Topic: Fighting the FUD of PoW versus Po(Insert favorite word here)!! (Read 346 times)

BUT, Hashcash IS also Proof of Work, and the function is fundamentally the same in that they require a verifiable proof that an amount of compute was done.

Satoshi cited Adam Back, and his invention in Hashcash, and Satoshi implemented Proof of Work based on Adam Back’s invention.

Thank you Adam Back, if your brilliant mind didn’t exist in our universe, Satoshi would currently be lost in looking for a solution for the Byzantine Generals Problem.





Gaslighting again?

one last time
without fire.... no candles
but a caveman did not invent or contribute to candles

stop over selling someones involvement when they were not physically involved in bitcoins creation
adam back only heard about bitcoin after its creation.

remember.. inspiration is not the same as implementation

donald trump quotes many now dead presidents as trumps inspiration.. that does not mean those dead presidents were making the laws of the US in 2016-2020

there is no hashcash code implemented in bitcoin.

PoW is a candle.. not a cavemans bonfire

if you cant tell the difference between a bonfire and a candle. then thats an issue you need to sort out for yourself, along with

a car is not a wheelbarrow
a mp3 player is not a LP record player
a fibre cable is not a copper telegram cable
a laser printer is not a parchment printing press
a excavator/digger truck is not a pickaxe

remember inspiration is not invention or implementation

..
incase you dont get your own words. let me rephrase your words
'NSA implemented bitcoin' is what you are trying to say
because atleast NSA code (crytography) is in bitcoin.. unlike hashcash

but we all know NSA didnt implement bitcoin.. (well apart from you)
even nick szabo does not acclaim himself as someone that implemented bitcoin.

Drama? I was merely posting FACTS. Satoshi also cited Adam Back and Hashcash in the Bitcoin white paper. Without Hashcash, no Bitcoin.


I never said anything. But you’re obviously discrediting Adam Back.


  What FUD. Gaslighting again? Hahaha.


OK, but Adam Back’s indirect contribution to Bitcoin still cannot be dicredited. Without Hashcash, would Satoshi thought of inventing the missing piece? The most important piece?

i know you are purposefully trying to poke the bear to trigger another social drama debate
and i know you then want your buddy to chime in to double up the drama

adam back did not write any bitcoin code in 2008-10, also hashcash includes:
sha1 email date

PoW does not include:
sha1 email date

thus PoW is not hashcash and hashcash is not in PoW
there is no hashcash code in bitcoin
so now i have debunked your PoW FUD twice. accept it. learn from it

but in short as for inspiration
hashcash vs PoW
is like
caveman bonfire vs scented candle

inspiration is very different than implementation
so your statement " that Hashcash/POW, as implemented in Bitcoin" is wrong

no cavemen were involved in the production of combustible scented candle wicks

have a nice day..

From my perspective, I think that Elon has already done enough damage for cryptocurrency. So damaged were his "strategy" that this forum always show Elon this and Elon that. Remember, Elon is not Satoshi, if satoshis wallet suddenly moves to sell the coin then I might listen but aside from that, no Elons will change my opinion about cryptocurrency. Proof of Work is what drives these miners and I think aside from PoW, maybe I might also support PoS as I had experience with them in the past. For me these are two different systems so I don't have to compare them.

 

Wasn’t it the idea of Hashcash where Satoshi got the the idea to implementation it as Proof of Work for Bitcoin? Your hate for the Core developers has made you bitter, and it makes you discard Adam Back’s contribution in Satoshi’s invention of Bitcoin. Why?

I've been waiting for you to say something dishonest or misleading but, to my surprise, you're actually doing okay so far.  It's a refreshing change of pace that I don't have to take immediate issue with something you've just said.  It's almost like they've finally put you on the right meds or something.  The post just prior to yours even managed to mention Lightning without triggering you into one of your usual tirades.  For what it's worth, I sincerely hope your current trend of rationality continues.

---

I'm rather indifferent towards his personal growth and betterment.  Whether he gets it or not, at some point, the market should outgrow his puppetry.  Let him have his misguided fun while he can.

hashcash is not implemented in bitcoin.
inspiration from hashcash was used to then have satoshi develop something himself called PoW.
hashcash vs PoW are different things
much like a candle is different from dynamite
acknowledging hashcash inspiration does not mean the same as having the actually hashcash in bitcoin

whats next.. will windfury say that elons EV cars are actually alex volta's property. where windfury just says 'because volta invented the battery'
nope elons EV batteries are nothing like the batteries volta invented..

cavemen made fire.
but a candle was not made by cavemen

hashcash header has: email date and a hash using sha1
bitcoin does not. so its not hashcash

..
but now i come to think of it. it its taken 4 years for windfury to not learn some basic stuff.
maybe suggesting elon learning the basics in a couple weeks is a error. . maybe elon might need a month
48x faster then windfury can work things out.. i think thats fair

(now awaits windfury to call on his best buddy doomad to defend windfury's honour and start some silly preteen social drama. like they always do)

Through all this madness, I am trying to keep my faith that Elon, at the end of the day, is the guy who re-landed the Falcon rockets and that giant, pointy piece of Stainless steel. If he really gets down to it, he should realize why PoW is important and why scaling isn't as simple as increasing blocksize.

Till now, he isn't showing may signs of coming to an intelligent conclusion though. Just today he was arguing about how Moore's law will catch up with the requirements for an increased block-size (completing ignoring the syncing time argument). Then there is of course the BSV shills and the ADA, AVAX shills inviting him for coffee.

One silver lining though was that he said "For now, we need lightning", referring to LN of course.

The main problem of their so-called cost is that they are thinking of something actually buying those coins as it will happen with bitcoin mining gear.
But in PoS, you gain more coins as you stake more, with PoW you don't produce more ASICs while you mine, no matter how much the guys at Cardano or any other Pos coin are trying to hide it behind fancy numbers there are some facts that can't be denied

- people who can afford to keep their coins staked are going to get more coins
- people who actively use coins are paying those who don't give a damn about real-life usage
- this model leads clearly only to the accumulation for the one that already has coins
- they can stick their 5 trillion tx per second somewhere as in PoS models there is one more incentive to not spend compared to PoW
- with every single epoch and every cent in price rise true decentralization is harder and harder to achieve
 

Yes! I can definitely say as a veteran of POS that just having the algorithm itself on its own and saying it is a cheap and efficient way to secure the network is not enough. Much less to be about decentralizaton (for example Vitalik owns a lot of ETH and many block validators will be huge ones). But I believe they will run different incentives to choose different and more diverse validators instead of just big ETH owners.

Indeed.  With PoW, there's a financial disincentive to divide your own available hashing power between pools, as it could reduce your chances of finding a block.  With PoS, it's trivial to form dozens of pools and it won't cause any major penalties to your chances of staking coins.  Which makes the overall number of pools meaningless.

And when Cardano supporters make the argument that the cost of a 51% attack:
that sounds a little disingenuous when people were accumulating ADA before it was worth $1.  Back in 2017 it was worth $0.03 US.

He is smart indeed and has a big capital and big corporations behind to support his tweets and price manipulations.

People actually don't care too much with his wisdom or knowledge about Bitcoin or crypto in tweets. They care about his actions with the market, buy, sell and speculation. He knows what the crowd want to see with his tweets.

Consequently, with his intelligence, he knows what to tweet. The crowd react and support his funny tweets. His jobs are done very easily.

Miners will care more about their investments into mining farms, ASICs, cooling ventilation system, available cheap power supplies, and seasonal effects. They don't want to wipe out what they have built up and used so far. They don't want to gamble with weather, rain, wind for their mining.

Plus give it a couple more weeks, because of the genius that he is, Elon Musk will realize that Hashcash/POW, as implemented in Bitcoin, is the greatest/biggest break-through/discovery for creating a truly decentralized, censorship-resistant protocol. Or maybe he already knows it, and he trolls.

So this thread was about the PoW FUDders who are proposing alternatives as they find this to be the right time due to a "disturbance in the force". The topic brought us to the usual suspects.

Yes, there have been multiple instances of these masternode and PoS coins launching and disappearing. As you said, the one to watch out for is Ethereum going to PoS. I see very little about how it has planned for decentralization. Even if that works as a smart-contract platform, it'll only be because the people using it are familiar with BTC.

You've been shilling Cardano. I get it as ADA has seen a lot of interest recently with several newbies joining it to join the public stake pools. Just to remind you that all this time, the pools were being run by their foundation and two more entities. So effectively, just 3 entities controlled the whole network.

I have replied to another one of your posts here which talks about the same thing.

LOL. Space-time ninjutsu. Of course it is that. I am still reading their whitepaper to see what they are upto. What is your impression vis-a-vis PoW.

If Elon realizes these things then he isn't Elon.

Think about it. He buys Bitcoin and adds it and then later finds out it costs money to secure.

Then he jokes about DOGE and claims it's a hustle but then says he wants to work on the developers to make some improvements.

Then he thinks about energy efficient protocols.

He doesn't realize anything. He is told things and gets excited about things like a regular Twitter person with new toys.

OK.. I agree that Cardano prices have gone up a lot recently and right now it is the 5th largest cryptocurrency in terms of market capitalization. But in terms of adoption, Cardnao is far behind lower ranking coins such as Litecoin and Bitcoin Cash. How many online stores accept Cardano as a payment now?To tell the truth, none of the online shopping sites I use are accepting ADA as a form of payment. It may be due to the lack of liquidity, or may be due to the difficulty in storing the coins. Or maybe the store owners have realized that the security level for ADA is not satisfactory.   

CHIA team also have a space-time ninjutsu and they used it to move the project from years ago to 2021 in the perfect hype period of market. Algorithms are valid, coins are valid but only their values are different.

Sames as Ethereum does with GPU markets and there are FUDs to keep people stay beyond the CHIA party.

Bitcoin consumes too much energy, not green. CHIA destroyes SSD and HDDs. Funny FUDs.

Garbage sometimes has value of gold or diamond.

give it a couple weeks....
Elon will realise that instead of thinking: 20% of mining is in china.. and XX% of chinese residential electric is fossil fuel

he will realise that the mining farms are located in locations of renewable power grids.
he will realise that the mining farms dont even compete by using a share of the residential power allotment.but they buy up the excess 'capacity' which is never paid for before and just went to waste.


put it this way if there is a 20gwh capacity power station
it is usually servicing 6.6gw residential 6.3gw commercial 4.8 industrial. 2gw excess

a mining farm buys up contracts of the 2gw excess allotment

this means instead of a powergrid only getting say
residential per hour: $396k at 6c/kwh
commercial per hour: $315k at 5c/kwh
industrial per hour: $192k at 4c/kwh
excess: $0
instead the power station gets(onlong with the top 3)
excess: $80k at 4c/per kwh
...
asic mining farms actually chose from 2014 to place their mining farms in renewable energy area's

so while small rural residents are using outdated power stations in other locations of china.
asic mining farms are in the uptodate area's where renewable power generation are happening

..
so in short elon will take a couple weeks to do the calculations and realise that bitcoin is already under 1% of fossil fuel utility
and he will then learn that there are no large asic mining farms for doge. and its actually home hobby miners using residential electric from fossil fuel area's that are mining doge. making doge the worse of the two

....
and if its just about trying to shame china..
china uses 6880 twh
US uses 4194 twh

but lets put it into prospective
china uses 4.178twh per 1m population
US uses 12.67twh per 1mill population

so the US is wasting 3x electric per person compared to china

Cardano  
Currently #5 on CMK, and it is Proof of Stake now.

https://coinmarketcap.com/alexandria/article/a-deep-dive-into-cardano

FYI:
Cardano is 1.6 million times more energy efficient than bitcoin.
Cardano is a 3rd generation blockchain.