Next day after Eurovision CHA CHA CHA still sounds in my head. Similar like POE POE POE POE POE, but I'm surprised that Austria finished so low and both people and judges didn't liked them.
I'm curious about which betting platforms were accepting bets for the Eurovision song contest?
I think that most of platforms had Eurovision, after all it's big thing in Europe.
Finland almost won after being so behind after judges voted. For some reason I don't like judges voting they tend to vote for more known names.
Wouldn't say that they almost won, difference between Sweden and Finlandwas not few points, but almost 60.
Loreen's song was ok, with that voice you can make anything sound more than decent, but i think it was travesty that Sweden won. Finland would have won by landslide a with old rules without judges. I mean even the audience was chanting CHA CHA CHA loudly right after Sweden got their win, so that must have been an awkward moment for Loreen as käärijä had won the hearts of the public already.
I honestly feel like this might have something to do with the fact that next year when Sweden gets to host Eurovision (they are good hosts so it will be great tv), Abba turns 50 years. And sweden wasn't top favourite in public vote of any country. That seems like judges would have been paid off and whole thing planned.
And i lost money by betting on Käärijä, but i can't complain for that as that was exciting as hell to the end.
Don't want to make conspiracy theories, but voting of judges always been contraversial part of Eurovision. Especially when you see such huge difference between people and judges voting. Why they can't leave decide it for people, why some expets is needed who pretend to understand music better? Have nothing against Loreen, but Kaarija won my heart too and voting without judges would be less contraversial.