Topic: 🔥🔥🔥🏈⚽ EVERBET.IO: MULTI-CHAIN SOCIAL BETTING DAPP !!! ⚽🏈🔥🔥🔥 (Read 542 times)
24hr bump
24hr bump
Telegram is ok. Wish I could share the ideas on some sort of decentralized/peer-to-peer Telegram-like messenger. The messages on the messenger should be peer-to-peer/decentralized, immutable, secure, activities fairly transparent, should be privacy-friendly/anonymity-friendly, application open-source/transparent, etc. I should be able to have our messages in a node I fully control. Our message should be throughly encrypted and immutable. The peer would own/have their decryption keys to decrypt their messages.
Note: not investing....just advising/sharing ideas(for free)
I like the idea. Something good can be done if your team managed this platform properly. Since this concept is new, there will be many challenges. I hope you can overcome all the challenges and make this site live.
Because of this concept it will be easier to bet between friends. I liked the platform so I will try to join the testnet program.
Because of this concept it will be easier to bet between friends. I liked the platform so I will try to join the testnet program.
Thank you!
We seem to got an unexpected advisor/investor from that field. Will tell more if there is something substantial.
We look forward to seeing something big. I always support them if I find something new, I think if I support them they are able to provide something good. Because those who try to do something new, if they can get enough support then they try to do something big with their abilities. I will keep an eye on the progress of your platform from now.
I like the idea. Something good can be done if your team managed this platform properly. Since this concept is new, there will be many challenges. I hope you can overcome all the challenges and make this site live.
Because of this concept it will be easier to bet between friends. I liked the platform so I will try to join the testnet program.
Because of this concept it will be easier to bet between friends. I liked the platform so I will try to join the testnet program.
Thank you!
We seem to got an unexpected advisor/investor from that field. Will tell more if there is something substantial.
I like the idea. Something good can be done if your team managed this platform properly. Since this concept is new, there will be many challenges. I hope you can overcome all the challenges and make this site live.
Because of this concept it will be easier to bet between friends. I liked the platform so I will try to join the testnet program.
Because of this concept it will be easier to bet between friends. I liked the platform so I will try to join the testnet program.
Hi,
did you join the telegram already?
https://t.me/everbet_io
Likely through the selection of randomized referees that get rewards for acting as such (that part is actually the most complicated in terms of doing-it-right).
You mean moderators (at randomized "referees") . Still close in meaning though, assuming you are referring to mods.
I guess you mean randomizing the referees is difficult to do or you are not sure how to go about selecting quality referees through the randomized process?
Actually it is both: a) difficult on-chain to get reliable randomness b) it is probably even more difficult to find quality referees.
Especially the referee part of the dapp needs very careful planning from our side but b) should be solvable with a good-enough incentive in terms of rewards vs. reputation.
btw: I favor the term "referee" because it makes clear that this person is supposed to be independent from the devs/admins of the contract.
Wish we could discuss this somewhere else so I don't derail from the main subject of your post. Will be willing to share ideas with you on a safe channel. I just want this to be right so people/bettors don't get themselves into problems in the betting/predictions markets.
I think both admin and referee are OK as long as they are decentralized and random
did you join the telegram already?
https://t.me/everbet_io
Sounds interesting.
I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.
It is planned to address such bets through a community governance process.I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.
Likely through the selection of randomized referees that get rewards for acting as such (that part is actually the most complicated in terms of doing-it-right).
You mean moderators (at randomized "referees") . Still close in meaning though, assuming you are referring to mods.
I guess you mean randomizing the referees is difficult to do or you are not sure how to go about selecting quality referees through the randomized process?
Actually it is both: a) difficult on-chain to get reliable randomness b) it is probably even more difficult to find quality referees.
Especially the referee part of the dapp needs very careful planning from our side but b) should be solvable with a good-enough incentive in terms of rewards vs. reputation.
btw: I favor the term "referee" because it makes clear that this person is supposed to be independent from the devs/admins of the contract.
Wish we could discuss this somewhere else so I don't derail from the main subject of your post. Will be willing to share ideas with you on a safe channel. I just want this to be right so people/bettors don't get themselves into problems in the betting/predictions markets.
I think both admin and referee are OK as long as they are decentralized and random
Sounds interesting.
I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.
It is planned to address such bets through a community governance process.I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.
Likely through the selection of randomized referees that get rewards for acting as such (that part is actually the most complicated in terms of doing-it-right).
You mean moderators (at randomized "referees") . Still close in meaning though, assuming you are referring to mods.
I guess you mean randomizing the referees is difficult to do or you are not sure how to go about selecting quality referees through the randomized process?
Actually it is both: a) difficult on-chain to get reliable randomness b) it is probably even more difficult to find quality referees.
Especially the referee part of the dapp needs very careful planning from our side but b) should be solvable with a good-enough incentive in terms of rewards vs. reputation.
btw: I favor the term "referee" because it makes clear that this person is supposed to be independent from the devs/admins of the contract.
Wish we could discuss this somewhere else so I don't derail from the main subject of your post. Will be willing to share ideas with you on a safe channel. I just want this to be right so people/bettors don't get themselves into problems in the betting/predictions markets.
I think both admin and referee are OK as long as they are decentralized and random
24hr bump
Sounds interesting.
I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.
It is planned to address such bets through a community governance process.I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.
Likely through the selection of randomized referees that get rewards for acting as such (that part is actually the most complicated in terms of doing-it-right).
You mean moderators (at randomized "referees") . Still close in meaning though, assuming you are referring to mods.
I guess you mean randomizing the referees is difficult to do or you are not sure how to go about selecting quality referees through the randomized process?
Actually it is both: a) difficult on-chain to get reliable randomness b) it is probably even more difficult to find quality referees.
Especially the referee part of the dapp needs very careful planning from our side but b) should be solvable with a good-enough incentive in terms of rewards vs. reputation.
btw: I favor the term "referee" because it makes clear that this person is supposed to be independent from the devs/admins of the contract.
Sounds interesting.
I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.
It is planned to address such bets through a community governance process.I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.
Likely through the selection of randomized referees that get rewards for acting as such (that part is actually the most complicated in terms of doing-it-right).
You mean moderators (at randomized "referees") . Still close in meaning though, assuming you are referring to mods.
I guess you mean randomizing the referees is difficult to do or you are not sure how to go about selecting quality referees through the randomized process?
It feels great, when you are the Beta Tester for an awesome project.
The site has a really unique concept of social Gambling
And to be honest i really like it.
But it would have been better if you could have mentioned more about the details of the game in the OP itself.
Moreover as the site will not accept Bitcoin, or currently not accepting Bitcoins, then it should be Moved to Altcoins section.
Nevertheless a cool project, which every one will love to be the part of it.
The site has a really unique concept of social Gambling
And to be honest i really like it.
But it would have been better if you could have mentioned more about the details of the game in the OP itself.
Moreover as the site will not accept Bitcoin, or currently not accepting Bitcoins, then it should be Moved to Altcoins section.
Nevertheless a cool project, which every one will love to be the part of it.
Hi,
thank you. WBTC (wrapped Bitcoin) will be supported.
It feels great, when you are the Beta Tester for an awesome project.
The site has a really unique concept of social Gambling
And to be honest i really like it.
But it would have been better if you could have mentioned more about the details of the game in the OP itself.
Moreover as the site will not accept Bitcoin, or currently not accepting Bitcoins, then it should be Moved to Altcoins section.
Nevertheless a cool project, which every one will love to be the part of it.
The site has a really unique concept of social Gambling
And to be honest i really like it.
But it would have been better if you could have mentioned more about the details of the game in the OP itself.
Moreover as the site will not accept Bitcoin, or currently not accepting Bitcoins, then it should be Moved to Altcoins section.
Nevertheless a cool project, which every one will love to be the part of it.
Dapp is always considered safe since it is decentralized, but I suggest them to use a dummy account of metamask, not your main wallet.
Upon having quick research, this is a very good project that would be improved. But I really find the initiation impressive. Instead
of leaving feedback on the telegram group, I will be leaving suggestions on this one. I'll be trying the Dapp and will leave one here, then after instead. Can you initiate a promotion?
Upon having quick research, this is a very good project that would be improved. But I really find the initiation impressive. Instead
of leaving feedback on the telegram group, I will be leaving suggestions on this one. I'll be trying the Dapp and will leave one here, then after instead. Can you initiate a promotion?
Yeah, something like this would work. It really depends how frequently the dapp is being used.
I could imagine it like this:
- Everyone having rep > 0 can vote to get it banned or shadow banned.
- If a certain threshold is reached (time vs amount of voters for example), an independent referee is selected randomly who does the final decision and gets rewarded for it.
- If the selected referee doesn't react within a certain time-frame, another one will be chosen.
- In order to become a referee, you need to stake X amount of EVREP tokens but you'll earn actual eth/trx/bnb rewards (to prevent clash of interest).
You always need to keep in mind that this won't run automatically on the blockchain (it's not threaded).
The above would for example getting triggered only as soon as somebody interacts with the contracts (voting, adding bets, creating booths, withdraw gains, mining rep, etc).
This is always the logic lies within any system. Just liked that idea that you have made. I could imagine it like this:
- Everyone having rep > 0 can vote to get it banned or shadow banned.
- If a certain threshold is reached (time vs amount of voters for example), an independent referee is selected randomly who does the final decision and gets rewarded for it.
- If the selected referee doesn't react within a certain time-frame, another one will be chosen.
- In order to become a referee, you need to stake X amount of EVREP tokens but you'll earn actual eth/trx/bnb rewards (to prevent clash of interest).
You always need to keep in mind that this won't run automatically on the blockchain (it's not threaded).
The above would for example getting triggered only as soon as somebody interacts with the contracts (voting, adding bets, creating booths, withdraw gains, mining rep, etc).
It's basically the if, yes or no statement that devs do, I'm not a developer but somehow knew about that logic only. It's just for that show of banned events. I'll check if there are other things that I can suggest for your platform since it's running on different networks.
Thanks for having your time to answer my suggestion.
Upon visiting the link, I tried clicking bet on Ethereum and I was ask to connect my metamask to it. May I know if it is safe to connect our metamask wallet in your platform even if it is still in the testing phase?
I am hesitant in connecting my wallet as I have stored most of my currencies there and I cannot afford to lost a single in my portfolio.
I am hesitant in connecting my wallet as I have stored most of my currencies there and I cannot afford to lost a single in my portfolio.
Hi,
yes, it is safe. As it doesn't interact with mainnet.
All you need to do is switch to "Ropsten Testnet" in MetaMask and get some test ETH from here:
https://faucet.ropsten.be/
or from here
https://faucet.metamask.io/
Upon visiting the link, I tried clicking bet on Ethereum and I was ask to connect my metamask to it. May I know if it is safe to connect our metamask wallet in your platform even if it is still in the testing phase?
I am hesitant in connecting my wallet as I have stored most of my currencies there and I cannot afford to lost a single in my portfolio.
I am hesitant in connecting my wallet as I have stored most of my currencies there and I cannot afford to lost a single in my portfolio.
I just dive opun this project today and I was happy to give it a try since it is at it testing mode and does not require real deposits to go through the various games and betting on the site. But one thing I could not get now is the deposit process and it timing, I will be following up with the development to see how things unfold in the future.
Hi,
you need a web3 wallet extension for your browser (usually Metamask).
Then in the wallet, switch to "Ropsten Testnet".
As soon as you did that, the page will reload and give you the options to create bets. In the wallet-less version these buttons are hidden.
You can get test ETH from the link in the site's HowTo section (the faucet links).
Upon creating a bet, you basically decide the duration of the event. Betting will be possible from the point the event has been submitted until the event actually starts.
Once the event is expired, the voting phase begins (or the booth owner concludes the bet if he bought the right to conclude instead of voting, see "my account" => "manage booth").
I just dive opun this project today and I was happy to give it a try since it is at it testing mode and does not require real deposits to go through the various games and betting on the site. But one thing I could not get now is the deposit process and it timing, I will be following up with the development to see how things unfold in the future.
Upon looking up to this thread and reading comment, I became interested with the concept of this social betting. Although I got confused for a minute, I’m glad that OP had explained the idea in the comments. I’ll be trying this one out now.
Jump to: