@CoinHoarder
You repeat yourself.
@all
The assumption is that Ethereum makes it easier to develop decentralized applications. I cannot see proof of that because Ethereum is not out there. It is as simple as that.
Furthermore, it is one thing to develop an application, another thing to deploy it for the first time and even another thing to keep it updated (e.g. in case of bugs). Next thing, how is the difference in the perception for the users? How do they choose the decentralized application out there on Ethereum? How do they choose/agree on updates (if any; if not, than an update is simply another application)?
So, where is the difference to the already existing applications out there? And if there is an difference, is this difference a benefit?
Because it is obvious that they are wrong.
I ask questions because this is a forum and because I can. I do not see how this relates to the benefits of Ethereum.
The assumption is that Ethereum makes it easier to develop decentralized applications. I cannot see proof of that because Ethereum is not out there. It is as simple as that.
Furthermore, it is one thing to develop an application, another thing to deploy it for the first time and even another thing to keep it updated (e.g. in case of bugs). Next thing, how is the difference in the perception for the users? How do they choose the decentralized application out there on Ethereum? How do they choose/agree on updates (if any; if not, than an update is simply another application)?
So, where is the difference to the already existing applications out there? And if there is an difference, is this difference a benefit?
@ChuckOne: You repeat yourself.
If you're asking why somebody would use it instead of something already here, take a look at
these examples. Why would you not consider using an Ethereum contract before starting a large Java project, for example?
Anyway, I agree with CoinHoarder; I don't think any answer will satisfy you.
