Topic: "Fake Bills In Circulation" (Read 1174 times)

@Bill

I didn't tag you because you have alt accounts, I don't see you cheated sig. I tagged you because you are account buyer and liar....latest discovery, judging neutral feedbacks you have on EthanB account, trust farmer. I didn't made these connections - someone else did. I posted them. Don't blame me for people being scared to post things about you because of recent events with sensitive PM.

@CH
You are lying.

And what is this lie with video evidence you are shitting around forum? Are you unable to read that post? Where did I say it isn't my account?

Stop spamming lies and shitposting.

That's fair, you're entitled to your opinion, but I don't believe that your trust feedback is appropriate nor consistent. The poster directly below yours fits the criteria for which you've left me negative trust, but you have failed to leave them negative trust.


You're not the only person doing this, and I wouldn't call you stupid for doing so; you'd be wrong, but wrong and stupid are different things.


What I've been saying isn't a fairy-tale that I've concocted, but I understand if you are weary of previous omission.
I just wouldn't distrust the things I am saying, because of the things I didn't say.


Which truth has been very far from what I'm saying? I'm being open.


That would be much easier to do than you're making it, if that was your goal.


There's differences in every case, if you want to play this "better or worse" game, at least I wasn't involving myself in the account sale(s) of a legendary account with trust associated with it. Selling your reputation is much more devious, you're right we don't fall in the same category; you are sitting in a much dirtier boat.

Now let's act like you disagree with that, I know you do, so do you think those differences are relevant in terms of feedback like this? :


That one is on there twice ^


Here's another one from the guy that posted directly above you.


Does their feedback not apply to your situation because you were unsuccessful?


No. I'll say that the amount of tags, and the profound hypocrisy of some of them is surprising, though.


"Should be", as if to say I am not thankful for a busy man to take time out of their life to look into this stupid shit. The first thing I did was say "Thank you" to theymos.

I was honestly trying to remove myself from the drama.

Bill, the difference between you and me is you bought your account, and I didn't. We do not fall in the same category there.

Did you honestly believe nobody was going to tag you the moment you said you bought your account? Really you should be thankful for being the recipient of a special theymos intervention that has apparently allowed you to remain in your signature campaign.

Theymos' decision is the first of its kind I've ever seen, so consider yourself lucky to be part of special treatment enjoyed by less that 0.1% of the forum.

Well, it's not about conspiracy.
It's just about having a very very hard time to believe what you post.
About your former DT1 position, I have excluded you from my trust list because after shedding light on some events, I don't trust your judgement and actions anymore and believe you are not DT material.

This is maybe stupid, but when I read one of your latest posts, I unconsciously apply negation to it and tend to stick to this version.
I do not share my thoughts because I know that there is nothing backing them, but its been a lot of things discovered these last days !!
I'm expecting, what else will come out ?

So many things have been dig up that if there is some truth somewhere, it is very far of what you say.
If by any chance you tell the truth, you need to understand that facts make it very hard to take your words seriously.

Once bitten, twice shy.

Allow me to politely say that you are incorrect. Innocuous things happen daily that you will not remember down the road.


I find it so strange when people talk about things they have no idea about.
The "original owner" and the "professional account seller" are the same person.


If you want the honest answer, 0, but I'm sure you would rather formulate a wild conspiracy.


TMAN, for old-times sake would you be willing to describe who I am in your head? I'd like to know how deep you think the rabbit hole goes.


The problem is that almost every single person that has tagged me for buying bill gator have refused to tag nutildah (you) for attempting to sell a legendary account, with trust long after my "offense". They are refusing to treat iluvbitcoins case, blazed, even marlboroza's with the same principles. These "others" feel however is most convenient and try to wrap it up in concepts they will throwaway and belittle when the next situation arises.

Without having a consistent criteria for tagging these accounts we'll just keep running in circles of no accountability until the hypocrisy is even more egregious.  
If the rule was that anyone involved in account buying/selling ever is to be tagged by at least half a dozen DT, then I wouldn't have anything to say.

LOL I will keep handing you shovels. Keep smashing through that hard layer of rocks  hahah

Look Notildah. Let me explain it to you again.

There is a GIANT difference when you are talking about TRUST. It comes down to intent. That is the most important thing here with account sales.

This post (if it is true) looks even worse on your part.

So here you are https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50719875

a/ fully convinced that people should have red trust for selling their account because it facilitates scamming
b/ going as far as calling people EVIL that sell their accounts, going to make a list of EVIL people were you who sold their accounts.

So not only are you fully intending to facilitate scamming, you are knowingly acting in an evil manner.

Also you are now saying you never stopped wanting to facilitate scams or being evil IT WAS ONLY YOU COULD NOT FIND A BUYER?

So you didn't even have a change of heart ? you just could not dupe anyone into buying your crappy account haha

Bill gator on the other hand likely never intended to facilitate or scam or be EVIL at all.  Who would I trust more knowing the different intentions here??  That is the GIANT difference.

Also are you now telling us you were given MILLIONS of dollars as a NEM stake holder and now need to beg for 0.02BTC loans recently?? what happen you EVIL bastard? child sacrifices not coming cheap these days or something lol  ? so a NEM stake holder and holding a bag of dash before and NOW are flat out broke begging for btc dust loans??  who says being evil does not pay lol.  Or did nutildah not include those in the account sale to some broke bum that spent out his only 0.3btc buying that damaged account. He booby trapped it with anti account sales posts before unloading it ...evil bastard.

EVIL, scam facilitating loser.

Not that I have too much higher opinion of bill anyway. He only cares about this "red trust abuse" now he got painted red. Unlike a true legend that defends others and noobs that were getting picked on that had nothing to do with him. Piece of dirt was siding against the true legend and now it has come fully circle on him. Too bad.

Fake Notildahs in circulation does not have the same ring to it though for sure.

Moronbozo was called a gutter rat sig spammer by U2 when he busted him sig spamming from his zorrobeck account anyway, so not entirely sure why he now is worried how many accounts bill gator has. I don't think ANY of them should be in a position of trust.  

Again, all we have is your word. There is literally no way for you to prove you haven't transferred your account. This has nothing to do with a grudge, this is a simple fact. If your account had been sold, the new owner would have plenty of incentive to cover up this fact and would want to pretend the transfer never happened now wouldn't they? You trying to sell it under your own name was just dumb, not proof of innocence. This is all besides the point anyway, the point being you get a pass because you suck all the right dicks, Bill Gator slaps the dicks away and he gets red marks.

But the general standard is Account buyers/sellers are not to be trusted.
Wondering how the hell it is different in your case.
Though I'm not going to digging much now, I know you still are an account trader.

1. So? Bill Gator openly admitted he bought the account himself, he wasn't caught doing something shady by a 3rd party.
2. Yes, and we are forced to take your word for this aren't we?
3. See number 2.

Your "proof" is nothing of the sort. If in fact your account was sold there is absolutely no reason all of this additional information could not be transferred along with it. I see, forgiveness for thee, but not for Bill Gator in this case eh? Thanks for demonstrating the hypocrisy of tagging Bill and not you even more completely. Keep that brown on your nose, its good luck.

The wordsmith multi accounter, with his style and passion for writing it does make me wonder how many other accounts he has enrolled in campaigns. If he is retired I imagine he is making a decent side income with 20+ accounts earning 0.3BTC plus a week.

I feel when you do not know the "exact events"  then it means you are hiding some events. In normal scenario any user can/will be tagged for confessing account buying. You are not victim here but those guys are fortunate who are not tagged despite of selling/buying account.

Who thought up that thread title for moronbozo. No way he came up with something like that by himself.

Remember though MB to tie 2 accounts together conclusively you require video evidence like yours and zorrobek ... anything less is speculation.

Is it just me or Bitcoin Supremo is extremely excited by this thread, especially when Ethan B was mentioned?
Eh, it is probably in my mind. 

I actually have but I can't. Previous post was already constructive enough.

Seems the gay marlboroza don't like when the truth is exposed against him and his friends , you fucking little disgusting piece of shit. Stfu if you have nothing constructive to say you little dickhead.

Seems Miss. Bitcoin Supremo can't stay on topic.

@mightyDT's should we all create as much as we can sockpuppets to make our opinion sound stronger? Please. You are smarter than that.

---

---

First of all, credit to this finding goes to person who doesn't want to reveal themselves. Well, I can't blame them, Bill likes to share sensitive PM info.

This is wallet https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/20a5013688c97d83/addresses

Addresses which are part of this wallet:

Fake Bill posted this:


Here:

EthanB posted this:

And signed message from this address:

Why EthanB assumed address is compromised?


Where is Bill Gator to explain why probably Fake EthanB thinks that?

May be you have failed to see the good side my friend.

And ironically they would all be able to articulate an argument better than you have done!

It's not explainable to a brainless animal.

You don't even know which one is you.
FYI none of these has brain by the way.

edit:

---

Has anyone notice the custom title? Is she back to staff or this kind of position to have her own custom title?
https://i.imgur.com/FGFBWmD.png

I have been speaking out about this kind of behavior for a long time. They have actively been harassing me for years and use any opportunity to take retribution for my insolence of speaking out about them. The only reason this has become so openly discussed now is because they increasingly get more extreme and blatant about their abusive behavior as time passes and their victims begin collecting and speaking out.

Are you saying you are TECHSHARE or is your brain just damaged?