I'm wondering why there are no auto-exchange multipools with scrypt-jane algo.
Is there some technical limitation?
It looks like it's a profitable algo to mine, that's why I'm asking.
Topic: FFPOOL.NET [MULTIPOOL][MULTIALGO] Point your Miners and get paid in BTC directly - page 7. (Read 17910 times)
July 28, 2015, 09:34:38 AM
July 26, 2015, 11:15:32 AM
July 26, 2015, 06:07:25 AM
I have not received payouts in DASH for more than 50 hours http://ffpool.net/?address=XwrxLhFDWXwXjr867mfLLACkaREZUF3CRS Help me, please.
Hey !
Your balance is currently empty, so everything has been already paid out. Are your miners still active ?
July 25, 2015, 05:59:44 PM
I have not received payouts in DASH for more than 50 hours http://ffpool.net/?address=XwrxLhFDWXwXjr867mfLLACkaREZUF3CRS Help me, please.
July 24, 2015, 11:39:08 AM
Is there some kind of congestion control on API queries?
I'm getting a lot of failures.
I'm getting a lot of failures.
There is a rate-limit on the API, but its threshold is not too low.. What error do you get ?
No error message, just a NULL return from file_get_contents.
Code:
php > var_dump(json_decode(file_get_contents('http://ffpool.net/api/status')));
NULL
php > var_dump(json_decode(file_get_contents('http://ffpool.net/api/status')));
object(stdClass)#1 (10) {
["sha256"]=>
...
No update?
I'm getting a response but the response has no data. Looks like a problem with the backend.
In the meantime I've added a retry and that seems to have solved my problem.
July 24, 2015, 10:41:35 AM
getting low hashrate again, sometimes even no hashrate reported.
No problems here
tried on another yaamp based pool, same algo, same coins, no problems.
rented some quark rigs now to check ...
July 24, 2015, 10:18:20 AM
getting low hashrate again, sometimes even no hashrate reported.
No problems here
tried on another yaamp based pool, same algo, same coins, no problems.
July 24, 2015, 10:08:04 AM
getting low hashrate again, sometimes even no hashrate reported.
No problems here
July 24, 2015, 09:19:58 AM
getting low hashrate again, sometimes even no hashrate reported.
July 24, 2015, 09:10:37 AM
We already had a lot more hashrate on the quark port (>40g) and had no problems, so normally this "little" hash in comparison shouldn't have been a problem at all..
we'll be checking/testing nicehash again... There have been some problems reported in conjunction.
we'll be checking/testing nicehash again... There have been some problems reported in conjunction.
July 24, 2015, 08:12:06 AM
It looked like you had massive overload according to NiceHash chart:
July 24, 2015, 07:37:10 AM
Disabled BIOS for now.
Is it looking better?
Is it looking better?
yep, reported rate is back to normal
got it fixed!
confirmed, bios is back and working fine, thanks!
July 24, 2015, 07:30:20 AM
Disabled BIOS for now.
Is it looking better?
Is it looking better?
yep, reported rate is back to normal
got it fixed!
July 24, 2015, 04:16:32 AM
Disabled BIOS for now.
Is it looking better?
Is it looking better?
July 24, 2015, 04:07:43 AM
maybe its a coincidence but since adding BIOS coin pool reports unacceptably low hashrate for quark algo.
some 4.5-5mh instead of 12-13 per card.
miner hashrate and WU are normal, smth's wrong on the pool side
some 4.5-5mh instead of 12-13 per card.
miner hashrate and WU are normal, smth's wrong on the pool side
I'm experiencing a good amount of rejects as well, but profit is fine nevertheless.
i don't see any rejects, 0 rejects, WU is standard 45-50 for 280x,
everything is fine, but pool-reported hashrate is 3 times lower
now that I look at it more closely, one miner has 90% rejects, the other almost 0% but reported hashrate on ffpool is 30-40% :-(
on hashpower.co, which is also based on yaamp, I do not experience the same problem, so probably related to BIOS indeed.
July 24, 2015, 03:22:52 AM
maybe its a coincidence but since adding BIOS coin pool reports unacceptably low hashrate for quark algo.
some 4.5-5mh instead of 12-13 per card.
miner hashrate and WU are normal, smth's wrong on the pool side
some 4.5-5mh instead of 12-13 per card.
miner hashrate and WU are normal, smth's wrong on the pool side
I'm experiencing a good amount of rejects as well, but profit is fine nevertheless.
July 22, 2015, 05:58:23 PM
Is there some kind of congestion control on API queries?
I'm getting a lot of failures.
I'm getting a lot of failures.
There is a rate-limit on the API, but its threshold is not too low.. What error do you get ?
No error message, just a NULL return from file_get_contents.
Code:
php > var_dump(json_decode(file_get_contents('http://ffpool.net/api/status')));
NULL
php > var_dump(json_decode(file_get_contents('http://ffpool.net/api/status')));
object(stdClass)#1 (10) {
["sha256"]=>
...
July 22, 2015, 04:50:38 PM
Is there some kind of congestion control on API queries?
I'm getting a lot of failures.
I'm getting a lot of failures.
There is a rate-limit on the API, but its threshold is not too low.. What error do you get ?
July 22, 2015, 04:43:15 PM
Is there some kind of congestion control on API queries?
I'm getting a lot of failures.
I'm getting a lot of failures.
July 22, 2015, 10:53:53 AM
Its quite funny our main account got banned for "pool spam" - no idea what we did wrong, but in case you have any problems, just msg me here.
Moon will be hopefully profitable again, there are currently no buys, thats why it is at 0.000
Just FYI check this link https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unofficial-list-of-official-bitcointalkorg-rules-guidelines-faq-703657Moon will be hopefully profitable again, there are currently no buys, thats why it is at 0.000
You are no longer allowed to post in ANN threads that you have added a coin to your pool, that's probably why you got banned.
I believe you have to PM the OP and request you are added to the ANN.
Hope that helps
Jump to: