I also laughed so hard as I saw that, how can they say telegram succeeded where bitcoin failed, telegram is not a fully decentralized platform, I can say it is more anonymous than most of the social media but I can vouch for the case of decentralization.
I personally have seen the telegram servers go down a lot of times which is something that is just not possible for a system that is fully decentralized. Most people just give information without proper research.
Topic: Facebook and Telegram succeed up where Bitcoin Failed? - page 2. (Read 230 times)
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/28/technology/cryptocurrency-facebook-telegram.html#click=https://t.co/dafMzFxBWE
Did anyone read this article in the NYtimes today? I personally had a good laugh because I would love to know how they are going to achieve a truly decentralized cryptocurrency. I could see them incorporating an incentivization system into their platforms but not create a truly decentralized crypto. The only 'stable' coin project that I am aware that is decentralized and is said to succeed where Bitcoin hasn't is Ampleforth due to their elastic supply protocol. Are there any others?
Did anyone read this article in the NYtimes today? I personally had a good laugh because I would love to know how they are going to achieve a truly decentralized cryptocurrency. I could see them incorporating an incentivization system into their platforms but not create a truly decentralized crypto. The only 'stable' coin project that I am aware that is decentralized and is said to succeed where Bitcoin hasn't is Ampleforth due to their elastic supply protocol. Are there any others?
Jump to: