Pages:
Author

Topic: FBI Seizes DPR's personal coins! 144,000 coins! - page 2. (Read 9328 times)

legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
Was Silk Road seriously that bloody profitable? Or should we also suspect some of this BTC is from the Bitfloor (24k), Slush (3k), Bitcoinica (43k), bitomat.pl (17k), et al., thefts?
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
why did they move them in 324btc chunks ?

Seems they know how to launder BTC  Cheesy
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 110
I don't see anything that proves they actually have cracked any encryption. For all we know they just have a wallet.dat file with no key.

They couldn't move the coins without the key. And they obviously did move...Anyways here is the official FBI press release from Friday. Straight from their site:

http://www.fbi.gov/newyork/press-releases/2013/manhattan-u.s.-attorney-announces-seizure-of-additional-28-million-worth-of-bitcoins-belonging-to-ross-william-ulbricht-alleged-owner-and-operator-of-silk-road-website
Where is the proof they moved coins? I haven't seen any. They just said they seized it, just like they said that they had seized his 600,000 BTC. They could just be talking about possessing a wallet.dat. They also could have asked Ulbricht for the key as part of working on a plea deal. If you have some info that demonstrates that they actually have full control over the 100,000+ BTC and have moved them to a different address then please show me, cause I haven't seen it. Maybe that info is there, I just haven't seen it. We know they have the 26,000 BTC on that other address.

The quote above says they recovered a wallet. So maybe it wasn't even encrypted. The point being that they didn't figure out that Ulbricht had an address and then cracked the encryption. Ulbricht may not have even really tried to protect these coins.
https://blockchain.info/address/1FfmbHfnpaZjKFvyi1okTjJJusN455paPH?offset=400&filter=0
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
I don't see anything that proves they actually have cracked any encryption. For all we know they just have a wallet.dat file with no key.

They couldn't move the coins without the key. And they obviously did move...Anyways here is the official FBI press release from Friday. Straight from their site:

http://www.fbi.gov/newyork/press-releases/2013/manhattan-u.s.-attorney-announces-seizure-of-additional-28-million-worth-of-bitcoins-belonging-to-ross-william-ulbricht-alleged-owner-and-operator-of-silk-road-website
Where is the proof they moved coins? I haven't seen any. They just said they seized it, just like they said that they had seized his 600,000 BTC. They could just be talking about possessing a wallet.dat. They also could have asked Ulbricht for the key as part of working on a plea deal. If you have some info that demonstrates that they actually have full control over the 100,000+ BTC and have moved them to a different address then please show me, cause I haven't seen it. Maybe that info is there, I just haven't seen it. We know they have the 26,000 BTC on that other address.

The quote above says they recovered a wallet. So maybe it wasn't even encrypted. The point being that they didn't figure out that Ulbricht had an address and then cracked the encryption. Ulbricht may not have even really tried to protect these coins.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 504
From the U.S. Attorney’s Office announcement:
https://www.fbi.gov/newyork/press-releases/2013/manhattan-u.s.-attorney-announces-seizure-of-additional-28-million-worth-of-bitcoins-belonging-to-ross-william-ulbricht-alleged-owner-and-operator-of-silk-road-website

Quote
ULBRICHT’s residence was also searched on October 1, 2013, pursuant to a search warrant, and federal law enforcement agents conducting that search found several pieces of computer hardware belonging to ULBRICHT (collectively, along with ULBRICHT’s laptop, the “computer hardware”).  Through forensic analysis of the computer hardware, federal law enforcement agents recovered a Bitcoin wallet containing approximately 144,336 Bitcoins.

Flash drives?


Probably. Obviously Ulbricht's security measures weren't very strong. By default I would think any wallets would at least be encrypted with a unique key...that's pretty much "protect your btc 101"

It took ~3 weeks to transfer the coins if they were confiscated on October 1st. Probably not enough to break any encryption even with a weaker password. Means they probably got the password from someplace else he used it. I wonder what else uses that key...
legendary
Activity: 905
Merit: 1000
From the U.S. Attorney’s Office announcement:
https://www.fbi.gov/newyork/press-releases/2013/manhattan-u.s.-attorney-announces-seizure-of-additional-28-million-worth-of-bitcoins-belonging-to-ross-william-ulbricht-alleged-owner-and-operator-of-silk-road-website

Quote
ULBRICHT’s residence was also searched on October 1, 2013, pursuant to a search warrant, and federal law enforcement agents conducting that search found several pieces of computer hardware belonging to ULBRICHT (collectively, along with ULBRICHT’s laptop, the “computer hardware”).  Through forensic analysis of the computer hardware, federal law enforcement agents recovered a Bitcoin wallet containing approximately 144,336 Bitcoins.

Flash drives?
full member
Activity: 125
Merit: 101
It's a fail on his part and now that amount could crash the price.

Actually, by having the coins locked up for who knows how long, it increases the exchange rate. When Bitcoin becomes mainstream, it shouldn't have that much of an effect when they're finally liquidated.

Why not much effect?

When "bitcoin goes mainstream" 50M today may be 5B

Percentage on seizure was about 1% of total coins, and should have about the same relative effect to the price if they are abruptly liquidated, regardless what the exchange rate is, (as long as bitcoin's monetary stock is very much smaller than dollar's).

if they liquidate them in a few years, millions more will have been mined by then
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
It's a fail on his part and now that amount could crash the price.

Actually, by having the coins locked up for who knows how long, it increases the exchange rate. When Bitcoin becomes mainstream, it shouldn't have that much of an effect when they're finally liquidated.

Why not much effect?

When "bitcoin goes mainstream" 50M today may be 5B

Percentage on seizure was about 1% of total coins, and should have about the same relative effect to the price if they are abruptly liquidated, regardless what the exchange rate is, (as long as bitcoin's monetary stock is very much smaller than dollar's).
Exactly Smiley
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
It's a fail on his part and now that amount could crash the price.

Actually, by having the coins locked up for who knows how long, it increases the exchange rate. When Bitcoin becomes mainstream, it shouldn't have that much of an effect when they're finally liquidated.

Why not much effect?

When "bitcoin goes mainstream" 50M today may be 5B

Percentage on seizure was about 1% of total coins, and should have about the same relative effect to the price if they are abruptly liquidated, regardless what the exchange rate is, (as long as bitcoin's monetary stock is very much smaller than dollar's).
full member
Activity: 128
Merit: 103
why did they move them in 324btc chunks ?
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
It's a fail on his part and now that amount could crash the price.

Actually, by having the coins locked up for who knows how long, it increases the exchange rate. When Bitcoin becomes mainstream, it shouldn't have that much of an effect when they're finally liquidated.

Why not much effect?

When "bitcoin goes mainstream" 50M today may be 5B
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
What doesn't kill you only makes you sicker!
Well that's certainly a nice take for them.  What a profitable venture that was.

Yeah no kidding...170k BTC already in hand from the SR seizure? That's about 1.5% of all BTC in existence from just one court case. Imagine Seizing 1.5% of all USD in circulation lol.

It's more like seizing 1.5% of a very small country's currency.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 504
Well that's certainly a nice take for them.  What a profitable venture that was.

Yeah no kidding...170k BTC already in hand from the SR seizure? That's about 1.5% of all BTC in existence from just one court case. Imagine Seizing 1.5% of all USD in circulation lol.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Changing avatars is currently not possible.
Well that's certainly a nice take for them.  What a profitable venture that was.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 504
I don't see anything that proves they actually have cracked any encryption. For all we know they just have a wallet.dat file with no key.

They couldn't move the coins without the key. And they obviously did move...Anyways here is the official FBI press release from Friday. Straight from their site:

http://www.fbi.gov/newyork/press-releases/2013/manhattan-u.s.-attorney-announces-seizure-of-additional-28-million-worth-of-bitcoins-belonging-to-ross-william-ulbricht-alleged-owner-and-operator-of-silk-road-website
full member
Activity: 125
Merit: 101
I don't see anything that proves they actually have cracked any encryption. For all we know they just have a wallet.dat file with no key.

then why would they move the coins so long after the arrest? i'd say he used a moderately strong wallet password and they cracked it.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
I don't see anything that proves they actually have cracked any encryption. For all we know they just have a wallet.dat file with no key.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
What doesn't kill you only makes you sicker!

A the cat's identification led to knightmb? Sounds more like parallel construction to me...

They probably already knew who they were going after but just needed some way of reaching him without letting everyone know they had intel on him from nefarious communication capture techniques.
full member
Activity: 143
Merit: 100
He might have struck a deal. Gave them access to the wallet in exchange for dropping the murder charges. In recent Forbes article there's no mention of him facing murder chargers anymore.

I doubt about dropping the murder charges if he really murdered someone. And if he does not, does the murder charge mean anything at all ?
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
He might have struck a deal. Gave them access to the wallet in exchange for dropping the murder charges. In recent Forbes article there's no mention of him facing murder chargers anymore.

Sorry, I was talking about the off-topic of knightmb, and even my own experiences.
Pages:
Jump to: