Faster and Autonomous Large Bitcoin Collider fork - page 2.

anunnaki1202

jr. member

Activity: 78

Merit: 1

same error

Code:

anunnaki@anunnaki-PowerEdge-R810:~/vanitygen$ ./oclvanitygen -D 1:1 -f addresses.txt -o found.txt -k lastkey.txt 5KHon4xmV31t9dFSHzeN3KF3R1EvjnSRCuy5ZcVEL83NZXzsyeE
Start with 5KHon4xmV31t9dFSHzeN3KF3R1EvjnSRCuy5ZcVEL83NZXzsyeE
Searching for 200000 addresses
/dev/dri/card0 not authenticated
cant get_platform(1)
Can't get_opencl_device
Could not open device '1:1', ignoring
Available OpenCL platforms:
0: [Intel] Intel Gen OCL Driver
/dev/dri/card0 not authenticated
beignet-opencl-icd: no supported GPU found, this is probably the wrong opencl-icd package for this hardware
(If you have multiple ICDs installed and OpenCL works, you can ignore this message)
clGetDeviceIDs(0): CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND
anunnaki@anunnaki-PowerEdge-R810:~/vanitygen$

Andzhig

jr. member

Activity: 183

Merit: 3

Quote from: anunnaki1202 on November 14, 2018, 05:56:28 PM

Can oclvanitygen run on CPU I have a server with 48 threads and getting this error

Try -D 1:1

GoldTiger69

hero member

Activity: 582

Merit: 502

Quote from: anunnaki1202 on November 14, 2018, 08:19:41 PM

How to do that ?
To just removing ocl?

Nope, oclvanitygen and vanitygen are 2 different programs. Read the following thread, you will understand what I'm saying: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vanitygen-vanity-bitcoin-address-generatorminer-v022-25804

anunnaki1202

jr. member

Activity: 78

Merit: 1

How to do that ?
To just removing ocl?

GoldTiger69

hero member

Activity: 582

Merit: 502

Quote from: anunnaki1202 on November 14, 2018, 07:36:49 PM

I got it run as far as below

Code:

anunnaki@anunnaki-PowerEdge-R810:~/vanitygen$ sudo ./oclvanitygen -D 0:2 -f addresses.txt -o found.txt -k lastkey.txt 5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3DyuZSxCy1DYd7f5wZAZseJkjZqLb1rDeBo
Start with 5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3DyuZSxCy1DYd7f5wZAZseJkjZqLb1rDeBo
Searching for 200000 addresses
DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_APERTURE failed: Invalid argument
Assuming 131072kB available aperture size.
May lead to reduced performance or incorrect rendering.
get chip id failed: -1 [22]
param: 4, val: 0
DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_APERTURE failed: Invalid argument
Assuming 131072kB available aperture size.
May lead to reduced performance or incorrect rendering.
get chip id failed: -1 [22]
param: 4, val: 0
beignet-opencl-icd: no supported GPU found, this is probably the wrong opencl-icd package for this hardware
(If you have multiple ICDs installed and OpenCL works, you can ignore this message)
clGetDeviceIDs(0): CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND
can't get_device_list
cant get_device(2)
cant get_platform(0)
Can't get_opencl_device
Could not open device '0:2', ignoring
Available OpenCL platforms:
0: [Intel] Intel Gen OCL Driver
DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_APERTURE failed: Invalid argument
Assuming 131072kB available aperture size.
May lead to reduced performance or incorrect rendering.
get chip id failed: -1 [22]
param: 4, val: 0
beignet-opencl-icd: no supported GPU found, this is probably the wrong opencl-icd package for this hardware
(If you have multiple ICDs installed and OpenCL works, you can ignore this message)
clGetDeviceIDs(0): CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND
anunnaki@anunnaki-PowerEdge-R810:~/vanitygen$

This error is on Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Intel® Xeon(R) CPU E7540 @ 2.00GHz × 48

What am trying to achieve is to make it run on CPU

oclvanitygen is for GPUs. For CPU you need to use Vanitygen.

anunnaki1202

jr. member

Activity: 78

Merit: 1

I got it run as far as below

Code:

anunnaki@anunnaki-PowerEdge-R810:~/vanitygen$ sudo ./oclvanitygen -D 0:2 -f addresses.txt -o found.txt -k lastkey.txt 5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3DyuZSxCy1DYd7f5wZAZseJkjZqLb1rDeBo
Start with 5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3DyuZSxCy1DYd7f5wZAZseJkjZqLb1rDeBo
Searching for 200000 addresses
DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_APERTURE failed: Invalid argument
Assuming 131072kB available aperture size.
May lead to reduced performance or incorrect rendering.
get chip id failed: -1 [22]
param: 4, val: 0
DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_APERTURE failed: Invalid argument
Assuming 131072kB available aperture size.
May lead to reduced performance or incorrect rendering.
get chip id failed: -1 [22]
param: 4, val: 0
beignet-opencl-icd: no supported GPU found, this is probably the wrong opencl-icd package for this hardware
(If you have multiple ICDs installed and OpenCL works, you can ignore this message)
clGetDeviceIDs(0): CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND
can't get_device_list
cant get_device(2)
cant get_platform(0)
Can't get_opencl_device
Could not open device '0:2', ignoring
Available OpenCL platforms:
0: [Intel] Intel Gen OCL Driver
DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_APERTURE failed: Invalid argument
Assuming 131072kB available aperture size.
May lead to reduced performance or incorrect rendering.
get chip id failed: -1 [22]
param: 4, val: 0
beignet-opencl-icd: no supported GPU found, this is probably the wrong opencl-icd package for this hardware
(If you have multiple ICDs installed and OpenCL works, you can ignore this message)
clGetDeviceIDs(0): CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND
anunnaki@anunnaki-PowerEdge-R810:~/vanitygen$

This error is on Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Intel® Xeon(R) CPU E7540 @ 2.00GHz × 48

What am trying to achieve is to make it run on CPU

anunnaki1202

jr. member

Activity: 78

Merit: 1

Can oclvanitygen run on CPU I have a server with 48 threads and getting this error

Code:

anunnaki@anunnaki-PowerEdge-R810:~/vanitygen$ chmod 777 oclvanitygen
anunnaki@anunnaki-PowerEdge-R810:~/vanitygen$ ./oclvanitygen -D 0:0 -f addresses.txt -o found.txt -k lastkey.txt 5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3CSu63k8DbpvD8s5ip4nEB3kEsreAnchuDf
Start with 5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3CSu63k8DbpvD8s5ip4nEB3kEsreAnchuDf
Searching for 200000 addresses
clGetPlatformIDs(0): Unknown code -1001
cant get_platform(0)
Can't get_opencl_device
Could not open device '0:0', ignoring
clGetPlatformIDs(0): Unknown code -1001
Available OpenCL platforms:
anunnaki@anunnaki-PowerEdge-R810:~/vanitygen$ make oclvanitygen
make: 'oclvanitygen' is up to date.
anunnaki@anunnaki-PowerEdge-R810:~/vanitygen$

fucilator_3000

member

Activity: 154

Merit: 27

Quote from: arulbero on September 22, 2018, 04:27:10 PM

Quote from: domozhirov on September 22, 2018, 03:11:27 PM

arulbero, can you send your script or the source code of the program with baby-giant step? I'm not a programmer, I'm just a system administrator, but I have a test server with xeon and 1tb ram. I think that 1tb is enough to compose a hash for about 2 ^ 110. And if my assumptions are correct, then I can search the keys from 2 ^ 160-2 ^ 220

1 TB is only 2^5 times 32 GB (the Ram of my laptop). You could search maybe until 2^80, probably less, I have a Xeon too.

I wrote that program for myself, it is "unusable" at the moment (too hard to configure, no comments) for anybody but the author (me).

Keep us posted dude! Cheesy

DevilOper

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 26

Quote from: holy_ship on September 09, 2018, 10:55:07 PM

Theoretically CUDA doesn't have noticeable advantage over OPENCL.

It has inline assembler though.

arulbero

legendary

Activity: 1915

Merit: 2074

Quote from: domozhirov on September 22, 2018, 03:11:27 PM

arulbero, can you send your script or the source code of the program with baby-giant step? I'm not a programmer, I'm just a system administrator, but I have a test server with xeon and 1tb ram. I think that 1tb is enough to compose a hash for about 2 ^ 110. And if my assumptions are correct, then I can search the keys from 2 ^ 160-2 ^ 220

1 TB is only 2^5 times 32 GB (the Ram of my laptop). You could search maybe until 2^80, probably less, I have a Xeon too.

I wrote that program for myself, it is "unusable" at the moment (too hard to configure, no comments) for anybody but the author (me).

domozhirov

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

arulbero, can you send your script or the source code of the program with baby-giant step? I'm not a programmer, I'm just a system administrator, but I have a test server with xeon and 1tb ram. I think that 1tb is enough to compose a hash for about 2 ^ 110. And if my assumptions are correct, then I can search the keys from 2 ^ 160-2 ^ 220

arulbero

legendary

Activity: 1915

Merit: 2074

Quote from: holy_ship on September 17, 2018, 10:23:53 PM

Arulbero's magic proggie can calculate PK of spent puzzle56 because 2^55 - 2^56 is relatively small range.

puzzle161 is spent, but the range 2^161 - 2^162 is 40564819207303340847894502572032 times larger

I can search a private key in a 2^70 range, not much more. It takes a lot of memory and cpu power.

holy_ship

jr. member

Activity: 111

Merit: 1

Arulbero's magic proggie can calculate PK of spent puzzle56 because 2^55 - 2^56 is relatively small range.

puzzle161 is spent, but the range 2^161 - 2^162 is 40564819207303340847894502572032 times larger

>Vanitygen's main purpose if for creating personalized address, not to bruteforce private keys.

nc50lc, you should read at least first page before commenting in topic.

arulbero

legendary

Activity: 1915

Merit: 2074

Quote from: Amnuazka on September 16, 2018, 05:48:03 PM

Can someone show me the pk no 161 - 256 ?

Private keys? It's not possible. Only the transaction's author know them.

nc50lc

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 5531

Self-proclaimed Genius

Quote from: holy_ship on September 17, 2018, 12:43:42 AM

RIP LBC, RIP vanitygen Grin

Vanitygen's main purpose if for creating personalized address, not to bruteforce private keys.

But I second this: RIP LBC 'after 104 more addresses'.
It's been dead for a long time though, there are only few users left who's actually "adding" a share (for the Puzzle).
Most are just brought there by curiosity and false hope.

holy_ship

jr. member

Activity: 111

Merit: 1

Tested BitCrack a bit. Seems to work and around 2 times faster then NDV fork.

For my list of 97k wallets with gtx1070 I get 80MK, not 40.
And CPU is not used at all, not even 1 core.

This probably makes NDV fork useless as well.

RIP LBC, RIP vanitygen Grin

Amnuazka

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Congratulations!

Can someone show me the pk no 161 - 256 ?

Thx

@holy_ship
@Andzhig
@Arulbero
@BurtW

holy_ship

jr. member

Activity: 111

Merit: 1

Quote from: Elliptic23 on September 08, 2018, 12:08:43 PM

There is another project BitCrack that does the same thing and some people are getting 440 million keys per second on a GTX 1080. Why is it so much faster than VanityGen??

So? Did you test puzzle56? Is it really working? Grin

holy_ship

jr. member

Activity: 111

Merit: 1

Quote from: giftseller8x on September 09, 2018, 11:48:13 PM

Vanitygen Plus has been reported not fully using all Vga when run multiple card (6 cards).
Do you test vg from ndv with 6 cards, is the hash rate is sum of 6 cards.

Tried 2 cards.

If you have 6 CPU cores, it will probably SUM performance fine.

holy_ship

jr. member

Activity: 111

Merit: 1

Quote from: rico666

...

you're not only shitcoin crupto guru, but also a negotiations guru. Grin

OK, let it be - replaced "fork" for "upgrade" in title. Grin

At your age you should start taking nootropics, because you've read the performance comparisons, but still cannot commit in memory. maybe no free space in brain, heh?

Topic: Faster and Autonomous Large Bitcoin Collider fork - page 2. (Read 6723 times)