This campaign will not continue. The Dev of Vividtoken has said that he is not seeing any results from this campaign and can't justify the cost of running it. He wanted me to cut the payments down by 75% and at that point it won't be worth it for any of you guys to stick with it, let alone for me to manage it. I am really sorry about this development, this is not how I prefer to do business and I will understand if you feel let down or angry with me.
Is there anything guarantees that campaigns have results?, i mean, if i've a signature campaign, is it bound to have some results?
I think it has nothing to do, the fact that you see or don't see results of the campaign is dependent on whether others are interested. Example, if i make a signature campaign about... ants and nobody is interested in ants, i can't say there were no results because it's just not what people are looking for
I don't know if i explained myself
PS: If this question doesn't appropriate in this topic, please let me know and i'll delete it
, i hope someone answer me and
excuse my grammarPPS: I'm not part of this campaign either, i'm just curious
Indeed, I was also surprised to hear about the no result thing. If even the top rated members were unable to give any solid results, then does that mean that signature campaigns are just gimmicks, and not effective marketing tools. Do some threads offer better results than other threads? Or could it be that participants should write in a particular way to get more attention to their signatures. I think these things should be researched, in order to provide better results to the advertisers. But anyways, signatures do have one benefit. Even if people don't click the signatures, I think the company name does get more exposure compared to not being advertised in signatures.
As i said before, i think it's not what people are looking for.
With all the respect that the founders of the new ICOs deserve, i think they should do a survey or explore more deeply the tastes of each user, i don't mean that there has to be an ICO for each user, but in the tastes that all we have in particular. For example, an ICO of food (there must already be many
)
I know that everyone has a millionaire idea, but it's no use having a millionaire idea if nobody is interested, for me it's like opening a business (real life), if there are a lot of people in a street and there's no place to eat, a restaurant would be a good idea, right?, i think i've already strayed from the subject
Anyway, the future ICOs should look for a particular taste of the users that can adapt to their ideas, if there is already an ICO like that,
then do something unique that doesn't have this ICOHhampuz, i'm sorry to use your thread to discuss this, i'd like to end this debate
(if someone wants to do another thread about this debate, i'll gladly give my ideas)