[snip]To compound this problem, all nations are overprinting fiat currency in an effort to over-compensate...
The problem is that they don't actually. Printing is usually mechanism that is leading to destabilisation of any given fiat, most
central banks have in their status, that they will protect stability of a coin they govern. Law usually is set this way, so that central simply cant print in to oblivion. Nations don't habitually overprint currency?
The most glaring chart is japan's high money supply inflation in spite of its notoriously low birth rate. Inflation of money supplies is far outpacing population growth in every instance.
I think the united states has laws against debasing or devaluing the money supply. It does nothing to deter it from happening. There is considerable pressure on regulators to follow political narratives. We have witnessed the official definition of terms like unemployment being rewritten to illustrate a more aesthetic view of the economy.
Inflation is no different. In the united states, the official definition of inflation was rewritten years ago if I remember correctly. To paint a rosier image of the economy. Under the old definition of inflation, the US would be experiencing near to 10% inflation annually.
Money is being printed to oblivion around the world. One key reason why economic outlooks are bleak atm.
The thing that they do is much, much worse. They borrow. Borrow from each other at the expense of future generations. Effect is of course exactly the same, just like you described but stable, slow and semi-predicable.
Politics of acceptance for the inflation is based on a false premise, they (the bankers of today) where taught for their entire schooling, that deflationary currency is bad for the macroeconomy. 100 years ago, nobody was aware of services driven economics. It was all about industry but times has changed. Today we spend most on services not physical goods and that's why deflation proves itself quite useful because people are addicted to those services. They cant imagine life without them, so they pay despite their money gaining in value, system spins the same way, if not faster. Bitcoin proves this.
In my opinion crypto will retain it's position as safe-haven during the upcoming crisis, it will be the best store of value.
Throughout history, governments have typically operated as machines of wealth redistribution.
This means governments collect a high percentage of taxes from poor to middle class earners and redistribute that wealth to the rich who pay a significantly lower percentage of tax.
Deflationary currencies are deemed "bad" as they limit the degree to which wealth can be redistributed from the poor to the wealthy.
Borrowing is deemed "good" as it allows for governments to spend more capital on wealth redistribution than they currently have on hand.
This doesn't imply that wealthy demographics are evil or immoral. Elites have real knowledge and comprehension which allows them a superior position. For whatever reason, other demographics cannot find it within themselves to be skeptical or question the status quo sufficiently to begin to address underlying reasons behind inequality in taxation, wealth and wages.
People love to over-romanticize things within a "one percenters are so evil and corrupt" vein. While playing the victim card. I think the harsh truth is, everyone plays to win. Those at the top of the food chain are a little smarter and work a little harder at it.