the new driver is slower , the faster driver is 399.24
Nah, I used the new 411.64 drivers for days, and now after 0.6 update I get a slightly less hashrate. 
Topic: EWBF's Cuda Equihash Miner 0.6 - page 9. (Read 85733 times)
the new driver is slower , the faster driver is 399.24
192_7 performance increased 5Sol/s per card!!! VERY NICE!
I see some minor performance decrease on 96_5 compared to 0.5
what gpu?
I will test it out on other 1060 6GB rigs, and also on 1060 3GB rigs and we will see.
Can you please give an additional info, cuda 8 or 9 and win or linux. Thanks.
I used 0.5 for a while.
So 1060 G1 it's around 500-1k sol less. On 1060 Aorus it's 500-700 more on 6 GPUs. 1060 3GB Gaming X around 500 less.
I see some minor performance decrease on 96_5 compared to 0.5
what gpu?
I will test it out on other 1060 6GB rigs, and also on 1060 3GB rigs and we will see.
Can you please give additional info, cuda 8 or 9 and win or linux. Thanks.
I see some minor performance decrease on 96_5 compared to 0.5
what gpu?
I will test it out on other 1060 6GB rigs, and also on 1060 3GB rigs and we will see.
Version 0.6 has been released.
In the next version additional improvements, Turing support, cuda 9.2 will replace 9.1 and probably will be added cuda 10 versions.
Yes, it should work.
The miner continues to work as long as the connection to the pool is alive, otherwise the devfee will be stopped, and the miner will try to restore connection with the pool. I'll connect my rig to Zergpool to see the situation.
In the next version additional improvements, Turing support, cuda 9.2 will replace 9.1 and probably will be added cuda 10 versions.
Im running SMOS with this miner and was looking to upgrade my Nvidia to Cuda 9.2
I wanted to know if this miner is backward compatible?
Will it work with newer Nvidia drivers?
I wanted to know if this miner is backward compatible?
Will it work with newer Nvidia drivers?
Yes, it should work.
Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
The miner continues to work as long as the connection to the pool is alive, otherwise the devfee will be stopped, and the miner will try to restore connection with the pool. I'll connect my rig to Zergpool to see the situation.
Any improvements in 0.6 according to 0.5 ?
I updated the performance measurements in the first post.
96_5 uses ~1.6GB vram
1050ti ~7.8 KS/s
1060 ~14 KS/s
1070 ~20 KS/s
1080 ~25 KS/s
1080ti ~37 KS/s
192_7 uses ~2.5GB vram
1050ti ~8 S/s
1060 ~15 S/s
1070 ~22 S/s
1080 ~24 S/s
1080ti ~35 S/s
144_5 uses ~1.63GB vram
1050ti ~18 S/s
1060 ~30 S/s
1070 ~45 S/s
1080 ~50 S/s
1080ti ~75 S/s
210_9(aion) uses 1.2G vram
1050ti ~75 S/s
1060 ~130 S/s
1070 ~190 S/s
1080 ~210 S/s
1080ti ~320 S/s
for 144_5 3 - 15 %
for 192_7 ~10 %
for 96_5 ~2-5 %
I see some minor performance decrease on 96_5 compared to 0.5
what gpu?
Version 0.6 has been released.
In the next version additional improvements, Turing support, cuda 9.2 will replace 9.1 and probably will be added cuda 10 versions.
Yes, it should work.
The miner continues to work as long as the connection to the pool is alive, otherwise the devfee will be stopped, and the miner will try to restore connection with the pool. I'll connect my rig to Zergpool to see the situation.
In the next version additional improvements, Turing support, cuda 9.2 will replace 9.1 and probably will be added cuda 10 versions.
Im running SMOS with this miner and was looking to upgrade my Nvidia to Cuda 9.2
I wanted to know if this miner is backward compatible?
Will it work with newer Nvidia drivers?
I wanted to know if this miner is backward compatible?
Will it work with newer Nvidia drivers?
Yes, it should work.
Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
The miner continues to work as long as the connection to the pool is alive, otherwise the devfee will be stopped, and the miner will try to restore connection with the pool. I'll connect my rig to Zergpool to see the situation.
Any improvements in 0.6 according to 0.5 ?
I see some minor performance decrease on 96_5 compared to 0.5
Version 0.6 has been released.
In the next version additional improvements, Turing support, cuda 9.2 will replace 9.1 and probably will be added cuda 10 versions.
Yes, it should work.
The miner continues to work as long as the connection to the pool is alive, otherwise the devfee will be stopped, and the miner will try to restore connection with the pool. I'll connect my rig to Zergpool to see the situation.
In the next version additional improvements, Turing support, cuda 9.2 will replace 9.1 and probably will be added cuda 10 versions.
Im running SMOS with this miner and was looking to upgrade my Nvidia to Cuda 9.2
I wanted to know if this miner is backward compatible?
Will it work with newer Nvidia drivers?
I wanted to know if this miner is backward compatible?
Will it work with newer Nvidia drivers?
Yes, it should work.
Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
The miner continues to work as long as the connection to the pool is alive, otherwise the devfee will be stopped, and the miner will try to restore connection with the pool. I'll connect my rig to Zergpool to see the situation.
Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
Does this happen oftenly? Do any balances appear after you mined for 1 day? Have experienced this on different pool but they still show the right correct balance. Maybe it's on the pools side that has the problem.Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
Does this happen oftenly? Do any balances appear after you mined for 1 day? Have experienced this on different pool but they still show the right correct balance. Maybe it's on the pools side that has the problem. Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
Don't know has anyone reported. But there is a problem. Miner mines but nothing is shown on the pool. Rig just disappears. Caught it several times with different rigs. Zergpool on 144_5 algo.
Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
Not sure whether it is pool or miner or pool/miner fault.
Im running SMOS with this miner and was looking to upgrade my Nvidia to Cuda 9.2
I wanted to know if this miner is backward compatible?
Will it work with newer Nvidia drivers?
I wanted to know if this miner is backward compatible?
Will it work with newer Nvidia drivers?
If i use --fee 0 my performance will lower than if i use default --fee 2?
EWBF ?
No.
EWBF_, in next ver could you add an avg speed readout for avg sol/s, averaging the sol/s over the runtime of the miner since last start, and also avg efficiency in sol/w (averaging all cards together) over the runtime since last start?
Well, this is not a problem, only since version 0.7.
Not working with turing GPU RTX 2080, Linux, driver 410.57
Unfortunately, I'm still waiting for my RTX card. But thanks for the information.
hi,
start mine BTG
with
2x1070
1x1080
nooverclok
one of 1070 start but bet error, stoped responde,
would like to know if posible to set intensity for each gpu, and how do that command line on bat. file.
using w10
tks,
if i start mine BTG with one card work without prolem.
start mine BTG
with
2x1070
1x1080
nooverclok
one of 1070 start but bet error, stoped responde,
would like to know if posible to set intensity for each gpu, and how do that command line on bat. file.
using w10
tks,
if i start mine BTG with one card work without prolem.
Hi, if gpu does not respond, it means that the thread gets stuck in the cuda call, if this happens - you need to first check this gpu, its memory and all the cables connected to it. the --intensity parameter works similarly to --cuda_devices, for example: --cuda_devices 0 1 2 3 --intensity 64 64 1 64 sets the intensity 1 to gpu 2.
If i use --fee 0 my performance will lower than if i use default --fee 2?
EWBF ?
Is EWBF's Cuda Equihash Miner 0.5 open source?
Nope. It's not opensource. Mose Equihash mining software are not opensource. If you are finding other open source alternatives, sorry but what i know is they don't publish open source software.
Is EWBF's Cuda Equihash Miner 0.5 open source?
EWBF_, in next ver could you add an avg speed readout for avg sol/s, averaging the sol/s over the runtime of the miner since last start, and also avg efficiency in sol/w (averaging all cards together) over the runtime since last start?
Jump to: