Hey, what is everyone getting for Neoscrypt power efficiency? At the wall, and khash per watt?
Why cant you just share your settings with us
Topic: Feathercoin 0.8.7.0 Released - The NeoScrypt Update - Hardfork block 432,000 - page 7. (Read 45074 times)
January 05, 2015, 02:27:46 AM
Why cant you just share your settings with us
January 05, 2015, 01:11:24 AM
I am having trouble with neoscrypt always saying Json inval data when I try and use the wallet as a pool. Its fully synced and I dont think its a port issue as I have this problem sometimes with other wallets and have no idea why
December 22, 2014, 07:04:36 AM
can someone tell me pls wich driver version gets better performance on R9 280x?
Any 14.x below 14.9 is usually good.
tnx
What are you getting on 280X?
Youre getting more definitely hahaha
True, but I was asking to see if he was getting a shit hashrate or not - if he needed help tuning.
Around 300kh/s, I think... someone else chime in?
State it around 250 better
December 21, 2014, 02:32:45 PM
can someone tell me pls wich driver version gets better performance on R9 280x?
Any 14.x below 14.9 is usually good.
tnx
What are you getting on 280X?
Youre getting more definitely hahaha
True, but I was asking to see if he was getting a shit hashrate or not - if he needed help tuning.
December 21, 2014, 12:18:37 PM
can someone tell me pls wich driver version gets better performance on R9 280x?
Any 14.x below 14.9 is usually good.
tnx
What are you getting on 280X?
Youre getting more definitely hahaha
December 21, 2014, 11:52:00 AM
can someone tell me pls wich driver version gets better performance on R9 280x?
Any 14.x below 14.9 is usually good.
tnx
December 21, 2014, 11:49:53 AM
can someone tell me pls wich driver version gets better performance on R9 280x?
November 08, 2014, 01:21:09 PM
Ok, let's get back to the technical aspects of mining this coin. 
I got my 7970 and 280x builds running stable anywhere from 150 khash to 160 khash, so from what I been reading I am pretty much topped out unless Wolf wants to release his private kernal.
Now I want to try to get some of my 270x boxes to work. Right now I can get them to around 60 khash on each card on Linux, which seems awfully low compared to the 280x builds. I have tried a Windows build and can get ~75 khash for awhile, but I cannot get them to run stable. I get a ton of ATI driver restart messages before it eventually just crashes the whole rig. I can get maybe a hour of run time, but at this point the build is too unreliable to trust.
The 270 rig I have been playing with is Windows 7 Pro 64 bit on a 80 GB SSD, Intel CPU, Asus ZB7-A MB, and 4 Gig G Skill RAM. I have so far tried AMD driver versions 14.9 release, 14.9.1 Beta, 14.9.2 Beta, 14.6 beta, 14.7 RC3. I did have some stability with the 13.12 drivers, however I was back in the 55-60 khash ballpark with those no matter which clock speeds or settings I tried.
Hoping someone out there has had better luck with the 270 series and would be willing to share a few tips. I will take suggestions for either Linux or Windows builds if I can get in the 80 khash+ range. I believe I read someone was getting 90+ khash out of their 270's somewhere, but I could find no details.
I got my 7970 and 280x builds running stable anywhere from 150 khash to 160 khash, so from what I been reading I am pretty much topped out unless Wolf wants to release his private kernal.
Now I want to try to get some of my 270x boxes to work. Right now I can get them to around 60 khash on each card on Linux, which seems awfully low compared to the 280x builds. I have tried a Windows build and can get ~75 khash for awhile, but I cannot get them to run stable. I get a ton of ATI driver restart messages before it eventually just crashes the whole rig. I can get maybe a hour of run time, but at this point the build is too unreliable to trust.
The 270 rig I have been playing with is Windows 7 Pro 64 bit on a 80 GB SSD, Intel CPU, Asus ZB7-A MB, and 4 Gig G Skill RAM. I have so far tried AMD driver versions 14.9 release, 14.9.1 Beta, 14.9.2 Beta, 14.6 beta, 14.7 RC3. I did have some stability with the 13.12 drivers, however I was back in the 55-60 khash ballpark with those no matter which clock speeds or settings I tried.
Hoping someone out there has had better luck with the 270 series and would be willing to share a few tips. I will take suggestions for either Linux or Windows builds if I can get in the 80 khash+ range. I believe I read someone was getting 90+ khash out of their 270's somewhere, but I could find no details.
Probably me, with around 130kh/s.
December 16, 2014, 05:00:07 AM
I put the Feathercoin Wallet 2 App on my tablet and it synced to Block 431999 - Which was on October 26.
Does https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.feathercoin.wallet support the Neoscrypt Fork?
Does https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.feathercoin.wallet support the Neoscrypt Fork?
It should support NeoScrypt. Iam redirecting this request to our AppTeam. Thanks for the heads up!
Regards,
ChekaZ
December 13, 2014, 04:10:48 PM
I put the Feathercoin Wallet 2 App on my tablet and it synced to Block 431999 - Which was on October 26.
Does https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.feathercoin.wallet support the Neoscrypt Fork?
Does https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.feathercoin.wallet support the Neoscrypt Fork?
December 09, 2014, 03:00:27 AM
So guys any nice conf or bat file for r9 280x?
Sorry don't have a bat file, but if you have a look at this website you can see what other people are getting out of their similar cards to let you know if your setup is on the markhttp://hw.neoscrypt.tk/index.php
That may be useful since it has my model number in it thanks
December 09, 2014, 02:25:16 AM
So guys any nice conf or bat file for r9 280x?
Sorry don't have a bat file, but if you have a look at this website you can see what other people are getting out of their similar cards to let you know if your setup is on the markhttp://hw.neoscrypt.tk/index.php
December 08, 2014, 05:28:21 AM
So guys any nice conf or bat file for r9 280x?
November 07, 2014, 06:33:47 PM
https://github.com/wolf9466/neo-gpuminer
His github download is bringing up flags that I've never seen before.
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/6e56aa88edecbc4a865598b2db212751f4bfba0b03232ba83c4d599238b10dea/analysis/1415283585/
His github download is bringing up flags that I've never seen before.
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/6e56aa88edecbc4a865598b2db212751f4bfba0b03232ba83c4d599238b10dea/analysis/1415283585/
I've been making SGMiner releases long before SG5 was a thought in anyone's mind. People trust me, especially because I sign shit with the same GPG key I use for bitcoin OTC. If you don't - fine. But until you have actual evidence of malware - hint: you will find none - quit with the bullshit.
If you cannot handle my simple questions and findings, then maybe you shouldn't be allowing others to examine or make use of your work.
You may know it is safe but the general public does not. Do you see how this "trust me or gtfo" mentality does nothing but stunt/slow Feathercoin's (and neoS mining) progress ?
Or maybe.. that is exactly what the crypto "elite" want. eg. limit/slow the competition's growth (thus why you borked solo mining neoS at the kernal level
)I don't have a "trust me or gtfo" mentality. I'm just irritated that you blow a couple false positives out of proportion, causing less savvy users to possibly get frightened. It's called spreading FUD - having evidence of nothing, but trying to find something to scare people. By the way, *I* didn't write the slow as shit code for neoscrypt - *I* donated a fix for 14.x.
EDIT: Just noticed you think I broke it for solo mining. You idiot, the kernel code only computes the hash - my kernel is used in cgminer 3.8, and there's no issues. And I didn't write the SG port.
November 22, 2014, 02:37:21 AM
Nope, -k neoscrypt doesn't work for me with sgminer, I'm getting that "Error 11" thing with it. Anyway, I've found out what the problem was, it's just my linux skills suck.. I was trying to start the miner by simply calling "sgminer" after "cd-ing" to its folder but it seems like I've had a "system-wide" installation (with "make install") of some older version of sgminer previously and whenever I was trying to start this new sgminer, that older one was running instead. And it was running the regular scrypt algo instead of neoscrypt, thus all the rejected shares. So, as Wolf0 said, "--algorithm neoscrypt" is the right way to go here, I just had to call the miner with the full path specified, that is "/home/myusername/neo-sgminer5-hawaii/sgminer" in my case.
By the way, with this hawaii version — at least with "normal" raw-intensity of 6144, tc 8192, g 2, w 256 — I'm getting a lot lower hashrate on my tahiti (280x elpida), some 210k. The same card does 280k with the regular sgminer 5.
By the way, with this hawaii version — at least with "normal" raw-intensity of 6144, tc 8192, g 2, w 256 — I'm getting a lot lower hashrate on my tahiti (280x elpida), some 210k. The same card does 280k with the regular sgminer 5.
November 21, 2014, 04:01:58 PM
For you guys with Hawaii cards, or guys who just want to try something new, here: https://github.com/wolf9466/neo-sgminer5-hawaii
Should help you get this (270X, 290X, and 290X, in that order; nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11212014.png
Thanks. A stupid question - how do I make it do neoscrypt? Should help you get this (270X, 290X, and 290X, in that order; nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11212014.png
With cgminer I was using "--neoscrypt" option as a command line argument, but sgminer doesn't recognize it. If I use "--algorithm neoscrypt" it starts hashing, but seems like it's trying to do regular scrypt because the name of the .bin file created starts with "ckolivas" and all my shares are rejected with "above target" message. And if I use "-k neoscrypt", I'm getting:"Error 11: Building program (clBuildProgram)
[16:48:32] "/tmp/OCL6205T5.cl", line 506: error: identifier "MAX_GLOBAL_THREADS"
is
undefined
__global ulong16 *V = (__global ulong16 *)(padcache + (0x4000 * (get_glo
bal_id(0) % MAX_GLOBAL_THREADS)));
[16:48:32] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
[16:48:32] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this."
Kinda stuck here, how does it work?
Or just use -k neoscrypt , works for me.
November 21, 2014, 07:50:22 AM
For you guys with Hawaii cards, or guys who just want to try something new, here: https://github.com/wolf9466/neo-sgminer5-hawaii
Should help you get this (270X, 290X, and 290X, in that order; nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11212014.png
Thanks. A stupid question - how do I make it do neoscrypt? Should help you get this (270X, 290X, and 290X, in that order; nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11212014.png
With cgminer I was using "--neoscrypt" option as a command line argument, but sgminer doesn't recognize it. If I use "--algorithm neoscrypt" it starts hashing, but seems like it's trying to do regular scrypt because the name of the .bin file created starts with "ckolivas" and all my shares are rejected with "above target" message. And if I use "-k neoscrypt", I'm getting:"Error 11: Building program (clBuildProgram)
[16:48:32] "/tmp/OCL6205T5.cl", line 506: error: identifier "MAX_GLOBAL_THREADS"
is
undefined
__global ulong16 *V = (__global ulong16 *)(padcache + (0x4000 * (get_glo
bal_id(0) % MAX_GLOBAL_THREADS)));
[16:48:32] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
[16:48:32] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this."
Kinda stuck here, how does it work?
November 21, 2014, 04:46:35 AM
Somebody is accumulating insane amount of FTC. Look at charts on bitcoinwisdom
November 21, 2014, 03:01:33 AM
Jump to: