Author

Topic: Eventually, 1xbit has launched its new Signature campaign. (Update: 26-05-2021) (Read 1146 times)

legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
It's been noticed 1xbit has started another signature campaign on the forum. Here is the links, 1xbit.com signature campaign (open). And another is review campaign 1xbit.com honest review campaign (open). Seems they have resolution thread in reputation where they aren't enough friendly to solve forum accusation. There are a few members are applying to the campaign. Fund for the campaign wasn't escrowed. I have created the flag against the new account of 1xbit in the main post.
full member
Activity: 868
Merit: 150
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
How many more quotes will you need? I didn't get my deposited funds yet.
I have to say that you won't get that deposited funds anytime soon, 1xbit is a proven scamming website so no matter how persistent you are in this forum and not pursuing legal actions I think that you won't be getting those money that they have stolen from you. I hope that they won't come back in this forum but considering they are attracting non-forum users, I think that they are still going strong.
jr. member
Activity: 237
Merit: 3
Thread is back to reputation, we were planning to post directly to scam accusation thread, but some users find it negative that's why we moved the thread back in reputation board.

if your account was banned by a mistake, we will solve it.  
In other cases, all I can is to tell the exact reason for banning.

But keep in mind, even if the player has cheated - he will get deposited funds back.

How many more quotes will you need? I didn't get my deposited funds yet.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1375
Slava Ukraini!
I didn't say that, did I? BestChange has no such reputation issue although some guys tried to make it turbid. Yobit indirectly have promoted themselves with help from reputed campaign manager, Betcoin.ag launched campaign (even though they are shady) with help from reputed campaign manager. But when 1xbit started, that's where the problem is because they are scammer, scammer because they did such a thing which was done by others too but they are not scammer.
Yeah and it was my point, I wanted to mention BestChange as good example. And I remember these accusations against them which were made just because some people didn't knew anything about website.
These things that you said looks like double standards. But you probably remember that there was lot of drama about Yobit/Cryptotalk campaign, especially when they wanted to advertise ponzi scheme. While accusations against Betcoin.ag were made 4 years, I'm not sure how much things had changed since then. But if nothing has changed about their shady behaviour, then it's strange that nobody aren't talking about it.
But nobody didn't forced 1xbit to cancel campaign, they decided it themselves. And I haven't seen any DT members that they are going to tag participants, there was just some warnings from other users about potential risk to advertise this website.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
its obvious that it has a smiley to it but 1xbit just took it seriously that makes it funnier.
Well, it came trough my mind that 1xbit will take this seriously so I removed that line but as someone quoted it I placed it back and added smiley.

If that someone quoting you was me, I'm sorry Smiley I have a good sense of humor and I was amused seeing your post as I am sure many others laughed. And I laughed even more seeing them actually starting a campaign. Of course that move on their side was a bad one but still it looked funny.

Maybe they should create new account and resolve al.... Lips sealed Lips sealed

Don't give them new ideas Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 322
Campaign without reputable manager isn't always bad thing,
I didn't say that, did I? BestChange has no such reputation issue although some guys tried to make it turbid. Yobit indirectly have promoted themselves with help from reputed campaign manager, Betcoin.ag launched campaign (even though they are shady) with help from reputed campaign manager. But when 1xbit started, that's where the problem is because they are scammer, scammer because they did such a thing which was done by others too but they are not scammer.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1375
Slava Ukraini!
They had rejected all the complaint because all the cases were related to multi-accounting, may be?
Maybe yes, maybe no. But knowing their and their main company 1xbit reputation, I doubt about it. I don't think that there is so many people who violated their rules

Quote
Well, they could simply create a gambling forum and ask everyone to create an account on their site and hire a reputed and respected campaign manager, the campaign would be legal. But they are more clever and tried to manage the campaign themselves.
Hey, don't give them ideas Cheesy. But I doubt that hiring manager would help them. I remember when there was some issues on Livecoin exchange, there was lot of drama about their campaign and Hhampuz and he had to close campaign. Campaign without reputable manager isn't always bad thing, what BestChange example shows.
1xbit can have their campaign here, but personally I wouldn't consider to join it. Participants of such campaign should know what they are advertising and that some DT members may decide to tag them.
copper member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 737
✅ Need Campaign Manager? TG > @TalkStar675
1xbit has currently discontinued their signature campaign and locked the thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54973195
At last they realised that their aggressive move will not gonna bring good results for them. Lets see how much time they take to resolve their issues.  

What a 'surprise'
They need to work much harder to fix things here in bitcointalk forum.
We are all waiting for more 'fertile' times
Much surprising for the participants who applied and deleted their applications after getting the confirmation from 1xBit.

Maybe they should create new account and resolve al.... Lips sealed Lips sealed
Maybe this time they are not going to follow your suggestion. Although anything is possible when its "1xBit".  
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Maybe they should create new account and resolve al.... Lips sealed Lips sealed
Is this another one coming from you? Now once they will do that then we will have 100% confirmation that you and them are working together. Maybe you are an alt of them :-P
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
its obvious that it has a smiley to it but 1xbit just took it seriously that makes it funnier.
Well, it came trough my mind that 1xbit will take this seriously so I removed that line but as someone quoted it I placed it back and added smiley.

Maybe they should create new account and resolve al.... Lips sealed Lips sealed
legendary
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1054
1xbit has currently discontinued their signature campaign and locked the thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54973195
What a 'surprise'
They need to work much harder to fix things here in bitcointalk forum.
We are all waiting for more 'fertile' times

marlboroza and 1xBet are working together :-D
He has a weird sense of humor

its obvious that it has a smiley to it but 1xbit just took it seriously that makes it funnier.

they need more funds to rebuild their reputation to the community, they'd made so much scam almost too impossible to fix already that they gave up even before starting to repair it. they deleted their reputation thread where they intend to fix the scam accusations. they should have express they are willing to fix the accusations while the signature campaign is running, it might just help them.
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 734
Bitcoin is GOD
Quote
- arbitraging
I'm not familiar with this. Is it related to sport betting?
Arbitraging in sports bets is no different than arbitraging stocks or cryptocurrencies, as an example suppose there is a coin trading at 1 dollar in an exchange but in a different exchange the coin is trading at 1.05 dollars, in theory you could buy the coin at the exchange where it is the cheapest and then sell it for a profit in the exchange in which is more expensive.

A similar process can be achieved with sports bets but instead of looking at the price you will be looking at the odds offered by the casinos, obviously even if this is not cheating in any way casinos do not like arbers as they do not lose money like the average gambler does.
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 322
And after all, did they solved at least one scam accusation? Because I haven't seen anything.
They had rejected all the complaint because all the cases were related to multi-accounting, may be?
If yobit can run their campaign here by the name of cryptotalk, if other gambling sites can run their service without any problem even after doing shady things, then what's wrong with running 1xbit sig campaign? Well, they could simply create a gambling forum and ask everyone to create an account on their site and hire a reputed and respected campaign manager, the campaign would be legal. But they are more clever and tried to manage the campaign themselves.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
1xbit has currently discontinued their signature campaign and locked the thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54973195
What a 'surprise'
They need to work much harder to fix things here in bitcointalk forum.
We are all waiting for more 'fertile' times

marlboroza and 1xBet are working together :-D
He has a weird sense of humor
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Users are usualy accused of cheating when:
 - multiaccounting
I've always wondered why the casino gets to keep the player's profit and thus make more money for themselves. I'd say this shouldn't earn the casino money, so even if the player can't have it, some charity might be a good option.

Quote
- arbitraging
I'm not familiar with this. Is it related to sport betting?

Quote
- using VPN/proxy to connect from a banned country
Is this really different than physically travelling abroad to gamble online?

Quote
- abusing bonuses
This I can agree with.

Quote
- exploiting vulnerabilities on the website or taking advantage of bugs on the game itself
This I can agree with too. And I don't understand why the casino would say to return the deposited funds in this case.

Quote
- double spending a deposit transaction on casinos accepting zero-confirmation transactions
That's just dumb, wait for at least a confirmation. As far as I know there isn't a single exchange that accepts zero-confirmation transactions, why would a casino be any different?

Quote
There are different ways for users to cheat but the problem and what happens usually is that casinos use the above excuses to ban whover they want without having to provide any evidence.
All the more reason the casino shouldn't profit from banning users.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
1xbit has currently discontinued their signature campaign and locked the thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54973195

Quote
We don't want participants of our campaign to receive negative feedback for wearing our signature, that's why we are pausing the campaign.

We will relaunch it once there is a fertile environment for launching it.  (locking thread to avoid off topic posts)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54973195


I like the reasoning though. :-D
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 2248
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
1xbit has currently discontinued their signature campaign and locked the thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54973195
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
@1xbet you should run signature campaign here, you will clean your status in no time...  Grin

Ironically or not, after marlboroza posted that suggestion (in an obvious humorous manner), they just started the signature campaign lol. What were the odds?
That's it!
marlboroza and 1xBet are working together :-D
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Flag supported.

I just noticed another thing which is sort of funny:

@1xbet you should run signature campaign here, you will clean your status in no time...  Grin

Ironically or not, after marlboroza posted that suggestion (in an obvious humorous manner), they just started the signature campaign lol. What were the odds?
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Question is what will happen to all the people who applied for campaign... maybe yobit2 scenario?

My suggestion would be to ignore the lemmings. Unlike yobit's investbox bullshit that broke the proverbial camel's back, this is not an obvious ponzi.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
They opened topic to offer 'fake helping people' who accused them for scam before, just so they could start their new bounty campaign.
Super fast way to get many negative feedbacks on their profile.
Question is what will happen to all the people who applied for campaign... maybe yobit2 scenario?
I am waiting to see how this story will end Smiley

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
And after all, did they solved at least one scam accusation?

No. They opened a thread offering to resolve issues, waited for a couple of days, got a couple of complaints, and rejected them. It seems to have been a show with no real intent to fix anything.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1375
Slava Ukraini!
There is several warnings about 1xbit in campaign thread given, so this why probably some users withdraw their applications. Seems that many people applying immediately after seing open campaign without making even minimal research about website that they are going to promote.
1xbit don't have escrow for their campaign, but I doubt that they are going to scam participants - it probably would be too much even for 1xbit. What is more concerning that they didn't hired campaign manager and they are going to manage campaign themselves.
And after all, did they solved at least one scam accusation? Because I haven't seen anything.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3507
Crypto Swap Exchange
I noticed that there were a lot of members withdrawing their applications in the campaign thread.  Did I miss a thread in which someone threatened to tag campaign participants?  There could be no other reason for a bunch of people deciding not to participate, and I've never seen the first few pages of a campaign ANN thread look like 1xbit's does.
 

I think this thread is in question, he caused a mass withdrawal.
they automatically write the application post, now withdraw their application instructed by previous experience with Yobit campaign and tagging users from there. plus it's not some serious money offered there, not worth the risk to ruin account because of 1xbit.
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
I noticed that there were a lot of members withdrawing their applications in the campaign thread.  Did I miss a thread in which someone threatened to tag campaign participants?  There could be no other reason for a bunch of people deciding not to participate, and I've never seen the first few pages of a campaign ANN thread look like 1xbit's does.

That being said, 1xbit is doing nothing to clear their name from the initial scam accusation, so I'm sure the tags will remain till that happens.
Man, I don't even remember what the deal is with 1xbit; I'll have to look at their feedback after posting this.  Anyway, not addressing multiple scam accusations is the tactic Yobit has taken for years, and it's not the right way to handle things if you're the business being accused of scamming.  

Edit:
Ah, I guess this is a bunch of old issues coming to the fore because of this thread.  I understand now, though I barely remember their name.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Actually, flag is invalid:

Anyone supporting this flag please think this through. I think type 2 or 3 flags should be created by actual victims and if evidence is there - you can support those, making type 1 redundant. Failing to do that, to base a type 1 flag on circumstantial evidence you need to be able to show how an average person is at high-risk of losing money with 1xBit.

copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1814
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
There are people like JollyGood who would change their negative into neutral just when a campaign is launched .. just like Jolly changed his feedback for bestchange so maybe a good idea to run a campaign, pay some coins to dogs and get the negative feedback removed. Well done.
Did you even fall the whole accusation against bestchange how it was concluded? When did bestchange ever scam anyone? Can you point it out? Stop this crap of comparing the bestchange situation to serial scammers like 1xbit



Lol, they did ignore what i wrote in the other thread of theirs. Stupid Move. Good luck getting rid of the new negative ratings on your profile  1xbit_official. You just made things worse.
I don't want to be the prophet of doom but the attempt to clean their negative ratings using a signature campaign could be a total fail. Just remember what happened to the likes of Yobit, Livecoin, p2pb2b2...  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
I also tagged them and will only remove my tag, if they resolve all ongoing scam accusations.
When they said they are here to resolve all issues, I don't think they really mean that.
I guess a lot of them don't even know anything about 1xbit and scam accusations against them. OK, now they have gone red and things are different.
Yep, not everyone here is familiar with shady gambling sites so when such users see signature campaign they just join it. It is good to see that users are withdrawing their applications. (Archived for record http://archive.is/8hPpF)
OP, why have you refereced the thread by 1xbit in the flag? Once that is deleted, it will be an invalid flag.
Actually, flag is invalid:
Quote
You must link to a topic documenting your specific concerns. Someone visiting your topic should get a clear idea of what this flag is about. The topic must not be self-moderated.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 3045
Top Crypto Casino
And how could a player cheat?

The definition of cheating here depends essencially on the casino's T&C.

Users are usualy accused of cheating when:
 - multiaccounting
 - arbitraging
 - using VPN/proxy to connect from a banned country
 - abusing bonuses
 - exploiting vulnerabilities on the website or taking advantage of bugs on the game itself
 - double spending a deposit transaction on casinos accepting zero-confirmation transactions
 ...

There are different ways for users to cheat but the problem and what happens usually is that casinos use the above excuses to ban whover they want without having to provide any evidence.
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 322
I added some more food supplies to: @ 1xbit_official, to warn, "the food they serve is very poisonous" there are many fraud cases that have not been resolved by their team and site.
People can only add such food supplies to other people who don't have a position here, who don't have people to BACK them. On the other hand, there are other poisonous food which everyone knows poisonous but react as delicious because a group of people are saying delicious. Thanks to the group for saying so. Otherwise, some people wouldn't have their meal as they couldn't eat poisonous food.

I supported the flag because 1xbit/bet deserve that.
Edit- OP, why have you refereced the thread by 1xbit in the flag? Once that is deleted, it will be an invalid flag.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
They just moved their resolution thread back to the reputation board from archival and edited the title and content of the thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54938685
Let's see: https://loyce.club/archive/details/topic_5266815.html

But keep in mind, even if the player has cheated - he will get deposited funds back.
Why would you do that? And how could a player cheat? Usually, that shouldn't be possible.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3507
Crypto Swap Exchange
but seems lots of users applying them even they are aware of 1xbit shady behavior.
20 bucks is 20 bucks  Grin

I guess a lot of them don't even know anything about 1xbit and scam accusations against them. OK, now they have gone red and things are different.

There are people like JollyGood who would change their negative into neutral just when a campaign is launched .. just like Jolly changed his feedback for bestchange so maybe a good idea to run a campaign, pay some coins to dogs and get the negative feedback removed. Well done.
No user would rescind his feedback because a website launched a signature campaign, in the case of best change, they were able to clear their websites name and even at that, the red tags still remained, but then their signature campaign went on for months and the users in the campaign were paid smoothly as well the fact that there was no fresh issue against their website, so it's fair to say the website can be trusted and thus almost every user who had initially left a negative, revised it to a positive or neutral. That being said, 1xbit is doing nothing to clear their name from the initial scam accusation, so I'm sure the tags will remain till that happens.


do not compare these two situations. BestChange successfully solved all (one) accusations against them. even those that are not directly their fault.
Feedbacks like "Multiple active scam accusations against this site (1xBit)" they look much more serious, and it takes more effort than signature campaign if they want to improve his rating.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1302
There are people like JollyGood who would change their negative into neutral just when a campaign is launched .. just like Jolly changed his feedback for bestchange so maybe a good idea to run a campaign, pay some coins to dogs and get the negative feedback removed. Well done.
No user would rescind his feedback because a website launched a signature campaign, in the case of best_change, they were able to clear their websites name and even at that, the red tags still remained, but then their signature campaign went on for months and the users in the campaign were paid smoothly as well the fact that there was no fresh issue against their website, so it's fair to say the website can be trusted and thus almost every user who had initially left a negative, revised it to a positive or neutral.

That being said, 1xbit is doing nothing to clear their name from the initial scam accusation, so I'm sure the tags will remain till that happens.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 4417
Top-tier crypto casino and sportsbook
Even after I and several other people posted warnings in their bounty campaign thread, there are still people applying.

It looks like some people really don't care what they're promoting if they make at least a few bucks - what a shame.

Edit: Tagged from my end and it will remain same until they solve all the accusations.   

I also tagged them and will only remove my tag, if they resolve all ongoing scam accusations.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 2
There are people like JollyGood who would change their negative into neutral just when a campaign is launched .. just like Jolly changed his feedback for bestchange so maybe a good idea to run a campaign, pay some coins to dogs and get the negative feedback removed. Well done.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
but seems lots of users applying them even they are aware of 1xbit shady behavior.
20 bucks is 20 bucks  Grin
In other cases, all I can is to tell the exact reason for banning.
Can you say exact reason for:
they now basically saying that I was multi accounting and arbitraging with them which is a complete joke
Explain how this person cheated your site and your reasoning behind stealing their funds.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Thread is back to reputation, we were planning to post directly to scam accusation thread, but some users find it negative that's why we moved the thread back in reputation board.

if your account was banned by a mistake, we will solve it.  
In other cases, all I can is to tell the exact reason for banning.

But keep in mind, even if the player has cheated - he will get deposited funds back.

You haven't solved anything and your reasons don't make sense. In a he said / she said scenario I would trust SyGambler far more than I would trust you unless proven otherwise.

Removing the thread like that without explanation looked like an attempt to bury complaints expressed in the thread. It took red trust to bring it back therefore red trust will stay so that you don't get tempted to pull something like this again.
copper member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 737
✅ Need Campaign Manager? TG > @TalkStar675
I know blaming them wouldn't change anything. As you mentioned in the recent case, probably they are friendly to resolve accusations against them. But 1xbit is different from them since even they deleted their resolution thread. They are thinking simply to run a campaign would clean their old bad records. But most probably it will fail when gamblers will encounter again their ToS drama.
Without resolving accusations they are just trying to run their signature. Isn’t it enough for you to detect that they are quite aggressive in this field ?    

I am completely agree with "Royse777" and we should stop talking about them. It was their responsibility to resolve all the issues before running the campaign but sorry to say that our expectations was too much high. Anyway, Let them follow their way and follow your own.

Edit: Tagged from my end and it will remain same until they solve all the accusations.   
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
I added some more food supplies to: @ 1xbit_official, to warn, "the food they serve is very poisonous" there are many fraud cases that have not been resolved by their team and site.

@Coolcryptovator, create a flag.



But keep in mind, even if the player has cheated - he will get deposited funds back.
We need proof, 1xbit site victim funds, if you return it to the victim.

Everyone can talk, but until now you have not shown the results, that you finish it.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 2248
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
Thread is back to reputation, we were planning to post directly to scam accusation thread, but some users find it negative that's why we moved the thread back in reputation board.
Why was the thread moved initially and the original content and title edited out?

if your account was banned by a mistake, we will solve it.  
In other cases, all I can is to tell the exact reason for banning.
Reasons would need to be backed up by proof, it's not enough to say, 'user X is connected to user Y who was banned from the website', you would also need to establish the connection and present the evidence, otherwise every website could arbitrarily lock users out after they win.
copper member
Activity: 744
Merit: 23
Thread is back to reputation, we were planning to post directly to scam accusation thread, but some users find it negative that's why we moved the thread back in reputation board.

if your account was banned by a mistake, we will solve it.  
In other cases, all I can is to tell the exact reason for banning.

But keep in mind, even if the player has cheated - he will get deposited funds back.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1041
Well maybe they realized that hiring some campaign participants will help them to restore their reputation. They are seeing example in the recent days. So, why blaming them only :-P
I know blaming them wouldn't change anything. As you mentioned in the recent case, probably they are friendly to resolve accusations against them. But 1xbit is different from them since even they deleted their resolution thread. They are thinking simply to run a campaign would clean their old bad records. But most probably it will fail when gamblers will encounter again their ToS drama.

They deleted the first post of the resolution thread.  And no escrow hired for their campaign, its not good.

DTs will probably interfere with what they are doing. The number of scam accusations to them are just intolerable especially the ones where they use their TOS excuse to blocked accounts. I don't think it will be solved by just runing a campaign.


legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 2248
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
They just moved their resolution thread back to the reputation board from archival and edited the title and content of the thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54938685
It was likely a response to this thread and the negative feedbacks left on their profile. This shows they had no intention of clearing their name or attending to the complaints by users, but are rather looking for ways to improve their public image and promote their website.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
I know blaming them wouldn't change anything. As you mentioned in the recent case, probably they are friendly to resolve accusations against them. But 1xbit is different from them since even they deleted their resolution thread. They are thinking simply to run a campaign would clean their old bad records. But most probably it will fail when gamblers will encounter again their ToS drama.
As concern users we can do our job (flagging, tagging) without making much talk about it. The more you type the sites name (xxxx, yyyy) the more it helps them to rank in the search engine.

These ToS, failed KYC are gone too far lately. It's like if you win too much we will take your winnings but if you lose then you are VIP for us. There are nothing more to talk about these recent events happening around. All are very similar cases.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
Well maybe they realized that hiring some campaign participants will help them to restore their reputation. They are seeing example in the recent days. So, why blaming them only :-P
I know blaming them wouldn't change anything. As you mentioned in the recent case, probably they are friendly to resolve accusations against them. But 1xbit is different from them since even they deleted their resolution thread. They are thinking simply to run a campaign would clean their old bad records. But most probably it will fail when gamblers will encounter again their ToS drama.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Well maybe they realized that hiring some campaign participants will help them to restore their reputation. They are seeing example in the recent days. So, why blaming them only :-P


For the record those who do not understand this post, it's a sarcasm.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
Here is the thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-signature-campaign-legendary-sr-25-spots-5267371

Although I don't want to see their advertisement on the forum unless they solve all the issues, but seems lots of users applying them even they are aware of 1xbit shady behavior. It's pretty clear they aren't friendly enough to resolve all the issues raised against them even they had opened the resolution thread. Moving resolution thread on Archival and delete thread prove they don't care about forum users opinions.

Edit; seems they moved the resolution thread again on the reputation.

Support/oppose flag type-1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2204

It would be nice to create flag type 2 or 3 by the victim.

Update: 26-05-2021

New signature campaign thread launched: 1xbit.com signature campaign (open).  
Review campaign: 1xbit.com honest review campaign (open).

Flags against new account: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/eventually-1xbit-has-launched-its-new-signature-campaign-update-26-05-2021-5267853
Jump to: