Topic: Expiry date for topics? (Read 461 times)

Another Pajeet Nagesh021 vs PEEMAN ( TMAN ) is seems like about to start with these two guys if they continue what they're doing. You should stop it guys, you're leading to a off-topic discussion. You two are messing up the thread, how about make a thread in reputation so then you guys can continue your personal quarrel.

OP, sorry for posting off-topic.

This gathering gives data to all novices who need to find out about bitcoin and so on. There's such a large number of old quality posts here that gives a considerable measure of data to beginners so giving an expiry date for a post is inappropriate.Besides the mods here are dynamic so at whatever point they see excess posts or unseemly answers, they take activities.

I am neither a native speaker and I don't need to   . You have corrected your mistakes but after calling them shitposters, can you take your words back ? . I am sure you are a time waster idiot for this forum and deserve only hell . You are after merit system, something created by other , you have no existence LOL .

Thanks for pointing out my grammatical mistakes (BTW I'm not an English native speaker). I can correct my mistakes in the post (I have already done that), but can you edit your trust wall? . You have chosen the decontextualized way of debating. You're not addressing the points what I have highlighted but my grammatical mistakes. You have earned 104 Merits 4 Merits (100 Airdropped) for your contribution to the forum. I think you deserved a lot more than that for your ICO shill bumping service contribution. Seems like I'm not the only one here that didn't feel what you are. LOL

"wether" , "I didn't agreed" ,  "When you're stop " and calling others shitposters   , I wonder what will happen to this forum next . Your grammar gave me a cancer . Well you can not feel what I am to this community as you have nothing to discuss . All you have got is only bogus stuffs to talk about .

If post giving wrong information, there is report button on bottom of post, just use it. Why need expiry date for locked or archived thread ? By default no one can reply on locked thread , so no question for bump. I mean locked thread slowly will go last page.

If you are thinking expiry date for all over thread than strongly disagree. If expiry date on all over thread than we will miss many useful post. I don't think all of your suggestion is useful.

Seems that you're complaining, if so then stop because you are not different from the others. You do the same thing as well .

Yeah! The struggle is real. Many new topics only having few replies are easily transcended by the megathreads and/or old spammy threads. Well, there's no concrete rule regarding this meaning you're not liable to any violation if you do this. But as a quality poster, much better if you will not get used to these stuffs simply because that was an unhealthy habit.

@For the guilty ones ~ I just  hope that they will understand what I'm talking about soon. Maybe they will as soon as they relized that doing these stuffs makes feel them not a human anymore. That you're like a robot — bored and lifeless.

I agree somehow but if it happened only because of human error and really don't have any bad intentions of spreading a hoax from the very beginning then that was considerable. Maybe advising him to do a revision or locking the thread are enough disciplinary actions already. (IMO)

Archiving can be a good idea, its there on reddit, and it could be a possible option that users could have, but then again most users don't even bother to lock the topics. I feel this isn't a big enough "issue" that needs to be prioritized on, but it is what it is. Your suggestion, even though it is a decent one unlike crappy "merit ruins lives" types of suggestions, is going to be ignored. Its sad, and its true.

I see this topic has already gone off-topic. Way to go fuckers.

Here comes the ICO shill bumper Coolwave again to ruin the discussion going on. When you're stop you stop your childish behaviour and your conspiracy theories about that you're not a scammer.

Actually, I didn't agreed agree with @hilariousetc regarding expiring thread concept. I think you are not reading any of the posts in this thread and just posting nonsense. This forum didn't want to reboot, but you are?

I don't care wether whether you're a scammer or not wether whether you're red tagged or not, but if you have nothing to add to the conversation it's better to avoid posting in a thread rather diverting the topic. I am delivering what I know and by sharing my thoughts regarding going on discussions, but are you? Everyone can see what you're are delivering to the forum when they looking at your trust wall.

---

Sorry @Pinkprint for posting off topic reply.

Just because you support his suggestions you were given two merits , congrats !  This forum needs a reboot & instead of discussing about so called "shitposters" you should focus on delivering what you know .

The merit system was introduced in order to minimize the amount of spam on the forum. Six months later we continue to face this problem and understand that just merits are not enough to eliminate the issue of shitposting. I like the merit system, I believe that it encourages forum participants to make great efforts and improve their knowledge in the crypto sphere. But we shouldn`t forget that this system is still only in the development stage. Many members of the forum became heroes and legendary before the introduction of the merit system. And therefore, I think it isn`t fair to single out participants only according to rank.

I believe that the merit system should not only maintain the existing system of ranks, but also qualitatively differ from it. After all, we can see that sometimes members of lower ranks receive more merits than heroes or legendary ones. Therefore, I believe that it is necessary to look first at the number of merits and the quality of posts, rather than on rank. In this regard, I fully agree with the fact that if participants want to earn money, they should do it correctly, through merits and activity. But merits are more important to me than activity, because they show how acknowledged and useful are your comments for other forum participants.

Even though necro posts aren't technically breaking any rules, in most cases the ones who are necro posting are ,like what you said, posting generic crap, and most of this threads that are necro bumped are most likely worthless and easy to answer threads that is why the spam will be a lot in a short span of time. I just hope that there is a system where old threads that died already are not bumped back up to the first page of the section, as this will also help you and the other mods on your work cleaning up the forum.

Well that would certainly solve all our problems once and for all with the farming, spam and shitposting, but as I've mentioned before though you'd also have to remove avatars and personal texts as well because people will still utilise them. People might even start advertising with their usernames. Bounty rules: Sign up to bitcointalk and create a username with 'shitcoinico' in and get paid to post. I think there are several other options we should consider first before removing signatures completely though and I've suggested them numerous times. One penultimate solution to removing them altogether would be to only allow signatures for very high ranks. Imagine if only Hero or Legendary users were the only people who could advertise here. That would certainly have a drastic effect on the spam and stop all the shitposters just signing up here just to shitpost because they would get nowhere and only the very top contributors would get anywhere. If you hadn't paid your dues here by gaining the required merit over time then you can't earn here. In addition and if that was too extreme, you could allow members to buy the signature with Silver/Gold ranks, but only if they're sufficiently expensive as to stop people from just buying them on their dozens to hundreds of accounts (something in the range of $100-1000 would be ideal). Farmers really would be priced out of the market because it just wouldn't be financially viable to spend so much on each one and most users would be limited to one or a few accounts at most. Nobody would be penalised from posting here in the process as well but if you want to earn here then either earn that right through merit and activity or cough up for a Gold/Silver rank.


Yeah, those are really annoying. They usually bump threads just to post some generic crap in and within a matter of hours there can be pages of spam to remove and it's incredibly tedious to do so.

If reported they are usually deleted. Unless, they are offering something new to the discussion, and it wasn't worth opening a new thread about. Otherwise, the initial necrobump, and the replies that follow are usually removed. I don't tend to have too many reports about necro bumps though. Only a few a day.

What concerns me the most is necro bumping on threads, these threads that died down from 3 or more months (or even years) are brought back to life because of this low ranked members randomly reading the title thread and then try to make a post in it. These threads will of course be put back in the first page of the section and a chain of members will follow and try to post some more spam in that old thread. I just wish there is a feature where threads (on certain sections) that didn't receive any new post for a given period of time will not be eligible to be bump in the first page anymore.

No it isn't. One week is enough only for threads starting in B&H board where most of the users normally asks dumb questions without searching anything at all wether that question asked and given answers several times. But for other boards where we start threads specially suggestions shouldn't enough one week. Those needs to be continued until it discussed all the aspects and all the scenarios that can be happened.

I really support most of your suggestions which will surely leads to make a better forum where we all can discuss and share knowledge about crypto field without having less spammers or shitposters. But not this one, we can't put expiry date for all the threads, to just stop the creation of redundend threads by spammers who cares only the number of posts to full fill there shitty campaigns. That will be a annoying factor for true members who really thinks about better conversation with other members (not spammers).

More viable option that I think as you already suggested is putting a barrier of 1Merit requirement for become Jr. Members. Why we are allowing to rank up newbies to Jr. Member just by wasting time with shitpost or oneline replies, but not contributing anything for the forum or other members. If we put that barrier, I'm pretty sure most of the spammers will not join bitcointalk or leave the forum since they couldn't ranked up easily and cannot join for bounties or signature campaigns to earn money. Less money, less spam.

Exactly. We already know the core root of the problem, and anything else we implement isn't going to help, and just create extra workload. Theymos listed a few of the solutions which he may consider the other day, and it'll be interesting to see what is implemented to prevent these issues that we continue to have. I'm getting to the point where I don't even care if signature campaigns were just outright removed. 

Sure. You or anyone else is free to create such a thread if you wanted. Nothing stopping you. No guarantees that it will be enforced though but people can chip in whether they think a thread has outlived its purpose.


One week is too short. Setting some sort of automatic expiry would just lead to too many issues and closing threads that people still find useful. Users would likely then just open a v.2 version of it anyway.  A much better fix is to tackle the issue at the source of the problem which is crap campaigns that are paying people to make the spam in the first place. Punish that and spam will stop or at the very least lower.

It isn't food that will be spoiled and I guess it is good for those topics that will be open again (unless it isn't lock), topics that will be good for other to be reviewed or topics that might be searched one day and maybe the searcher may find interest if he/she finds it.

I think the best solution would be to set a default time of expiry for every thread created. OP would still have the option to re-open the thread if needed, otherwise it should remain closed.

If we were to talk about expiry times, I think 1 week would be good enough.

Going back to reality, although this is a good idea/feature, I don't think this will be implemented (if ever)