwallet fund and shares informations.

There are at least a couple of reasons why this could have happened:

Someone withdrew their funds from the ETF. The “physical put option”, as they call it (quite confusingly in my opinion), allot investors to take the physical delivery of their bitcoin belt in the ETF. This would result on an outflow from the ETF address and a corresponding drop in the controlled shares. This didn’t happen so it is not probably the cause.
The wallet manager moved the fund to a different address for whatever reason. Either accounts or security protocol reason could be two of many legit drivers for this.
It might be in reality the ETF fund is not only a single address but a proper wallet with various addresses.
Anyway in this case funds are still under ETF control,and shares aren’t decreased.
This is probably what actually happened, as in a statement, the controller of the fund declared the controlled funds are above fund’s obligations.
If you check the following link you will be able to check funds total assets.

Of course these are only educated guesses on what happened. It would be nice to it would be nice to have some information disclosed on both those two facts.

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 17063

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

It is end of Quarter, and it's time to summarise a little bit for our favourite ETP.

The fund price has been tracking the NAV quite closely, and the HELD BTC grew consistently:

Forget Grayscale average premium of 10%, here we are talking about a less than 1% premium of the price over the NAV: basically a tracking error.

The fund ended the quarter with 5,256 BTC under management.

The only thing that doesn't add up is the public wallet of the fund holding far less BTC than expected:

In the last two days there were a couple of outflow that aren't justified by fund redemptions.

It might be related to some kind of pee payment for EoQ, but the amount is too different from what I would have expected.

I will try to discover haw those are justified.

RealMalatesta

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 1150

Obviously these are just the start, we are going to have a lot more than these, we are going to have a lot of options and people will use them a lot as well because these are a lot more trustworthy to people who are used to traditional markets.

If you see people buying into grayscale but not buying bitcoin directly, that is because it is easier for them, specially for people who are over certain age because they believe it is a long term investment (which they are right) and short term is too volatile for them which means they are already old and they do not want that volatility and if they will ever get into crypto it would be via something like grayscale. When those companies make a profit others will see and they will get into the same thing as well giving us a lot more option.

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 17063

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

Quote from: NotATether on September 10, 2020, 10:05:20 AM

I wonder if there are any other bitcoin ETPs or ETFs like BTCE that pose a reasonable alternarive to Grayscale. Specifically, one that is listed on a US exchange for US investors to buy. I can't seem to find any on Google.

There is a limited choice actually.

I answered on my other thread, as I think is more relevant there:
Everything you wanted to know about Grayscale BTC Trust but were afraid to ask!

Hope it helps.

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

I wonder if there are any other bitcoin ETPs or ETFs like BTCE that pose a reasonable alternarive to Grayscale. Specifically, one that is listed on a US exchange for US investors to buy. I can't seem to find any on Google.

From which site are you plotting your BTCE trading graphs from? I'd like to try it and see how many indicators I can plot at once. Currently I get my graphs from Tradingview which only lets me plot 3 indicators at once.

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 17063

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

I finally found a few hours to update the spreadsheet, fixing a few typos, an error in the computation of the "Cryptocurrency Entitlement" and verifying the information flows from the different sources.

To monitor the ETP we have three sources:

the "NAV History" excel linked on the HanETF website
the public wallet of the ETP
the information from financial infoproviders.

All three sources should be giving the same results, as the ETP transparency supposedly is a selling point of this product.

These are the results:

As you can see, the information from the fund's distributor is compatible with that observed on the blockchain, at least until August 26th.
From this date on there are differences that are difficult to reconcile. As you can see this "misalignment" between the two reports, it is not attributable only to the "mismatch" of a few hours with respect to the NAV reporting, probably due to different rules for reporting and for the execution of trades on the Blockchain.

The third source is the one publicly available from financial info providers, and the results are pretty much comparable to the information from the fund. Still, there are a few notable differences (that shouldn't be there)

However, looking at the bright side, I am pleased to notice that the inflows have continued: we are now at almost 5,000 BTC.

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 17063

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

A little update on the Flows observed By BTCE.
With BTC losing ground, we observed the first outflows from the funds.
Nothing to worry about, but quite a strange coincidence:

On the first graph we can see the NAV and the fund's price: here we can see that those are closely related, as highlighted on the second graph: the price's premium on the NAV has been consistently below 1%, averaging 0.76% since inception.

We saw that following drop in prices (top graph) we had a fund outflow. It happened on Aug 26th , and also happened on Sep 4th, the last day on the graph (fund flows are made public on the following day).
The thing that I just discovered is the public address of the fund has still to register this outflow:

We see that on Sep 4th there is no outflow.

This is confirmed on the historic balances:

Actually today it recorded a slight increase in the funds. This is something puzzling me and I am going to investigate about.

The first thing I notice is that the drop I see recorded on Aug 26th is actually mirrored in a Aug 27th outflow in the wallet, so some lag might be involved, but today we are already lagging one day, and we have an increase.

I am going to update the Spreadsheet later today, trying to find an answer to this conundrum.

tyz

legendary

Activity: 3360

Merit: 1533

Quote from: exstasie on September 03, 2020, 04:50:08 AM

Quote from: tyz on September 03, 2020, 03:40:46 AM

Quote from: fillippone on June 09, 2020, 03:55:21 PM

Both points very true.
Germany has a very crypto-friendly regulations...

If you would ever had the experience with the tax office regarding crypto in Germany, you wouldn't dare to make such a statement

Seriously, Germany may be ahead of some states in crypto regulation, but there are still so many unclear issues that often make it difficult to handle with crypto. I have friends in Switzerland and Austria where many things are much easier and more regulated than in Germany. That there is an ETP is also nothing special.

Easy or not, I'd be ecstatic to be able to hold for 1+ year and not pay any capital gains tax. Sounds pretty crypto-friendly to me. That's a pipe dream on this side of the Atlantic.

Well, if you hold it less than a year you pay your personal income tax on gains what means up to 45%. This in turn is then no longer crypto-friendly. The 1+ year rule is not a crypto specific rule and was just overtaken from non-monetary goods where this tax approach is applied for decades, just as for Gold, Silver and similar assets. If it would be regulated properly, then it should be equated with share profits, on which one pays a lump sum of 25% in Germany no matter how long one holds the shares. This would be really crytpo-friendly.

el kaka22

legendary

Activity: 3780

Merit: 1170

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

It is not about easy or difficult, it is about regulations and how well they are done. Right now in my nation there is no regulations, we are so far off than all other nations that our nation doesn't even see it as money so we can do whatever we want without ever worrying about taxes. So, that means am I living in a nation that is easy to use crypto? Obviously I do, I can cash out a million dollars and not pay a single cent and it would still be cool.

However does that mean it is a good thing? Of course not because I am doing this knowing that one day it will be taxed and I am worried how will it be taxed, considering Germany already planned out everything with its regulations, I rather have that over mine. Having regulations that is making it harder is better than having the fear of regulations one day.

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 17063

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

Quote from: exstasie on September 03, 2020, 04:50:08 AM

Quote from: tyz on September 03, 2020, 03:40:46 AM

Quote from: fillippone on June 09, 2020, 03:55:21 PM

Both points very true.
Germany has a very crypto-friendly regulations...

If you would ever had the experience with the tax office regarding crypto in Germany, you wouldn't dare to make such a statement

Seriously, Germany may be ahead of some states in crypto regulation, but there are still so many unclear issues that often make it difficult to handle with crypto. I have friends in Switzerland and Austria where many things are much easier and more regulated than in Germany. That there is an ETP is also nothing special.

Easy or not, I'd be ecstatic to be able to hold for 1+ year and not pay any capital gains tax. Sounds pretty crypto-friendly to me. That's a pipe dream on this side of the Atlantic.

I would be more than ready to wear sock with sandals, learn German grammar and wear short deer trousers in order to being able to avoid any capital gains taxation on my cryptos.
In case, autobahn would be actually a plus.

exstasie

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1521

Quote from: tyz on September 03, 2020, 03:40:46 AM

Quote from: fillippone on June 09, 2020, 03:55:21 PM

Both points very true.
Germany has a very crypto-friendly regulations...

If you would ever had the experience with the tax office regarding crypto in Germany, you wouldn't dare to make such a statement

Seriously, Germany may be ahead of some states in crypto regulation, but there are still so many unclear issues that often make it difficult to handle with crypto. I have friends in Switzerland and Austria where many things are much easier and more regulated than in Germany. That there is an ETP is also nothing special.

Easy or not, I'd be ecstatic to be able to hold for 1+ year and not pay any capital gains tax. Sounds pretty crypto-friendly to me. That's a pipe dream on this side of the Atlantic.

tyz

legendary

Activity: 3360

Merit: 1533

Quote from: fillippone on June 09, 2020, 03:55:21 PM

Both points very true.
Germany has a very crypto-friendly regulations...

If you would ever had the experience with the tax office regarding crypto in Germany, you wouldn't dare to make such a statement

Seriously, Germany may be ahead of some states in crypto regulation, but there are still so many unclear issues that often make it difficult to handle with crypto. I have friends in Switzerland and Austria where many things are much easier and more regulated than in Germany. That there is an ETP is also nothing special.

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 17063

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

Quote from: fillippone on September 02, 2020, 03:03:06 PM

Quote from: exstasie on September 02, 2020, 02:39:40 PM

<...>
I see it's listed on the Deutsche Boerse Xetra, SIX Swiss, and Boerse Stuttgart. Any idea where to find the actual live tickers (not just the fact sheets), with volume and order book info?

I have no clue Sir, but for sure I will be on the case to discover this for you and the other fellow reader.
Rebalancing is, I guess, a common feature of those “fixed leverage” instruments, as they are meant to pay the daily percentual appreciation only.

You can find a good review on many websites:
https://www.morningstar.it/it/etf/snapshot/snapshot.aspx?id=0P0001J2NG

Order book (only first level) you can find those here:
https://www.boerse-stuttgart.de/de-de/produkte/etps/etns/stuttgart/a2781v-21shares-short-bitcoin-sbtc-etp

For depth book level I am afraid you should address your home banking:
https://www.boerse-stuttgart.de/de-de/produkte/etps/etns/stuttgart/a2781v-21shares-short-bitcoin-sbtc-etp/brokerlink

There are many websites: the best one is really down to personal preferences.

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 17063

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

Quote from: exstasie on September 02, 2020, 02:39:40 PM

<...>
I see it's listed on the Deutsche Boerse Xetra, SIX Swiss, and Boerse Stuttgart. Any idea where to find the actual live tickers (not just the fact sheets), with volume and order book info?

I have no clue Sir, but for sure I will be on the case to discover this for you and the other fellow reader.
Rebalancing is, I guess, a common feature of those “fixed leverage” instruments, as they are meant to pay the daily percentual appreciation only.

Topic: ETC Group to launch bitcoin ETP on Deutsche Boerse - page 2. (Read 1636 times)