Pages:
Author

Topic: Everyone In a Signature Campaign Is a Spammer? - page 2. (Read 1604 times)

copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
But you had 2 negative trust before that time so that might have contributed to this accusation of being a spammer.

The majority do not realize that the signature managers ask a lot from the campaigner and they have to conform whether it be learning to write English or even if the person does not have a GED to pass their campaign standards.
I am just hoping for the new year that the people who are calling the legtimate people spammers on the forums see them as employees of a campaign that have to obey what the managers tell them they have to do and not threaten their job performance. Cause at the end of the day, it is a job. And how would you like it if you were criticized by others for doing a job. The managers are the ones who decide if the employee gets fired or not. Let them decide.

Good will towards men!

Happy New years and lets hope it is a better one than the one that has just concluded.  Smiley

I can confirm that:
One of those negative trust scores was from the user that gave me negative trust.
The other of those negative trust scores was from a user that was trying to spam high-up members, typically choosing staff and moderators (don't know why I was chosen?).

So, both of the trust scores (i feel) were not legitimate!


In addition, I feel that the capitalisation of web addresses is quite rediculous!
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
Not everyone, but a lot of them are spammer(s) (mostly jr.member - member etc.. but also sr. member).
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
EtherSphere - Social Games
But you had 2 negative trust before that time so that might have contributed to this accusation of being a spammer.

The majority do not realize that the signature managers ask a lot from the campaigner and they have to conform whether it be learning to write English or even if the person does not have a GED to pass their campaign standards.
I am just hoping for the new year that the people who are calling the legtimate people spammers on the forums see them as employees of a campaign that have to obey what the managers tell them they have to do and not threaten their job performance. Cause at the end of the day, it is a job. And how would you like it if you were criticized by others for doing a job. The managers are the ones who decide if the employee gets fired or not. Let them decide.

Good will towards men!

Happy New years and lets hope it is a better one than the one that has just concluded.  Smiley
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
Looks like someone that was unable to sell a domain for a month got butthurt.
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
I find this quite strange, is everyone in a signature campaign considered a scammer or a spammer?

I have negative feedback from a person that claims that I am a spammer, his reference is only ONE link though. That was also when I was new to this forum and had only been a member with it for a few weeks!

Your opinions on my trust and this matter would be very usefule.

Thank you in advance.

Jack G
Pages:
Jump to: