LEAVE SATOSHI ALONE, OR ELSE!
No contest.
Topic: Find Satoshi (Read 6371 times)
No contest.
LEAVE SATOSHI ALONE, OR ELSE!
LEAVE SATOSHI ALONE, OR ELSE!
Satoshi is in the heavens as He is inside all of us.
I'd really like people to stop looking for Satoshi, if anyone has ever deserved anonymity it's him/her/them. I'll even go as far as proposing how we as a community can aid this:
Whenever and wherever someone makes an inqury about Satoshi just simply do your best to assure them that infact you are Satoshi.
...Here I'll go first: I am Satoshi Nakamoto.
(too bad im not good at this, but atleast some of you will agree and get the point).
- Sincerely Satoshi
Whenever and wherever someone makes an inqury about Satoshi just simply do your best to assure them that infact you are Satoshi.
...Here I'll go first: I am Satoshi Nakamoto.
(too bad im not good at this, but atleast some of you will agree and get the point).
- Sincerely Satoshi
Satoshi here. I totally agree with Satoshi.
For some reason, I felt like quoting this. Then again, it may all be for not, for if you're Satoshi, you'll simply have the admins edit the content. Knowing that, I took a screenshot.
~Bruno~
I AM SPARTICUS!!!
errr... oh wait, we are doing Satoshi.
errr... oh wait, we are doing Satoshi.
I'd really like people to stop looking for Satoshi, if anyone has ever deserved anonymity it's him/her/them. I'll even go as far as proposing how we as a community can aid this:
Whenever and wherever someone makes an inqury about Satoshi just simply do your best to assure them that infact you are Satoshi.
...Here I'll go first: I am Satoshi Nakamoto.
(too bad im not good at this, but atleast some of you will agree and get the point).
- Sincerely Satoshi
Whenever and wherever someone makes an inqury about Satoshi just simply do your best to assure them that infact you are Satoshi.
...Here I'll go first: I am Satoshi Nakamoto.
(too bad im not good at this, but atleast some of you will agree and get the point).
- Sincerely Satoshi
Satoshi here. I totally agree with Satoshi.
I'd really like people to stop looking for Satoshi, if anyone has ever deserved anonymity it's him/her/them. I'll even go as far as proposing how we as a community can aid this:
Whenever and wherever someone makes an inqury about Satoshi just simply do your best to assure them that infact you are Satoshi.
...Here I'll go first: I am Satoshi Nakamoto.
(too bad im not good at this, but atleast some of you will agree and get the point).
- Sincerely Satoshi
Whenever and wherever someone makes an inqury about Satoshi just simply do your best to assure them that infact you are Satoshi.
...Here I'll go first: I am Satoshi Nakamoto.
(too bad im not good at this, but atleast some of you will agree and get the point).
- Sincerely Satoshi
...I must admit I like you. Upon reading several of your posts, another thing I need to give you is that I've yet to encounter any grammatical faux pas in your pennings. Only a handful of posters on this board can lay claim to such an admirable feat, if you get my driftwood.
~Bruno~
~Bruno~
I like you too
. You and Goat are among the very few users who have a highlighted ignore link and I find worth reading. 90%+ of the people with the ignore link highlighted are really annoying noise generators. 
Now if I release something privately don't hunt me down.
I take that as a compliment. Goat and I have highlighted ignore links for different reason. If I'm correct, mine was generated due to my too much posting of noise in threads, a failing track record of my Google-fuuing (didn't Google for correct spelling--ironic, eh!) in search of truths, and possibly by sockpuppets of users whose main accounts don't ignore me, but may feel it's a punishment of sorts to me for digging under their skin.
If it's worth anything, your post above hopefully will keep me in check as to my future posting habits. That said, top o' the morning to you, Limey.
~Bruno~
What do you think... ?
...I must admit I like you. Upon reading several of your posts, another thing I need to give you is that I've yet to encounter any grammatical faux pas in your pennings. Only a handful of posters on this board can lay claim to such an admirable feat, if you get my driftwood.
~Bruno~
~Bruno~
I like you too
. You and Goat are among the very few users who have a highlighted ignore link and I find worth reading. 90%+ of the people with the ignore link highlighted are really annoying noise generators. Now if I release something privately don't hunt me down.
Why would you want to out someone who wants to stay private and has done nothing wrong?
Interesting post! So tell us, muyuu, where are you hiding him? Seriously, I never thought of it that way before. Very good point.!The only way I can answer that is that it's human nature to hunt a person that seems to have have gone into hiding. Yes, a copped-out answer, but that's the best I can give. I'm sure others brainier than I will have a better take on your question.
~Bruno~
I think it would be easier just to leave him alone, instead of trying too hard in justifying the unjustifiable
All he's done is contributing a fine system to the public.
We've crossed paths before, but not in a bad (I'm pretty sure), and not stating such now. Given...
Quote
I have no idea about Kronos and its operation, but Bitcoinica was run terribly. I don't know why would anyone extrapolate what happened to Bitcoinica to any other business, while still keeping the slightest degree of trust in Bitcoinica. Just doesn't make sense.
So Bitcoinica was running on a cheap cloud server, got hacked and learnt absolutely nothing from the incident. Got hacked again, while in another cheap cloud server (in Rackspace, who also offers several more secure options including one aimed at financial security standards - yet they opted to be cheap again despite the massive running profits) and you somehow still give them more credibility than you'd give to a new service that, for starters, had a beta testing period. Which Bitcoinica didn't. Bitcoinica was running, apparently, less than 1 week after ZhouTong laid the first line of code. To top it off, they made significant changes to their core business structure in complete secrecy, and when asked about particular details they repeatedly lied. It simply doesn't get much worse or unprofessional than this.
As with any other "financial" bitcoin operation, not running under any regulations and not liable, obviously I'd put any amount of BTC in Kronos at my own risk. If you're not ready to lose them, don't put them there. This should apply to any business not offering you any sort of legal guarantee over your funds.
So Bitcoinica was running on a cheap cloud server, got hacked and learnt absolutely nothing from the incident. Got hacked again, while in another cheap cloud server (in Rackspace, who also offers several more secure options including one aimed at financial security standards - yet they opted to be cheap again despite the massive running profits) and you somehow still give them more credibility than you'd give to a new service that, for starters, had a beta testing period. Which Bitcoinica didn't. Bitcoinica was running, apparently, less than 1 week after ZhouTong laid the first line of code. To top it off, they made significant changes to their core business structure in complete secrecy, and when asked about particular details they repeatedly lied. It simply doesn't get much worse or unprofessional than this.
As with any other "financial" bitcoin operation, not running under any regulations and not liable, obviously I'd put any amount of BTC in Kronos at my own risk. If you're not ready to lose them, don't put them there. This should apply to any business not offering you any sort of legal guarantee over your funds.
...,I must admit, I like you. Upon reading several of your posts, another thing I need to give you is that I've yet to encounter any grammatical faux pas in your pennings. Only a handful of posters on this board can lay claim to such an admirable feat, if you get my driftwood.
~Bruno~
Why would you want to out someone who wants to stay private and has done nothing wrong?
Interesting post! So tell us, muyuu, where are you hiding him? Seriously, I never thought of it that way before. Very good point.!The only way I can answer that is that it's human nature to hunt a person that seems to have have gone into hiding. Yes, a copped-out answer, but that's the best I can give. I'm sure others brainier than I will have a better take on your question.
~Bruno~
I think it would be easier just to leave him alone, instead of trying too hard in justifying the unjustifiable
All he's done is contributing a fine system to the public.
Why would you want to out someone who wants to stay private and has done nothing wrong?
Interesting post! So tell us, muyuu, where are you hiding him? Seriously, I never thought of it that way before. Very good point.!The only way I can answer that is that it's human nature to hunt a person that seems to have have gone into hiding. Yes, a copped-out answer, but that's the best I can give. I'm sure others brainier than I will have a better take on your question.
~Bruno~
Why would you want to out someone who wants to stay private and has done nothing wrong?
Yeah, not Satoshi. Satoshi has red hair and a big handlebar moustache.
So he's Ronald McDonald? You heard it from Gavin folks. LOL
[edit] It's makeup
Those were the only 2 clues I was missing. Thanks to you both, I found Satoshi Nakamoto.
Yeah, not Satoshi. Satoshi has red hair and a big handlebar moustache.
So he's Ronald McDonald? You heard it from Gavin folks. LOL
[edit] It's makeup
Yeah, not Satoshi. Satoshi has red hair and a big handlebar moustache.
WOW! Because of this thread, I found this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perplex_City
Image if something like this was reintroduced, but this time incorporate Bitcoin into the mix somehow.
~Bruno~
Image if something like this was reintroduced, but this time incorporate Bitcoin into the mix somehow.
~Bruno~
Jump to: