EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 224. | Bitcointalksearch.org

EWBF_

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 160

Quote from: krnlx on January 17, 2017, 02:58:30 PM

BUG:

Linux , 6x1070 rig. When I select solvers manual, miner hangs and there are endless retries to restart

But in auto mode works well

Code:

./eqm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --user XXXX.`hostname` --pass x --port 3333 --solver 1
+---------------------------------+
| EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.2.0b |
+---------------------------------+
INFO: Target: 0020c49ba5e353f7...
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
INFO: Detected new work: a717ea1d90077263db6d
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
INFO 22:54:37: GPU2 Accepted share 56ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 22:54:37: GPU4 Accepted share 51ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 22:54:37: GPU4 Accepted share 101ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 22:54:39: GPU2 Accepted share 56ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 22:54:40: GPU1 Accepted share 55ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 22:54:41: GPU4 Accepted share 54ms [A:3, R:0]
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
INFO: Detected new work: d366aaf19174cd5af797
INFO 22:54:48: GPU0 Accepted share 55ms [A:1, R:0]
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1

Upd. Bug appears in all solvers 0-3, no messages in dmesg with Nvidia errors,etc. With overclock, or without

Thanks for information.

krnlx

full member

Activity: 243

Merit: 105

BUG:

Linux , 6x1070 rig. When I select solvers manual, miner hangs and there are endless retries to restart

But in auto mode works well

Code:

./eqm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --user XXXX.`hostname` --pass x --port 3333 --solver 1
+---------------------------------+
| EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.2.0b |
+---------------------------------+
INFO: Target: 0020c49ba5e353f7...
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
INFO: Detected new work: a717ea1d90077263db6d
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
INFO 22:54:37: GPU2 Accepted share 56ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 22:54:37: GPU4 Accepted share 51ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 22:54:37: GPU4 Accepted share 101ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 22:54:39: GPU2 Accepted share 56ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 22:54:40: GPU1 Accepted share 55ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 22:54:41: GPU4 Accepted share 54ms [A:3, R:0]
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
INFO: Detected new work: d366aaf19174cd5af797
INFO 22:54:48: GPU0 Accepted share 55ms [A:1, R:0]
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1

Upd. Bug appears in all solvers 0-3, no messages in dmesg with Nvidia errors,etc. With overclock, or without

Hurtman

full member

Activity: 180

Merit: 100

no speed up in GTX 980 (((

EWBF_

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 160

Quote from: reb0rn21 on January 17, 2017, 02:52:26 PM

Quote from: Kompik on January 17, 2017, 02:48:47 PM

It selects different solvers for different cards even if the cards are the same? I have on one rig all EVGA 1070 and some cards use solver 0 and some solver 1. This is weird?

I dont see the speed difference, it is probably marginal

and thanks for the miner!

Yeah there is a bug, 5 card 1070, first and tries wrong solver and hash is 20% less on them

Especially for those cases you can select solver manually.

EWBF_

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 160

Quote from: Kompik on January 17, 2017, 02:48:47 PM

It selects different solvers for different cards even if the cards are the same? I have on one rig all EVGA 1070 and some cards use solver 0 and some solver 1. This is weird?

I dont see the speed difference, it is probably marginal

and thanks for the miner!

Yes it is normal for modern gpu, solvers 0 and 1 fastest and difference between this solvers very small. But i know about cases when solver 1 will be much faster. It depends on hardware and software os, drivers etc.

reb0rn21

legendary

Activity: 1901

Merit: 1024

Quote from: Kompik on January 17, 2017, 02:48:47 PM

It selects different solvers for different cards even if the cards are the same? I have on one rig all EVGA 1070 and some cards use solver 0 and some solver 1. This is weird?

I dont see the speed difference, it is probably marginal

and thanks for the miner!

Yeah there is a bug, 5 card 1070, first and tries wrong solver and hash is 20% less on them

m1n1ngP4d4w4n

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CryptoLearner

Quote from: EWBF_ on January 17, 2017, 02:28:16 PM

Version 0.2.0b released.

Ok new version is indeed on par, but no bugs, so good.

Would it be possible to indicate a logfile name for the log, because if you mine with multiple instances it's going into the same log. Thanks.

Kompik

sr. member

Activity: 463

Merit: 250

It selects different solvers for different cards even if the cards are the same? I have on one rig all EVGA 1070 and some cards use solver 0 and some solver 1. This is weird?

I dont see the speed difference, it is probably marginal

and thanks for the miner!

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

version 2.0 is like the last nicehahs version but without all the bug related to the cpu gpu loop

wacko

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1014

Hashrate looks the same with the new 0.2, I'm getting exactly identical sol/s with 1070s and 1060/3.

m1n1ngP4d4w4n

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CryptoLearner

Quote from: EWBF_ on January 17, 2017, 02:28:16 PM

Version 0.2.0b released.

Nice man, will give it a try right now ! Thx Grin

logging yayyyyyyyy, now API and you make me the happiest Grin

EWBF_

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 160

Version 0.2.0b released.

m1n1ngP4d4w4n

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CryptoLearner

Quote from: HavinnATime on January 17, 2017, 08:20:57 AM

Quote from: HavinnATime on January 16, 2017, 05:37:49 PM

I'm mining with a GTX-680M and am only getting 10-12Sol/s while my CPU is getting 15-18Sol/s, also read on here some one is getting 40-50Sol/s with a GTX-680, any idea why this is? Is there any tweaks I can try or a read me? Also getting alot of rejected shares, I'm currently using flypool. I've tried coinmine but same results.

Quote from: Velgelm on January 17, 2017, 01:11:57 AM

25 s/s ? dont waste your electricity and burn your cpu and vga card

This is why I'm looking for advise, the GPU is getting a lot of rejected shares. Is this due solo because of my card?

Mobile GPU = less hash than real card.
Lots of reject, either bad overclock or bad pool

HavinnATime

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote from: HavinnATime on January 16, 2017, 05:37:49 PM

I'm mining with a GTX-680M and am only getting 10-12Sol/s while my CPU is getting 15-18Sol/s, also read on here some one is getting 40-50Sol/s with a GTX-680, any idea why this is? Is there any tweaks I can try or a read me? Also getting alot of rejected shares, I'm currently using flypool. I've tried coinmine but same results.

Quote from: Velgelm on January 17, 2017, 01:11:57 AM

25 s/s ? dont waste your electricity and burn your cpu and vga card

This is why I'm looking for advise, the GPU is getting a lot of rejected shares. Is this due solo because of my card?

xPwnK

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Quote from: mrtrodonet on January 17, 2017, 04:01:34 AM

Quote from: EWBF_ on January 16, 2017, 09:49:29 AM

Quote from: giagge on January 16, 2017, 08:38:33 AM

EWBF any news for new version , maybe Version 0.1.1b or 0.2.0b ? Grin

.

Yes, new version soon...

EWBF Developer, why is your miner detected as Artemis trojan by my McAfee antivirus and Avast?

This question has already been answered many times here.

mrtrodonet

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: EWBF_ on January 16, 2017, 09:49:29 AM

Quote from: giagge on January 16, 2017, 08:38:33 AM

EWBF any news for new version , maybe Version 0.1.1b or 0.2.0b ? Grin

.

Yes, new version soon...

EWBF Developer, why is your miner detected as Artemis trojan by my McAfee antivirus and Avast?

Velgelm

sr. member

Activity: 299

Merit: 250

25 s/s ? dont waste your electricity and burn your cpu and vga card

HavinnATime

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

I'm mining with a GTX-680M and am only getting 10-12Sol/s while my CPU is getting 15-18Sol/s, also read on here some one is getting 40-50Sol/s with a GTX-680, any idea why this is? Is there any tweaks I can try or a read me? Also getting alot of rejected shares, I'm currently using flypool. I've tried coinmine but same results.

Zzsdr

newbie

Activity: 17

Merit: 0

This is the fastest nvidia zcash miner I've seen so far. Maybe a little bit unstable, but I hope it will be fixed in future releases.

More than 500 Sol/s on GTX1080, sometimes 520 depending on room temp and clocks (2000+/5100). I have 5 gpus of these, ASUS A8G with Micron memory.

I have 480H/s on Nicehash 1.7.3.12 with their latest equihash miner, but I am achieving it only on benchmark

(Very strange!!!) When mining with 5 gpus, I can achieve only 460-470, sometimes lower, whenever my cards are running at 2000 or 2080 clock speeds. In fact I saw 480 only twice since the version 1.7.3.12 was released. I made many tests with many settings, but when I start to play a lot, the things go even worse. I suppose nicehash devs didn't optimize their miner properly for gtx1080 or there is something in their service, but my other cards are just fine (970, 1070). I can't parse the extra parameters, maybe some bug in latest version. This is driving me crazy and I prefer to mine with this miner on Suprnova pool. That's it. Period!

Thank you for your effort and time Dev!

sublimus

full member

Activity: 240

Merit: 100

Quote from: Hangterisaan on January 16, 2017, 01:35:25 AM

How do you guys get these results? I have a gtx 1080 and a 1070. On nicehash i get an average of 1000 sol/s (on OC). With the same settings this miner gives me 600... I rebooted, checked for latest drivers, start gpu mining without other stuff running. Nothing helps.

1 x 970 + 1 x 1070 gives me 261+408=669H/s at the script level and 613 H/s on Flypool.

Your setup should give you at least 408+575=983H/s

Maybe a temp problem. My 1070 runs at 60c/60% fan. And the 970: 68c/85% fan
With the help of MSI Afterburner fan control.

Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 224. (Read 2164327 times)