Topic: FeathercoinMyths.com is Live (Read 1701 times)
Feathercoin seems to be one of the more active coins in the alt-coins arena, if any of them is to succeed, Feathercoin will stand a very high chance.
I am struggling to understand how any crypto would be supported by anyone after something like this: http://imgur.com/a/fTye4#10 (pdf: http://maxminer.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/ftc_51attack.pdf)
Quote
There exists a Feathercoin user holding about a fifth of all coins with the intent and capability to execute a highly damaging attack to the network and its users.
Quote
Do you seriously think this?
Plain ridiculous
Several devs are fuckers but FTC devs are from being the only ones who care about their clone
Plain ridiculous
Several devs are fuckers but FTC devs are from being the only ones who care about their clone
I dont care about other devs .... btw every coin (except btc) is a clone ... LTC to;-)
It's funny how all shitcoins have to criticize others to exist and justify their history
It's comical these losers try and spread rumors after crying about "FTC Myths"...
The first GPU miner for LTC was developed by the Solidcoin losers to try and 51% it, months after LTC was launched. ArtForz (rip) was working on a GPU miner for LTC but could never get it to work and quit development on it when the Solidcoin bunch released Reaper.
In Solidcoin's foolish attempts to develop a GPU miner to kill LTC, they saved LTC by bringing on hashrate which protected it against Botnets.
The early LTC network hash rate and difficulty do not support the claim of GPU mining from block zero.
Note to FTC Devs:
Start down the path of Solidcoin FUD against LTC and you will suffer the same fate.
~BCX~
Talk about biting the hand which fed them success. FTC rode on LTC's name as some inferior lighter coin and now they spread FUD about.
I will never support FTC.
Re-read the thread. The "FUD" you are talking about was not FUD but moreso just an assumption. Even BitcoinExpress detracted his statement on the "FUD".
Also re-read the OP.
It's funny how all shitcoins have to criticize others to exist and justify their history
It's comical these losers try and spread rumors after crying about "FTC Myths"...
The first GPU miner for LTC was developed by the Solidcoin losers to try and 51% it, months after LTC was launched. ArtForz (rip) was working on a GPU miner for LTC but could never get it to work and quit development on it when the Solidcoin bunch released Reaper.
In Solidcoin's foolish attempts to develop a GPU miner to kill LTC, they saved LTC by bringing on hashrate which protected it against Botnets.
The early LTC network hash rate and difficulty do not support the claim of GPU mining from block zero.
Note to FTC Devs:
Start down the path of Solidcoin FUD against LTC and you will suffer the same fate.
~BCX~
Talk about biting the hand which fed them success. FTC rode on LTC's name as some inferior lighter coin and now they spread FUD about.
I will never support FTC.
Wrong conclusion, these are the only devs who seem to care!
please provide facts no conclusions/personal opinions
Do you seriously think this?please provide facts no conclusions/personal opinions
Plain ridiculous
Several devs are fuckers but FTC devs are from being the only ones who care about their clone
Wrong conclusion, these are the only devs who seem to care!
please provide facts no conclusions/personal opinions
please provide facts no conclusions/personal opinions
1. Instamine - We'll address the 'Litecoin didn't mine that heavy day 1 ' *cough* no GPU miner *cough*
Is it necessary to attack other coins or is it that you offer nothing and it's the only way to attempt a promotion?
Take the high road and avoid the negative. If you truly have innovation let that speak.
A really good post and informational set of YT Vids, except for that smudge of crap.
~BCX~
It's funny how all shitcoins have to criticize others to exist and justify their history
I too find this hilarious. The fact a lead dev of Feathercoin has to pimp his coin in such a way proves what FTC actually is.
There is one simple fact that Feathercoin can't run from. FTC is a 51% forked coin with fake blocks in it's chain. FTC is lower than low. The pimpers know they scam.
tl;dr
The public image of FTC is so bad even the devs have to pimp it.
Posted while OP was listening to Renegade by STYX.
Jus' sayin'.
Jus' sayin'.
By saying feathercoin is dead, in effect, you are increasing its popularity.
Which is the ironic part
It's called the Streisand Effect.
For those of us that are tired of repeating ourselves, I give you:
http://www.Feathercoinmyths.com
Additional videos to follow:
1. Instamine - **Update** Additional clarification: The term is ridiculous, we'll explore where this nonsense comes from.We'll address the 'Litecoin didn't mine that heavy day 1 ' *cough* no GPU miner *cough* ** Update ** Comparing Feathercoin's launch when hashing was quite a bit higher vs Litecoin when it didn't have a GPU miner 'back in those days' is apples and oranges. It's different people, this shouldn't even be a debate.
2. Feathercoin Tried too Hard - I'll have fun with this one
3. Only new innovation coins matter - We'll talk about geek dreams vs WU/Moneygram
4. Feathercoin isn't going anywhere - Well, I'll need to wait until our partner coins are ready to make announcements.
These were fun, fairly rough edits. I noticed our forum members keep responding to the same nonsense here, so I thought I'd make it quicker for everyone involved.
http://www.Feathercoinmyths.com
Additional videos to follow:
1. Instamine - **Update** Additional clarification: The term is ridiculous, we'll explore where this nonsense comes from.
2. Feathercoin Tried too Hard - I'll have fun with this one
3. Only new innovation coins matter - We'll talk about geek dreams vs WU/Moneygram
4. Feathercoin isn't going anywhere - Well, I'll need to wait until our partner coins are ready to make announcements.
These were fun, fairly rough edits. I noticed our forum members keep responding to the same nonsense here, so I thought I'd make it quicker for everyone involved.
And now we have clarification. So those who rather assume now can retract their statements on what OP really meant.
By saying feathercoin is dead, in effect, you are increasing its popularity.
Which is the ironic part
By saying feathercoin is dead, in effect, you are increasing its popularity.
Updated the original post for clarification. Please go forth Statler and Waldorfs of the crypto world, carry on.
Hmmm, why isnt the team just focusing on PhenixCoin ? Feathercoin is dying, dead, and Worldcoin never did much.
I almost agree, i don't say ftc is dead nor wdc is not worth having too. But really i see no gain at all for pxc in this union.
It's funny how all shitcoins have to criticize others to exist and justify their history
It's comical these losers try and spread rumors after crying about "FTC Myths"...
The first GPU miner for LTC was developed by the Solidcoin losers to try and 51% it, months after LTC was launched. ArtForz (rip) was working on a GPU miner for LTC but could never get it to work and quit development on it when the Solidcoin bunch released Reaper.
In Solidcoin's foolish attempts to develop a GPU miner to kill LTC, they saved LTC by bringing on hashrate which protected it against Botnets.
The early LTC network hash rate and difficulty do not support the claim of GPU mining from block zero.
Note to FTC Devs:
Start down the path of Solidcoin FUD against LTC and you will suffer the same fate.
~BCX~
What are you talking about? What FUD is being spread about LTC?
You of all people shouldn't be talking given your track record. Mr. I-Am-Going-To-51-%-Attack-Litecoin-So-I-Spread-FUD-To-Cause-Panic-Then-Run-Away-Because-I-Was-Outted-For-My-BS.
Oh the irony is astounding BCX
Edit: I don't believe the OP was insinuating that Litecoin had a GPU miner from day one. He is putting it into perspective that there was no GPU miner and that FTC had GPU scrypt mining army that did not exist when Litecoin started. Perhaps you should ask questions first before shooting as opposed to doing the opposite.
While I agree that taking the highroad and avoiding the negative is a great way to go at it, responding to seemingly valid criticism is brave and shows that the FTC team takes itself and the crypto community as a whole seriously.
Nice vid !
Nice vid !
is that a two way street?
While I agree that taking the highroad and avoiding the negative is a great way to go at it, responding to seemingly valid criticism is brave and shows that the FTC team takes itself and the crypto community as a whole seriously.
Nice vid !
Nice vid !
1. Instamine - We'll address the 'Litecoin didn't mine that heavy day 1 ' *cough* no GPU miner *cough*
Is it necessary to attack other coins or is it that you offer nothing and it's the only way to attempt a promotion?
Take the high road and avoid the negative. If you truly have innovation let that speak.
A really good post and informational set of YT Vids, except for that smudge of crap.
~BCX~
It's funny how all shitcoins have to criticize others to exist and justify their history
I just believe it would be much smarter for these teams to focus on one coin rather than three, a lot more could be accomplished, like a ray of light, when it gets deflected several times, it loses energy and brightness, but when it focuses on one point only, it remains strong.
But that would require taking ego out of the equation and doing that hurts people's ego.
While I agree with your sentiment, I think there's room for all three to succeed on their own.
If not, your plan sounds good.
Jump to: