Strix OC, MSI X, Gigabyte G1 (1070): all stock clocks EWBF = NH for me
might be true, because ewbf use a bit less of power and cards will/might boost more, my results were done on fixed frequency
Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 259. (Read 2164327 times)
might be true, because ewbf use a bit less of power and cards will/might boost more, my results were done on fixed frequency
Strix OC, MSI X, Gigabyte G1 (1070): all stock clocks EWBF = NH for me
might be true, because ewbf use a bit less of power and cards will/might boost more, my results were done on fixed frequency
Since I use it 5 blue screens, 10 freezes even at stock clocks.
Event lock messed with TST, GPC, ESR issues all over the bank..something is either wrong with the driver or the solver uses something erratically.
Event lock messed with TST, GPC, ESR issues all over the bank..something is either wrong with the driver or the solver uses something erratically.
Thanks for the update, getting up to 410 sols/s on 1070
Strix OC, MSI X, Gigabyte G1 (1070): all stock clocks EWBF = NH for me
might be true, because ewbf use a bit less of power and cards will/might boost more, my results were done on fixed frequency
Strix OC, MSI X, Gigabyte G1 (1070): all stock clocks EWBF = NH for me
works stable on linux for me.
Code:
GPU0: 384 Sol/s GPU1: 386 Sol/s GPU2: 387 Sol/s GPU3: 386 Sol/s GPU4: 384 Sol/s GPU5: 394 Sol/s
Total speed: 2321 Sol/s
very unstable for me though...can't run same clocks as earlier, and PCs reboot.
Yes this version is more stressing and unstable than before.
Try to lower the clock speeds. I found out sofar that my KFA² won't run stable anymore with the new EWBF ..dunno why because before she ran 3 days stable with these clocks.
very unstable for me though...can't run same clocks as earlier, and PCs reboot.
Nice Work EWBF !!!!
180 sol/s more !
2x gtx 1080
920 sol/s
180 sol/s more !
2x gtx 1080
920 sol/s
For me this miner is about 5-7% slower than nicehash on EVGA 1070, but still worth it.
its not if you run 2x exe then its ~4%
nicehash 420
ewbf ~400 but a bit less power usage
My GTX1070 are KFA² EX and Zotac GTx1070 Mini with Micron +150 Core +650 Mem
But it was a typo I meant 408 sol/s- was writing from my Smartphone over RDP :-/
Indeed solver needs fixing:
Sofar 1 Bluescreen
2 Crashes of driver
\Device\UVMLiteProcess2
Graphics Exception: ESR 0x51c648=0x30000e 0x51c650=0x0 0x51c644=0xd3eff2 0x51c64c=0x17f
and
\Device\UVMLiteProcess2
Graphics SM Warp Exception on (GPC 3, TPC 0): Out Of Range Address
Never saw such failures before - maybe some new addressing of Mem or opcode?
But it was a typo I meant 408 sol/s- was writing from my Smartphone over RDP :-/
Quote
Version 0.0.7b
Performance improvements. Old cards may be slower than with version 0.0.6b.
I wanted release it as fast as possible. So new solver can be less stable.
Performance improvements. Old cards may be slower than with version 0.0.6b.
I wanted release it as fast as possible. So new solver can be less stable.
Indeed solver needs fixing:
Sofar 1 Bluescreen
2 Crashes of driver
\Device\UVMLiteProcess2
Graphics Exception: ESR 0x51c648=0x30000e 0x51c650=0x0 0x51c644=0xd3eff2 0x51c64c=0x17f
and
\Device\UVMLiteProcess2
Graphics SM Warp Exception on (GPC 3, TPC 0): Out Of Range Address
Never saw such failures before - maybe some new addressing of Mem or opcode?
For me this miner is about 5-7% slower than nicehash on EVGA 1070, but still worth it.
smells fishy - no source code
moron really.Ewbf nice getting speed of 510 on GTX1080 and 480 on GTX1070 nice thx
My 1070s running a little above 400...
Version 0.0.7b released.
Right same as NH! Good move. Ewbf nice getting speed of 510 on GTX1080 and 480 on GTX1070 nice thx
480 on GTX 1070? Holy crap, what clocks are you at? I'm only getting about 360-370 with my 1070s. Are there any special settings with this miner, something one needs to add to the bat? smells fishy - no source code
moron really.Ewbf nice getting speed of 510 on GTX1080 and 408 on GTX1070 nice thx
smells fishy - no source code
Version 0.0.7b released.
Update please!! Now I am forced to use nicehash since it is more profitable with their new miner.. 
Jump to: