The majority do not realize that the signature managers ask a lot from the campaigner and they have to conform whether it be learning to write English or even if the person does not have a GED to pass their campaign standards.
I am just hoping for the new year that the people who are calling the legtimate people spammers on the forums see them as employees of a campaign that have to obey what the managers tell them they have to do and not threaten their job performance. Cause at the end of the day, it is a job. And how would you like it if you were criticized by others for doing a job. The managers are the ones who decide if the employee gets fired or not. Let them decide.
Good will towards men!
Happy New years and lets hope it is a better one than the one that has just concluded.
I can confirm that:
One of those negative trust scores was from the user that gave me negative trust.
The other of those negative trust scores was from a user that was trying to spam high-up members, typically choosing staff and moderators (don't know why I was chosen?).
So, both of the trust scores (i feel) were not legitimate!
In addition, I feel that the capitalisation of web addresses is quite rediculous!