Pages:
Author

Topic: Feathercoin 0.8.7.0 Released - The NeoScrypt Update - Hardfork block 432,000 - page 14. (Read 45074 times)

member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
Shit works on 14.9: https://github.com/wolf9466/neo-gpuminer

I fixed just enough of that disaster to get it to work.
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 254
compile windows ? version

Download my CL file, delete your bins, and replace the existing CL file - it will work, as that's all I've changed.


I have tried out some new configurations using your new .cl file and can confirm it works with 14.9 drivers.

Thanks for your work on this!
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 11
compile windows ? version
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
What kind of hash is everyone pulling? Here's some of my baseline results so far on standard +~10% OC

13.12 catalyst drivers:
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 53kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 48kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: ~28kh

nvidia 240 drivers:
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 22kh

Edit: Lower the worksize, it seems to help a large amount, 16-32 seems to be right
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 78kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 76kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: 41kh
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 26kh worksize 16 can't go lower =[

My 660ti reports only ~80% "power consumption" at OC so it runs pretty cool and is proportionate in hash to the other cards (the way it looks like it should be anyhow).  i.e. in x11 it would read like ~105%.

13.12 drivers (used 13.12 to generate the bin as well): 107kh/s on 7950 @ 1000/1250 with some kernel edits.
IIRC, my 280X on 14.9 (used 14.9 to generate bin, too) did somewhere around 160kh/s @ 1140/1500.

Oops, was wrong about the 280X. On 14.9, I have a 290X and a 280X, 290X does 200kh/s at stock clocks, 280X does around 175kh/s.

Screenshot (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11012014.png
Also has settings there.

Huh

Your link 2 flags..
https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/a173bb61fbb94e46e4e1e8ab06a1ac98c6c323d1f77ba3d3db6d4d7715d22c87/analysis/1414857527/

... and has been blacklisted ..
http://quttera.com/detailed_report/ottrbutt.com

Odd, does it say why? I host compiled miners, that could be it.

EDIT: Oh, nvm - two shitty little pieces of software have blacklisted it, no biggie.

What kind of hash is everyone pulling? Here's some of my baseline results so far on standard +~10% OC

13.12 catalyst drivers:
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 53kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 48kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: ~28kh

nvidia 240 drivers:
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 22kh

Edit: Lower the worksize, it seems to help a large amount, 16-32 seems to be right
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 78kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 76kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: 41kh
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 26kh worksize 16 can't go lower =[

My 660ti reports only ~80% "power consumption" at OC so it runs pretty cool and is proportionate in hash to the other cards (the way it looks like it should be anyhow).  i.e. in x11 it would read like ~105%.

13.12 drivers (used 13.12 to generate the bin as well): 107kh/s on 7950 @ 1000/1250 with some kernel edits.
IIRC, my 280X on 14.9 (used 14.9 to generate bin, too) did somewhere around 160kh/s @ 1140/1500.

Hi Wolf0, don't you want to join FTC devs Skype group?
Seem like you did some fine work on miner!

I don't use Skype much.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1001
All cryptos are FIAT digital currency. Do not use.
What kind of hash is everyone pulling? Here's some of my baseline results so far on standard +~10% OC

13.12 catalyst drivers:
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 53kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 48kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: ~28kh

nvidia 240 drivers:
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 22kh

Edit: Lower the worksize, it seems to help a large amount, 16-32 seems to be right
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 78kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 76kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: 41kh
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 26kh worksize 16 can't go lower =[

My 660ti reports only ~80% "power consumption" at OC so it runs pretty cool and is proportionate in hash to the other cards (the way it looks like it should be anyhow).  i.e. in x11 it would read like ~105%.

13.12 drivers (used 13.12 to generate the bin as well): 107kh/s on 7950 @ 1000/1250 with some kernel edits.
IIRC, my 280X on 14.9 (used 14.9 to generate bin, too) did somewhere around 160kh/s @ 1140/1500.

Oops, was wrong about the 280X. On 14.9, I have a 290X and a 280X, 290X does 200kh/s at stock clocks, 280X does around 175kh/s.

Screenshot (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11012014.png
Also has settings there.

Huh

Your link 2 flags..
https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/a173bb61fbb94e46e4e1e8ab06a1ac98c6c323d1f77ba3d3db6d4d7715d22c87/analysis/1414857527/

... and has been blacklisted ..
http://quttera.com/detailed_report/ottrbutt.com

Odd, does it say why? I host compiled miners, that could be it.

EDIT: Oh, nvm - two shitty little pieces of software have blacklisted it, no biggie.


http://quttera.com/labs-data-url/ottrbutt.com#collapseOne

You missed the third "shitty" piece of software... Roll Eyes It doesn't like your images and thumbs folders for some reason.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1001
All cryptos are FIAT digital currency. Do not use.
Anyhoo..

My 280x/hynix is pulling 128 khash with cgminer 3.3.7b and the following settings :
gpu/mem - 1120/1500, win7 x64 cat 14.9 w/ sdk, -I 13, -w 32, -g 2

Screenie shows the 280x and 7870 at stock, same settings except -g 1 was used.
http://img.techpowerup.org/141101/NEOnoob2.jpg




where u got that cgminer 3.3.7b from i have 3.7.7 cant find cgminer 3.3.7b?...

Check the OP. Tongue

https://www.feathercoin.com/dl/cgminer-3.7.7b.neoscrypt.zip

@all

I was wrong when I said that -g 2 was used to achieve 121 khash. It was actually -g 1.

edit

And only 1 HW that likely happened while oc'd to 1120. I'm now at stock 1020 on the core.
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 254
What kind of hash is everyone pulling? Here's some of my baseline results so far on standard +~10% OC

13.12 catalyst drivers:
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 53kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 48kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: ~28kh

nvidia 240 drivers:
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 22kh

Edit: Lower the worksize, it seems to help a large amount, 16-32 seems to be right
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 78kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 76kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: 41kh
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 26kh worksize 16 can't go lower =[

My 660ti reports only ~80% "power consumption" at OC so it runs pretty cool and is proportionate in hash to the other cards (the way it looks like it should be anyhow).  i.e. in x11 it would read like ~105%.


Using BAMT version 1.6.0 and installing the latest version of neo-gpuminer (3.7.7c), I am getting around 54.4 kh per card on a rig with 5x R9 270x's, for a total of 274kh on average. Power draw for the whole rig as configured is 440 watts from the wall, measured via kill-a-watt.

My relevant configuration settings are as follows:

intensity 13
worksize 32
gpu-engine 1025
gpu-memclock 1250
gpu-threads 2

I found that dropping the intensity down from 14 to 13 seemed to give me the best speeds with the above settings. I also found that pushing the gpu and memory clocks higher did not seem to give much more in the way of increased hashrate, but it did increase the power draw. This seems inline with my experiences when I ran these rigs with scrypt mining.

I am still playing around and hope to eek out a few more khash without upping the power draw.

I also been playing with some rigs with 3x R9 280's, but while the total khash per rig is close (240 khash) my power draw from the wall is 550 watts. I have only managed to get around 80 khash per card with these, so unless I can do better I will turn them off as the breakeven is too close right now.

I like to think of things in how much I am earning after costs, thus I am getting roughly .62 kh per watt with the 270's and only about .44 kh per watt with the 280's. As I said, with current rates the 270's are profitable for me (no free electricity) but the 280's are costing money to run at their current output.

Looking for any other helpful settings to change this around, as it would be nice to put some of the cards I have laying around back into profitable use...
hero member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 507
Anyhoo..

My 280x/hynix is pulling 128 khash with cgminer 3.3.7b and the following settings :
gpu/mem - 1120/1500, win7 x64 cat 14.9 w/ sdk, -I 13, -w 32, -g 2

Screenie shows the 280x and 7870 at stock, same settings except -g 1 was used.





where u got that cgminer 3.3.7b from i have 3.7.7 cant find cgminer 3.3.7b?...
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1001
All cryptos are FIAT digital currency. Do not use.
Anyhoo..

My 280x/hynix is pulling 128 khash with cgminer 3.3.7b and the following settings :
gpu/mem - 1120/1500, win7 x64 cat 14.9 w/ sdk, -I 13, -w 32, -g 2 -g 1

Screenie shows the 280x and 7870 at stock, same settings except -g 1 was used.


edit

both examples used -g 1
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1001
All cryptos are FIAT digital currency. Do not use.
What kind of hash is everyone pulling? Here's some of my baseline results so far on standard +~10% OC

13.12 catalyst drivers:
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 53kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 48kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: ~28kh

nvidia 240 drivers:
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 22kh

Edit: Lower the worksize, it seems to help a large amount, 16-32 seems to be right
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 78kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 76kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: 41kh
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 26kh worksize 16 can't go lower =[

My 660ti reports only ~80% "power consumption" at OC so it runs pretty cool and is proportionate in hash to the other cards (the way it looks like it should be anyhow).  i.e. in x11 it would read like ~105%.

13.12 drivers (used 13.12 to generate the bin as well): 107kh/s on 7950 @ 1000/1250 with some kernel edits.
IIRC, my 280X on 14.9 (used 14.9 to generate bin, too) did somewhere around 160kh/s @ 1140/1500.

Oops, was wrong about the 280X. On 14.9, I have a 290X and a 280X, 290X does 200kh/s at stock clocks, 280X does around 175kh/s.

Screenshot (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11012014.png
Also has settings there.

Huh

Your link 2 flags..
https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/a173bb61fbb94e46e4e1e8ab06a1ac98c6c323d1f77ba3d3db6d4d7715d22c87/analysis/1414857527/

... and has been blacklisted ..
http://quttera.com/detailed_report/ottrbutt.com
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
What kind of hash is everyone pulling? Here's some of my baseline results so far on standard +~10% OC

13.12 catalyst drivers:
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 53kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 48kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: ~28kh

nvidia 240 drivers:
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 22kh

Edit: Lower the worksize, it seems to help a large amount, 16-32 seems to be right
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 78kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 76kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: 41kh
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 26kh worksize 16 can't go lower =[

My 660ti reports only ~80% "power consumption" at OC so it runs pretty cool and is proportionate in hash to the other cards (the way it looks like it should be anyhow).  i.e. in x11 it would read like ~105%.

13.12 drivers (used 13.12 to generate the bin as well): 107kh/s on 7950 @ 1000/1250 with some kernel edits.
IIRC, my 280X on 14.9 (used 14.9 to generate bin, too) did somewhere around 160kh/s @ 1140/1500.

Oops, was wrong about the 280X. On 14.9, I have a 290X and a 280X, 290X does 200kh/s at stock clocks, 280X does around 175kh/s.

Screenshot (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11012014.png
Also has settings there.
legendary
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1020
I was diagnosed with brain parasite
What kind of hash is everyone pulling? Here's some of my baseline results so far on standard +~10% OC

13.12 catalyst drivers:
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 53kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 48kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: ~28kh

nvidia 240 drivers:
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 22kh

Edit: Lower the worksize, it seems to help a large amount, 16-32 seems to be right
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 78kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 76kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: 41kh
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 26kh worksize 16 can't go lower =[

My 660ti reports only ~80% "power consumption" at OC so it runs pretty cool and is proportionate in hash to the other cards (the way it looks like it should be anyhow).  i.e. in x11 it would read like ~105%.

13.12 drivers (used 13.12 to generate the bin as well): 107kh/s on 7950 @ 1000/1250 with some kernel edits.
IIRC, my 280X on 14.9 (used 14.9 to generate bin, too) did somewhere around 160kh/s @ 1140/1500.

Hi Wolf0, don't you want to join FTC devs Skype group?
Seem like you did some fine work on miner!
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
So, what's this, then?  Huh

 [2014-11-01 12:00:21] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
 [2014-11-01 12:00:21] "C:\Users\admin\AppData\Local\Temp\OCL4744T8.cl", line 64
7: error: identifier
          "WORKGROUPSIZE" is undefined
  __attribute__((reqd_work_group_size(WORKGROUPSIZE, 1, 1)))

Win 7, Catalyst 14.4, R9 270, cgminer 3.7.7b
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
What kind of hash is everyone pulling? Here's some of my baseline results so far on standard +~10% OC

13.12 catalyst drivers:
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 53kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 48kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: ~28kh

nvidia 240 drivers:
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 22kh

Edit: Lower the worksize, it seems to help a large amount, 16-32 seems to be right
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 78kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 76kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: 41kh
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 26kh worksize 16 can't go lower =[

My 660ti reports only ~80% "power consumption" at OC so it runs pretty cool and is proportionate in hash to the other cards (the way it looks like it should be anyhow).  i.e. in x11 it would read like ~105%.

13.12 drivers (used 13.12 to generate the bin as well): 107kh/s on 7950 @ 1000/1250 with some kernel edits.
IIRC, my 280X on 14.9 (used 14.9 to generate bin, too) did somewhere around 160kh/s @ 1140/1500.
legendary
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1020
I was diagnosed with brain parasite
Did I just saw this in FTC team chat?  Wink



legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1002
My 7950 was getting 64 Kh/s @ 1150/1500, workload 48 and intensity 14.  Then I got a few hardware errors and dropped intensity to 13.  Hashrate bounced up to 77 Kh/s!  Great!  Oh, CGMiner 3.7.5.

+19 Kh/s from the cpuminer and I'm feeling ok.
ntz
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Good to see FTC is used.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
Just curious, where can I find a market for vendors that accept Feathercoin?  I'm not looking to exchange for bitcoin, litecoin, etc, just for vendor selling items to accept them.  I have some that I would like to spend on something productive.

Sorry for the somewhat slow answer, guess people in here are so excited about tweaking their gfx-cards again Cheesy

https://www.feathercoin.com/merchants-who-accept-ftc/

Prego!
legendary
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
"cat.13.12 pregen. *.bins ----> win7 x64 cat.14.9.1"-hook
it seems that works fine for  me:

7970 @1080/1500                  ---> hashes ~99kh/s
290(hynix) @1050/1375          ---> hashes ~122kh/s
290x/290(elpida) @1050/1375  ---> hashes ~115kh/s

1375---->1500MHz MemOC are useless for 290/290x - speed is the same as @1375MHz
Pages:
Jump to: