Topic: [ETH] SimpleDice - EthVenturesFinal attachment (Read 1218 times)
ok people dont want to play dice, fine, i have a better app coming out soon, stay tuned
Looks like players start to play it, it's good, and the attachment works flawlessly, dividends are also being paid out
It's not working!
The transfer to the Ethventures Contract ran into an error. And not any dividends where paid out! See https://etherscan.io/address/0xee462a6717f17c57c826f1ad9b4d3813495296c9#internaltx . After Block 1307118 there was no payment to the investors.
Bunch of troll account here:
695871000000000000 wei has been paid out in dividends, just check the ABI from he Mist wallet
Thats : 0.695871 ETH
I like how my jealous competitors create newbie account here to troll
This would have been a good idea if you had done it when you already had 4-5 well established and profitable apps. It's pure speculation otherwise.
Now 1/4 chance to win nearly nothing.
How can we play if there is nothing on the contract?
How can we play if there is nothing on the contract?
Looks like players start to play it, it's good, and the attachment works flawlessly, dividends are also being paid out
It's not working!
The transfer to the Ethventures Contract ran into an error. And not any dividends where paid out! See https://etherscan.io/address/0xee462a6717f17c57c826f1ad9b4d3813495296c9#internaltx . After Block 1307118 there was no payment to the investors.
People should learn to use and show test contracts before claiming things work flawlessly.
Looks like players start to play it, it's good, and the attachment works flawlessly, dividends are also being paid out
It's not working!
The transfer to the Ethventures Contract ran into an error. And not any dividends where paid out! See https://etherscan.io/address/0xee462a6717f17c57c826f1ad9b4d3813495296c9#internaltx . After Block 1307118 there was no payment to the investors.
Have a feeling BetGod is also this guy, www.bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=687379 (btc-raffle.com)
Just the way he seems to be pretending to be a good programmer to impress while complimenting himself with many alt accounts.
I could be wrong though.
I know what I can't be wrong about:
He is idiot.
Just the way he seems to be pretending to be a good programmer to impress while complimenting himself with many alt accounts.
I could be wrong though.
I know what I can't be wrong about:
He is idiot.
No One is playing, look at transaction history.
Only OP chatting with his multiple accounts to promote his scam.
Only OP chatting with his multiple accounts to promote his scam.
Yap, it does look cool, but i wait for more people to play it.
I hope it gets big
I hope it gets big
Looks like players start to play it, it's good, and the attachment works flawlessly, dividends are also being paid out
Yap, it does look cool, but i wait for more people to play it.
I hope it gets big
I hope it gets big
Once shapeshift.io gets back online, ill be trying this out... until then good luck
It's back online now, good luck with my dice
Reviewed the code , it works flawless, good luck with this!
Thanks for kind words, its really a good project, the coin flip game is simple and exciting!
Once shapeshift.io gets back online, ill be trying this out... until then good luck
It's back online now, good luck with my dice
Once shapeshift.io gets back online, ill be trying this out... until then good luck
No fee needed !
Final Version
- Attached to EthVenturesFinal
- Fixed a small bug, now the probability is 25% as told in the description
- House fee lowered to 5%, and all fees go to EthVenturesFinal investors
Enjoy new and improved dice game!
The odds of winning this are actually 50/50 
I know, i meant to write there 50%, it was a typo.
I will deploy a new version soon, but i have to fix my EthVenture first
The randomizer is definitely improved over the last one! However, it's still not a 25% chance, I think it's more like 50%!!
This first piece of the conditional is not random and doesn't serve much purpose: uint(sha3(gamblerlist[list_length].etherAddress,list_length))
A player can know ahead of time what their address is and what the list_length is and can perform an sha3() on that. You can not use already known data to generate a random number.
The next part of the conditional is trickier: uint(sha3(msg.gas))
In this case the sha3() is being performed on the gas that was spent. I'm not certain what is involved in calculating that number, this may well provide an acceptable amount of entropy, or at least a greater challenge to calculate.
When you add those parts together you end up with a single very large number: uint(sha3(gamblerlist[list_length].etherAddress,list_length)) + uint(sha3(msg.gas))
The problem is that very large number is being run through a modulus of 2: % 2==0
That will return either a 0 or a 1 depending on if the number is even or odd, which is a 50% chance, not 25%. You probably want to use % 4==0 to determine if your pseudo-random number is divisible by 4.
The odds of winning this are actually 50/50
Code:
if(uint(sha3(gamblerlist[list_length].etherAddress,list_length))+uint(sha3(msg.gas)) % 2==0 && Bankroll > 0) //if the hashed length of your address is even,
{ //which is a 25% chance, then you get paid out all balance!
{ //which is a 25% chance, then you get paid out all balance!
This first piece of the conditional is not random and doesn't serve much purpose: uint(sha3(gamblerlist[list_length].etherAddress,list_length))
A player can know ahead of time what their address is and what the list_length is and can perform an sha3() on that. You can not use already known data to generate a random number.
The next part of the conditional is trickier: uint(sha3(msg.gas))
In this case the sha3() is being performed on the gas that was spent. I'm not certain what is involved in calculating that number, this may well provide an acceptable amount of entropy, or at least a greater challenge to calculate.
When you add those parts together you end up with a single very large number: uint(sha3(gamblerlist[list_length].etherAddress,list_length)) + uint(sha3(msg.gas))
The problem is that very large number is being run through a modulus of 2: % 2==0
That will return either a 0 or a 1 depending on if the number is even or odd, which is a 50% chance, not 25%. You probably want to use % 4==0 to determine if your pseudo-random number is divisible by 4.
The odds of winning this are actually 50/50
SCAM
How? It's a dice game.
What is scam about that?
SCAM
Hmm this one looks better dude, much much better than the previous, it seems like you have been working hard in the past days.
I really like that, you are a very dedicated person to your work, and that can be admired in a developer.
I really like that, you are a very dedicated person to your work, and that can be admired in a developer.
Jump to: