On the other hand, the Anti martingale strategy is- to double the bet size when you are winning & halving the bet size when you are losing. In such a condition, when you are winning; you are doubling the size & you will lose from your winning. WEell, this strategy is more risky I guess though some have told it as less risky than martingale.
Have you ever tried ti? What's your opinion? Which one is more risky; Martingale or Anti Martingale?
The essence is still Martingale, you are doubling your bet based on an outcome. If you are doubling bets only after you win (which is not as often as when you lose) it will easily drain you of your balance because long streaks doesn't happen as often. Also when you're halving your bet every time you lose, eventually you will have zeroes out your bet amount that it becomes ineligible for you to play as long lose streaks tend to happen more. Anything that doubles the bet no matter the outcome of one roll is is bound to lose you money in the long run.