1. Slandering. He claims - I decided to be a big asshole to anyone who had questioned on bitlucy ANN
Troll like bislom,
- I had a response for a case which needed to be responded (1, 2). There are no sign of I was being an asshole in the response. I was providing a solution.
- Explaining the situation to a user (3). Again with a good manner.
- Reply of an argument with providing solution again (4).
- Announced the termination of bitcointalk with bitlucy and highlighted the google form to get better visibility for it (6).
- It does not look like cool head is absent (7).
8 pages of response and I made 5 posts on the 1st reputation thread before I created my own thread (call it 2nd reputation thread) to give the brief of the story.
- I wanted to make a point of the users that they had problems with other casinos too, it's nothing new etc before I was providing them a solution (8). Nowhere I was being asshole to response.
- Posting an update for a concerned user with an apology (9).
- Maybe I sound a bit of asshole when I said I don't need to prove myself to others too but it's no near than yahoo's claim of being big asshole to anyone. I was polite enough to express how I was feeling (10).
I became an asshole (11) to Yahoo and JollyGood (5*20) + (7*20 + 6) + (38*20 + 11) posts. They were crossing the line with their bullshit arguments for example the lamest one is demanding the chats to be in public.
I know what I did and how I did. Only saying word seems unfair so I found it's best to spend enough time to collect reference. Yahoo's claim of me being a big asshole to anyone (indicating to ANN thread and probably on the 1st reputation thread) is completely lie.
Yahoo's intention is clear that he is slandering.
2. Wants to exchange the negative feedback
Yahoo wants to exchange the red tag for the apology he is demanding now.