Pages:
Author

Topic: Exchange platform are why ieos have gone quiet - page 2. (Read 316 times)

hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 655
exchange platform charge a lot to list ieo projects for ieo

lol why do you think exchanges started this IEO nonsense in first place? it is exactly to get paid to list scam projects. the more scammy the project the less they care about that high cost!

Quote
If ico ieo sto and ito isn’t the way; how then can serious good projects conduct a crowdfunding to help their idea ??

all the fundraising schemes have always been to scam people. there is no even a single project that has run a fundraising and have been good. why do you think half the tokens died in a year and the other half is dying?
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 1029
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
When ieo started with binance, it roused other exchanges to kickstart the same
But recent discovery tell us that exchange platform charge a lot to list ieo projects for ieo

And also some exchanges conduct ghost ieo and list token to drive in investors only to exit

If ico ieo sto and ito isn’t the way; how then can serious good projects conduct a crowdfunding to help their idea ??
If that was having a real product and company to create IPO is not a bad idea, and this is the only way or last way probably.
As far as I know even some shitty exchange sites just like coineal and bitmax have charged more than 11 btc for an IEO that have already launched on that platform.

Remember to conduct an IPO is a tough thing consider you must legally register your company in official institutional to get legalisation.

The best choice to do ICO consider the team itself is holding the funds, but that's not a safe way to get the money anymore.
legendary
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
When ieo started with binance, it roused other exchanges to kickstart the same
But recent discovery tell us that exchange platform charge a lot to list ieo projects for ieo

And also some exchanges conduct ghost ieo and list token to drive in investors only to exit

If ico ieo sto and ito isn’t the way; how then can serious good projects conduct a crowdfunding to help their idea ??

crowdfunding IS the way, but like anything, it can be abused Sad
shittokens took advantage of the hype, that dosent mean GOOD projects can't use IEOs to get started tho Smiley
Many good projects, ETH for example used crowdfunding model and are successful to this day
one thing hasent changed: Don't invest what you can't afford to lose
hero member
Activity: 3038
Merit: 634
But recent discovery tell us that exchange platform charge a lot to list ieo projects for ieo
I don't think this was even a secret. During the ICO days, the exchanges were ramping and making more money with the listings from different projects so with the IEO, expect that it would also conduct the same charging fee especially if it's a known exchange such as Binance.

And also some exchanges conduct ghost ieo and list token to drive in investors only to exit
Projects that were made to scam also exists with IEO and this has been happening ever since the popularity of ICO.

If ico ieo sto and ito isn’t the way; how then can serious good projects conduct a crowdfunding to help their idea ??
Any of those, as long as they are serious they will be noticed in the long run.
hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 753
When ieo started with binance, it roused other exchanges to kickstart the same
But recent discovery tell us that exchange platform charge a lot to list ieo projects for ieo

And also some exchanges conduct ghost ieo and list token to drive in investors only to exit

If ico ieo sto and ito isn’t the way; how then can serious good projects conduct a crowdfunding to help their idea ??

I beg to differ.

Exchange platforms charging a high fee would not be an issue if there was even a fraction of the demand for these tokens when compared to the alt craze of 2017. Back then, listing fees were absolutely over the roof with barely any legitimate, non-hyped up project being able to afford it, yet it can still be financed due to the absurdly easy environment for getting investments.

And plus, people look at IEOs no differently than ICOs now, which is different to when it initially came out with the surprise factor.

At the end of the day, the ICO/IEO market is completely saturated with unwilling investors right now in a bearish environment. That's all there's to it.
hero member
Activity: 2688
Merit: 540
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
When ieo started with binance, it roused other exchanges to kickstart the same
But recent discovery tell us that exchange platform charge a lot to list ieo projects for ieo

And also some exchanges conduct ghost ieo and list token to drive in investors only to exit

If ico ieo sto and ito isn’t the way; how then can serious good projects conduct a crowdfunding to help their idea ??

We need to realize why the IEO ,ICO and other ways are failing ? Because all of them focus on getting the investments from the people and do not focus on the development. If a project team focus on the roadmap and deliver its key milestones right on time, the investors will come to them even if they are using ico , crowdfunding or private sales.
And most of the project started that crowdfunding only have idea , you invest for the idea that you dont even know if  it will be successful which i think reasons why many project failed. The project should have working product before starting an ICO,IEO it will not guaranteed your investment but at least you know they are really working.
Thats why they do ask out for some funding or financial support to build their working product thats why its just rare to see projects that
already had some product before they do ask out for more support.Majority or all of them are still on ideas thats why we do see roadmaps and whitepapers.
The only thing or mistake here is that when project owners already getting some support they already forget to built up the project or simply
forget the things they had promised to its investors when its still asking some funding.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1253
So anyway, I applied as a merit source :)
Serious investors dont use crypto to invest unless they are investing after being advised about the project. Where ever there is investment from venture capitalists there will be at lot of investigation from the capital owners. You think whatever initial coin blah blah blah is going to attract investors, No.

The project team and MVP is what is important. 99% of these projects are a waste of time and money so stop investing  in them. Its rare to find anything good to invest in except bitcoin which is the one and only thing that should be any crypto enthusiasts focus.
sr. member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 329
When ieo started with binance, it roused other exchanges to kickstart the same
But recent discovery tell us that exchange platform charge a lot to list ieo projects for ieo

And also some exchanges conduct ghost ieo and list token to drive in investors only to exit

If ico ieo sto and ito isn’t the way; how then can serious good projects conduct a crowdfunding to help their idea ??

We need to realize why the IEO ,ICO and other ways are failing ? Because all of them focus on getting the investments from the people and do not focus on the development. If a project team focus on the roadmap and deliver its key milestones right on time, the investors will come to them even if they are using ico , crowdfunding or private sales.
And most of the project started that crowdfunding only have idea , you invest for the idea that you dont even know if  it will be successful which i think reasons why many project failed. The project should have working product before starting an ICO,IEO it will not guaranteed your investment but at least you know they are really working.
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1172
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
When ieo started with binance, it roused other exchanges to kickstart the same
But recent discovery tell us that exchange platform charge a lot to list ieo projects for ieo

And also some exchanges conduct ghost ieo and list token to drive in investors only to exit

If ico ieo sto and ito isn’t the way; how then can serious good projects conduct a crowdfunding to help their idea ??

We need to realize why the IEO ,ICO and other ways are failing ? Because all of them focus on getting the investments from the people and do not focus on the development. If a project team focus on the roadmap and deliver its key milestones right on time, the investors will come to them even if they are using ico , crowdfunding or private sales.
sr. member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 329
When ieo started with binance, it roused other exchanges to kickstart the same
But recent discovery tell us that exchange platform charge a lot to list ieo projects for ieo

And also some exchanges conduct ghost ieo and list token to drive in investors only to exit

If ico ieo sto and ito isn’t the way; how then can serious good projects conduct a crowdfunding to help their idea ??
There are many investors now affraid in any crowdfunding in crypto there will be a new idea of crowdfunding but it will not last for long like what will happen in IEO, STO.
Its better for the project to start with private investors than make a crowdfunding.
jr. member
Activity: 250
Merit: 2
When ieo started with binance, it roused other exchanges to kickstart the same
But recent discovery tell us that exchange platform charge a lot to list ieo projects for ieo

And also some exchanges conduct ghost ieo and list token to drive in investors only to exit

If ico ieo sto and ito isn’t the way; how then can serious good projects conduct a crowdfunding to help their idea ??
Pages:
Jump to: