Topic: ETH - Hardforked - NOT Decentralized - page 2. (Read 5176 times)
Hard fork itself is a success. The DAO coins will not be obtained by the hackers. The existence of ETC has nothing to do with that.
Ethereum Core developer plans to support Ethereum Classic -
https://medium.com/@zsfelfoldi/a-tale-of-two-chains-3f6d58a9df4a#.4vchxki6m
They can say they will support the Classic. But in the end, there will be no Classic to be supported as it will be attacked to death.
As well as the "main" fork.. Both will be attacked to death...
That could be true. But there are big whales in the Ethereum and one Chinese company got more than 400,000 ETH.
Ethereum Core developer plans to support Ethereum Classic -
https://medium.com/@zsfelfoldi/a-tale-of-two-chains-3f6d58a9df4a#.4vchxki6m
They can say they will support the Classic. But in the end, there will be no Classic to be supported as it will be attacked to death.
As well as the "main" fork.. Both will be attacked to death...
Ethereum Core developer plans to support Ethereum Classic -
https://medium.com/@zsfelfoldi/a-tale-of-two-chains-3f6d58a9df4a#.4vchxki6m
They can say they will support the Classic. But in the end, there will be no Classic to be supported as it will be attacked to death.
Ethereum Core developer plans to support Ethereum Classic -
https://medium.com/@zsfelfoldi/a-tale-of-two-chains-3f6d58a9df4a#.4vchxki6m
So far, the hard fork has been a success. The main chain is much longer and has more hashing power than the other chain.
That is right. The question now if the concept of the hard fork and change of the transactions can be accepted by wide community.
The hard fork set a good precedent for getting back the money from thief when the stake is very high.
So far, the hard fork has been a success. The main chain is much longer and has more hashing power than the other chain.
That is right. The question now if the concept of the hard fork and change of the transactions can be accepted by wide community.
So far, the hard fork has been a success. The main chain is much longer and has more hashing power than the other chain.
Hard fork happened in the Ethereum before. It changed from Frontier to Homestead a few months ago.
are you reading this thread? that hard fork was planned and expected and designed to improve the system, something everyone agreed on and was flagged well in advance.
this hard fork is a knee jerk reaction to a poorly designed third party app and solely designed to save asses that don't really deserve to be saved.
Most miners think there should be a hard fork.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4tffta/hard_fork_voting_and_node_adoption_results/?st=iqsyuhdd&sh=7457dd97
Hard fork happened in the Ethereum before. It changed from Frontier to Homestead a few months ago.
are you reading this thread? that hard fork was planned and expected and designed to improve the system, something everyone agreed on and was flagged well in advance.
this hard fork is a knee jerk reaction to a poorly designed third party app and solely designed to save asses that don't really deserve to be saved.
There are active discussion about the hard fork in the Ethereum community. I think it is a decentralised process.
If hadrfork will happen - eth will die because it will be centralized ico scam
Hard fork happened in the Ethereum before. It changed from Frontier to Homestead a few months ago.
If hadrfork will happen - eth will die because it will be centralized ico scam
Please try to understand. ETH hard fork is not DECENTRALIZATION.
Eth project failed if they coul simply press "reset button" as they want.
Vitalik lost his credibility with eth.
Why? ETH isn't centralised BTC. It's may turn out to be centralised in its own way. And it may provided the financial authorities with reassurances that the coin can retrieve stolen funds via a fork. Eth project failed if they coul simply press "reset button" as they want.
Vitalik lost his credibility with eth.
The bitcoin's development is centralised. Many people want big block size, it is not implemented. Ethereum's fate is deteremined by the miners now.
All the coins are centralised in one way or another. I am glad the DAO problem happened so early, the loss can be contained.
If similar problem happened to bitcoin, the damage could be much larger. I hope their SegWit does not have bugs.
That is many lines of new codes. That could be the reason the bitcoin price dropped a lot recently. I am not sure.
The marekt will not react to early to the not released code. That is just reaction to the actual halving.
Please try to understand. ETH hard fork is not DECENTRALIZATION.
Eth project failed if they coul simply press "reset button" as they want.
Vitalik lost his credibility with eth.
Why? ETH isn't centralised BTC. It's may turn out to be centralised in its own way. And it may provided the financial authorities with reassurances that the coin can retrieve stolen funds via a fork. Eth project failed if they coul simply press "reset button" as they want.
Vitalik lost his credibility with eth.
The bitcoin's development is centralised. Many people want big block size, it is not implemented. Ethereum's fate is deteremined by the miners now.
All the coins are centralised in one way or another. I am glad the DAO problem happened so early, the loss can be contained.
If similar problem happened to bitcoin, the damage could be much larger. I hope their SegWit does not have bugs.
That is many lines of new codes. That could be the reason the bitcoin price dropped a lot recently. I am not sure.
Please try to understand. ETH hard fork is not DECENTRALIZATION.
Eth project failed if they coul simply press "reset button" as they want.
Vitalik lost his credibility with eth.
Why? ETH isn't centralised BTC. It's may turn out to be centralised in its own way. And it may provided the financial authorities with reassurances that the coin can retrieve stolen funds via a fork. Eth project failed if they coul simply press "reset button" as they want.
Vitalik lost his credibility with eth.
The bitcoin's development is centralised. Many people want big block size, it is not implemented. Ethereum's fate is deteremined by the miners now.
All the coins are centralised in one way or another. I am glad the DAO problem happened so early, the loss can be contained.
If similar problem happened to bitcoin, the damage could be much larger. I hope their SegWit does not have bugs.
Please try to understand. ETH hard fork is not DECENTRALIZATION.
Eth project failed if they coul simply press "reset button" as they want.
Vitalik lost his credibility with eth.
Why? ETH isn't centralised BTC. It's may turn out to be centralised in its own way. And it may provided the financial authorities with reassurances that the coin can retrieve stolen funds via a fork. Eth project failed if they coul simply press "reset button" as they want.
Vitalik lost his credibility with eth.
The bitcoin's development is centralised. Many people want big block size, it is not implemented. Ethereum's fate is deteremined by the miners now.
All the coins are centralised in one way or another. I am glad the DAO problem happened so early, the loss can be contained.
Please try to understand. ETH hard fork is not DECENTRALIZATION.
Eth project failed if they coul simply press "reset button" as they want.
Vitalik lost his credibility with eth.
Why? ETH isn't centralised BTC. It's may turn out to be centralised in its own way. And it may provided the financial authorities with reassurances that the coin can retrieve stolen funds via a fork. Eth project failed if they coul simply press "reset button" as they want.
Vitalik lost his credibility with eth.
The bitcoin's development is centralised. Many people want big block size, it is not implemented. Ethereum's fate is deteremined by the miners now.
Jump to: