Ethereum Fork good or bad? | Bitcointalksearch.org

dumada

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: Perman on September 10, 2016, 11:34:58 AM

Quote from: Minecache on August 14, 2016, 03:54:31 AM

Quote from: Kellor on August 14, 2016, 03:14:49 AM

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 13, 2016, 12:48:04 AM

Quote from: GreenBits on August 12, 2016, 02:38:38 PM

Apparently, the hard fork needed to happen. The resulting clusterfuck has revealed the true attitude toward the project the developers have, that is, this is more about profit than ideology. I'm not naive; I have bills and shit too and I understand how the world works. But these conflicts of interest are damn near criminal at this point, I hope people understand that the criticisms that some of us had with ETH didn't go away with the fork.

Fool me three.times, what's the saying for that?

Yes the fork is actually one of the best things that has happened for the original chain. Profiteer Vitalik and the corrupt Ethereum foundation had to go. It was nice of them to voluntarily step out and continue on with their own platform.

If you do not like the Profiteer Vitalik and the corrupt Ethereum foundation, you can create a coin and a foundation yourself.

Exactly this. ETH is the real deal. Any haters can piss off to the criminal coin ETC. They won't be missed. Fools.

The problem is that the Etheruem Foundation and the Vitalik own too many ETC, they do not want to crash the price of ETC.

I do not think the ETC is relevant any more. The microsoft and other companies will will use the Etheruem chain.

Perman

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: Minecache on August 14, 2016, 03:54:31 AM

Quote from: Kellor on August 14, 2016, 03:14:49 AM

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 13, 2016, 12:48:04 AM

Quote from: GreenBits on August 12, 2016, 02:38:38 PM

Apparently, the hard fork needed to happen. The resulting clusterfuck has revealed the true attitude toward the project the developers have, that is, this is more about profit than ideology. I'm not naive; I have bills and shit too and I understand how the world works. But these conflicts of interest are damn near criminal at this point, I hope people understand that the criticisms that some of us had with ETH didn't go away with the fork.

Fool me three.times, what's the saying for that?

Yes the fork is actually one of the best things that has happened for the original chain. Profiteer Vitalik and the corrupt Ethereum foundation had to go. It was nice of them to voluntarily step out and continue on with their own platform.

If you do not like the Profiteer Vitalik and the corrupt Ethereum foundation, you can create a coin and a foundation yourself.

Exactly this. ETH is the real deal. Any haters can piss off to the criminal coin ETC. They won't be missed. Fools.

The problem is that the Etheruem Foundation and the Vitalik own too many ETC, they do not want to crash the price of ETC.

dumada

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: Perman on August 27, 2016, 05:06:43 AM

Quote from: Kellor on August 15, 2016, 10:06:28 AM

Quote from: funbitcoins on August 14, 2016, 05:43:06 AM

Quote from: Boxxl on July 18, 2016, 02:03:53 AM

Hi,

I'm confused..
The hard fork.. Is it good or bad for the future of ethereum?

Hardfork is no good or bad. It's a matter whether it is necessary or not. If hardfork is necessary then it should implement as required.

But reasoning behind this hardfork is some people worrying about.

Majority of the people who voted thought the hard fork was necessary, so the hard fork happened. Otherwise, there would be no hard fork.

That could be the reason why most people still support the ETH and the price is ETH is about 10 times higher than ETC.

The price of the ETC is quite volatile. That might due the price is more manipulated by big whales. Somebody is making good money there.

Perman

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: Kellor on August 15, 2016, 10:06:28 AM

Quote from: funbitcoins on August 14, 2016, 05:43:06 AM

Quote from: Boxxl on July 18, 2016, 02:03:53 AM

Hi,

I'm confused..
The hard fork.. Is it good or bad for the future of ethereum?

Hardfork is no good or bad. It's a matter whether it is necessary or not. If hardfork is necessary then it should implement as required.

But reasoning behind this hardfork is some people worrying about.

Majority of the people who voted thought the hard fork was necessary, so the hard fork happened. Otherwise, there would be no hard fork.

That could be the reason why most people still support the ETH and the price is ETH is about 10 times higher than ETC.

Kellor

sr. member

Activity: 278

Merit: 250

Quote from: funbitcoins on August 14, 2016, 05:43:06 AM

Quote from: Boxxl on July 18, 2016, 02:03:53 AM

Hi,

I'm confused..
The hard fork.. Is it good or bad for the future of ethereum?

Hardfork is no good or bad. It's a matter whether it is necessary or not. If hardfork is necessary then it should implement as required.

But reasoning behind this hardfork is some people worrying about.

Majority of the people who voted thought the hard fork was necessary, so the hard fork happened. Otherwise, there would be no hard fork.

funbitcoins

full member

Activity: 191

Merit: 100

Let's have fun!

Quote from: Boxxl on July 18, 2016, 02:03:53 AM

Hi,

I'm confused..
The hard fork.. Is it good or bad for the future of ethereum?

Hardfork is no good or bad. It's a matter whether it is necessary or not. If hardfork is necessary then it should implement as required.

But reasoning behind this hardfork is some people worrying about.

Minecache

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1024

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: Kellor on August 14, 2016, 03:14:49 AM

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 13, 2016, 12:48:04 AM

Quote from: GreenBits on August 12, 2016, 02:38:38 PM

Apparently, the hard fork needed to happen. The resulting clusterfuck has revealed the true attitude toward the project the developers have, that is, this is more about profit than ideology. I'm not naive; I have bills and shit too and I understand how the world works. But these conflicts of interest are damn near criminal at this point, I hope people understand that the criticisms that some of us had with ETH didn't go away with the fork.

Fool me three.times, what's the saying for that?

Yes the fork is actually one of the best things that has happened for the original chain. Profiteer Vitalik and the corrupt Ethereum foundation had to go. It was nice of them to voluntarily step out and continue on with their own platform.

If you do not like the Profiteer Vitalik and the corrupt Ethereum foundation, you can create a coin and a foundation yourself.

Exactly this. ETH is the real deal. Any haters can piss off to the criminal coin ETC. They won't be missed. Fools.

bbc.reporter

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1492

Please do not be hurt with what I said. It is because of his actions that caused all the mayhem in the Ethereum fork. The original Ethereum classic is now slowly stepping on solid ground thanks to the foundation provided by Charles Hoskinson.

Kellor

sr. member

Activity: 278

Merit: 250

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 13, 2016, 12:48:04 AM

Quote from: GreenBits on August 12, 2016, 02:38:38 PM

Apparently, the hard fork needed to happen. The resulting clusterfuck has revealed the true attitude toward the project the developers have, that is, this is more about profit than ideology. I'm not naive; I have bills and shit too and I understand how the world works. But these conflicts of interest are damn near criminal at this point, I hope people understand that the criticisms that some of us had with ETH didn't go away with the fork.

Fool me three.times, what's the saying for that?

Yes the fork is actually one of the best things that has happened for the original chain. Profiteer Vitalik and the corrupt Ethereum foundation had to go. It was nice of them to voluntarily step out and continue on with their own platform.

If you do not like the Profiteer Vitalik and the corrupt Ethereum foundation, you can create a coin and a foundation yourself.

bbc.reporter

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1492

Quote from: GreenBits on August 12, 2016, 02:38:38 PM

Apparently, the hard fork needed to happen. The resulting clusterfuck has revealed the true attitude toward the project the developers have, that is, this is more about profit than ideology. I'm not naive; I have bills and shit too and I understand how the world works. But these conflicts of interest are damn near criminal at this point, I hope people understand that the criticisms that some of us had with ETH didn't go away with the fork.

Fool me three.times, what's the saying for that?

Yes the fork is actually one of the best things that has happened for the original chain. Profiteer Vitalik and the corrupt Ethereum foundation had to go. It was nice of them to voluntarily step out and continue on with their own platform.

Altitude

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

a hard fork itself isnt bad , its why it happened the dev took advantage of a loop hole and fucked everyone (Just my thoughts)

Gutembergin

full member

Activity: 176

Merit: 100

at first I thought it was possibly good and wud save the coin, now i think the guy took advantage of louphole and fucked everyone Angry

GreenBits

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1048

Apparently, the hard fork needed to happen. The resulting clusterfuck has revealed the true attitude toward the project the developers have, that is, this is more about profit than ideology. I'm not naive; I have bills and shit too and I understand how the world works. But these conflicts of interest are damn near criminal at this point, I hope people understand that the criticisms that some of us had with ETH didn't go away with the fork.

Fool me three.times, what's the saying for that?

Kellor

sr. member

Activity: 278

Merit: 250

Quote from: crypto jerk on August 12, 2016, 12:44:51 PM

Quote from: Kewatia on August 12, 2016, 11:32:39 AM

Quote from: buyinbtc on August 12, 2016, 09:51:42 AM

it was definitely a really bad thing to be honest, in my opinion ethereum hard fork was a really bad thing, right now there is 2 currencies that compete

I do not think there will competition between two currencies. As long as the DAO robinhood white hats do not return the stolen etc funds, ETh is a scam coin.

The same would apply to the whilte hat and black hat. If either of them does not return the funds, ETC is a scam.

crypto jerk

full member

Activity: 236

Merit: 100

Quote from: Kewatia on August 12, 2016, 11:32:39 AM

Quote from: buyinbtc on August 12, 2016, 09:51:42 AM

it was definitely a really bad thing to be honest, in my opinion ethereum hard fork was a really bad thing, right now there is 2 currencies that compete

I do not think there will competition between two currencies. As long as the DAO robinhood white hats do not return the stolen etc funds, ETh is a scam coin.

Kewatia

sr. member

Activity: 299

Merit: 250

Quote from: buyinbtc on August 12, 2016, 09:51:42 AM

it was definitely a really bad thing to be honest, in my opinion ethereum hard fork was a really bad thing, right now there is 2 currencies that compete

I do not think there will competition between two currencies. As long as the DAO hacker does not return the stolen funds, ETC is a scam coin.

buyinbtc

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1010

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

it was definitely a really bad thing to be honest, in my opinion ethereum hard fork was a really bad thing, right now there is 2 currencies that compete

dumada

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 11, 2016, 08:31:25 PM

Quote from: RoseMann on August 11, 2016, 12:40:27 PM

Some thoughts for your question:

The Fork itself will not determine weather ETC or ETH will be successful in the long run.
but it did fuck over the original holders of Etherium by making them choose a path so to speak, if they chose wrong it could be devastating.
However it is entirely possible for both coins to do well, ongoing.

You are wrong. All ETH prefork have the equivalent amount of ETC. So it is not making them "choose" which path they should go. They can go both paths and it is advisable that they should hold both ETH and ETC. In the future both will diverge and it will be correct to cheer for the success of both. The success of one or the other will make the value of your portfolio higher.

I think I will just hold one Etheruem, the ETH. The ETC has already damaged by the DAO hacker by stealing 3.6 million coins.

bbc.reporter

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1492

Quote from: RoseMann on August 11, 2016, 12:40:27 PM

Some thoughts for your question:

The Fork itself will not determine weather ETC or ETH will be successful in the long run.
but it did fuck over the original holders of Etherium by making them choose a path so to speak, if they chose wrong it could be devastating.
However it is entirely possible for both coins to do well, ongoing.

You are wrong. All ETH prefork have the equivalent amount of ETC. So it is not making them "choose" which path they should go. They can go both paths and it is advisable that they should hold both ETH and ETC. In the future both will diverge and it will be correct to cheer for the success of both. The success of one or the other will make the value of your portfolio higher.

RoseMann

sr. member

Activity: 270

Merit: 250

Some thoughts for your question:

The Fork itself will not determine weather ETC or ETH will be successful in the long run.
but it did fuck over the original holders of Etherium by making them choose a path so to speak, if they chose wrong it could be devastating.
However it is entirely possible for both coins to do well, ongoing.

Topic: Ethereum Fork good or bad? (Read 3199 times)